Recent events leading to the deaths of many American citizens are likely enough for people to strive for the addition of stricter gun control, although such action may really be meaningless and infringe upon the core rights established by the country’s founders themselves. American citizens are currently armed with privately-owned guns to protect their freedom. If used properly, private gun ownership is beneficial to those who want to feel safer personally owning firearms. This stance portrays the fact that some values of gun control may help such as more extensive background checks, but ultimately it is a futile attempt that will lead to a minimal affect on modern society. In theory, the abolishment of guns would not have an effect on the levels of gun-related violence as gun control laws do not deter crime; the improper use of guns and firearms falling into the hands of the mentally-ill and unstable deters crime.
Guns are undoubtedly dangerous yet, unlike most dangerous items they are far more controversial to talk about. There are two extreme positions on this topic that many can fall into when talking about firearms. Some want to ban guns completely, while the other side feels like guns are a right granted by our constitution and do not need regulation but instead, educate gun owners on the proper usage of a firearm. There are some flaws in both arguments. The problem with banning guns is that we should protect ourselves if the need arises.
Gun control is necessary, and delay means more death and horror”. We as a nation need to think about the dangers that guns convey in this society. We need to think about the safety of our children, and not in the economic gains. I know this is a nation whose one of main incomes comes from the selling of arms, however, is money more important than a human life? Guns should not have the destiny of life in his trigger, no.
Gun Control Gun control violates the second amendment an it takes away our rights to own and carry firearms. If people carry a concealed gun what are the chances that someone would steal from them, they won’t because they have a way to protect themselves. If the people the steal for money know that no one can have a concealed firearm then it is easy for them to take whatever they want. But if people have a way to protect themselves how much less would be stolen from others that work for what they have. The Second Amendment states, "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
So, in these cases, gun are not the best solution, instead individual should take defensive classes and use techniques taught on that class to try and run away from the criminal. In addition to this, Ms. Collins, like other people, doesn’t want to hand over her “safety to a third party” (Collins). But the thing is these “third party” are trained professional who are experienced in using guns. In addition to that, we, as human, live in a society where we depend on third party for a lot of our needs. Let’s look at a simple example: when we have a medical emergency, we don’t try to save our live by
Why Americans Need Guns The right to bear arms helps protect ourselves and our families. It is our constitutional right to bear arms and I believe it should not be taken away. Some people think if we did not have guns there would be less crime in the United States, but that is not true. When a person purchases a gun at a store they have to register that gun in their name, unless they buy a used one from someone else. If guns are banned the government will take innocent civilian guns away, because they have them registered in their names.
I think a criminal is a criminal whether they have a gun or not. They would both break the law so why wouldn’t they break the law to carry a gun. So I also wonder most of the time criminals don’t seem to fight other criminals but instead the law abiding citizens. Is that because they know the normal citizen is not packing and that the other
I wish I could have a gun of my own to carry with me when and wherever I please. I’m against gun control I wish people with guns weren 't limited to their selection but also believe not everyone should be able to get a gun license and own and carry a gun. I wish the Government were stricter on getting guns. Not everyone should be able to carry a gun. But the americans who would pass the test earn their right to bear arms.
Guns aren’t made for killing or injuring people, yet that 's one of the main things they are being used for now. Guns are rarely used and bought for self defense. “Hatred will always exist,There will always be someone that takes offense to something said. Through a mix of fear and misunderstanding That is America’s shame. Not that we have people who hate, but that we make it so easy for people to obtain the means to turn that hatred dealy” (Mcdonald,2016).
With some kind of identifiable object registered to one person, it prevents someone else from ever operating it. With this system in place, it would be easy to log when someone is moving the location of a gun, loading a gun or firing a gun. If your gun was only to be used in emergency situations, this could effortlessly send a police officer to your house to make sure everything is alright. But like any new system, there is potential risks to this design. People want privacy, and don 't want everyone to know their whereabouts all the time, but phones already do that.
Even though gun laws prevent deaths, they infringe so many rights in the immutable Bill of Rights, which is one of the foundations of the great United States. Gun laws give too much power to the government and way less from the people, which will lead to government corruption. And, stated by ClearPictureOnline.com,”Guns don 't kill people, people do. We need to concentrate on the values and morals of our citizens and at the role the media plays in glorifying violence and the lack of respect for law.” (Shootout: Do We Need More Gun Control Regulations?) What people don 't understand is that they are taking away their own freedoms with Gun Control.
Would Stricter Gun Control Laws Benefit America? The highly debatable question has flooded the minds of Americans. It is continued to be argued throughout America. The Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States clearly states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Obama’s effort to enforce this amendment may leave America in a frantic position. Stricter gun laws would not benefit America because they would restrict the rights of citizens, restrict the reliability and freedom citizens deserve, and would do nothing to prevent killings from occurring.
This assignment is not to point fingers on which side is right, but this assignment is to come to common grounds to enforce safety for our society from needless gun violence. The availability of guns to criminals has this country at great risk of