The Argument Against Paying College Athletes
The justification of attending college is to acquire professional training and skills, so why should college athletes be compensated? Paying college athletes more than the scholarships they already have is not a good idea. Even though college athletes should be paid because they don't have time to work, they shouldn't be paid because it could send a negative message to kids and high school students and they already got paid through their tuition, fees, and transportation. While it may inspire more children to participate in sports, it may also convey a negative message and misunderstand why they should do so. For instance, every child, regardless of talent, will grow up wanting to play football because they will be focused on the money. Then, the high school level will also demand compensation. College sports would be sending the message that it is acceptable to withhold additional funds and to pay only certain athletes. It will propagate a false belief about the benefits of sports for children.
…show more content…
Furthermore, college athletes already receive superior services that exceed salary payments. Athletes should not be exempt because they receive more treatment and benefits than other students. Since, athletes receive more treatment and benefits than other students, they should not be exempt. College athletes are not held to the same standards as the elite universities, which provide the athletes with the best gyms to exercise in, free health insurance for injuries, transportation, food, and, most importantly, tuition, stated in the article “Athlete Reason Why They Shouldn’t Pay”, page 2. College athletes shouldn't be paid because the services they receive are already covered by a payment for a few year. A salary is neither necessary nor required for these excellent services. College athletes do not require additional support beyond what they already
Why College Athletes should not get Paid Wouldn't you want your college to be a fair place? College athletes are not paid because fans could lose interest if the players had been expert athletes. Paying all college athletes involves a number of tough enterprises and money, so for universities to be an awesome and fair region for all students colleges generally choose to now not to pay college athletes. College athletes need to know not to be paid because these athletes chose to be athletes, and also no one has sufficient money to pay everyone, so there could now not be any equality, however, some argue that athletes spend all their time and don’t get what they deserve returned. Different programs within the college could be erased if college athletes receive a commission consistent with maryville.edu “athletes will diminish the spirit of amateurism” this means that if students get a possibility to receive a commission at college they may never need to pick some other class which can have an effect on their future.
Lastly paying college football and basketball players would force them to stay in school longer and finish their degrees (Walch 1). Even the top prospected football and basketball are not guaranteed a career in their specific
One of the reasons why college athletes should be paid is that they bring in a significant amount of revenue for their universities. As noted in "The Case for Paying College Athletes," “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million.” Text 1 line 1-3
Instead, pay college athletes with real money so it allows them to have more of an education while earning money to use for other necessities. Another justification for paying athletes is that they still require more than just a scholarship. Even though they receive scholarships, that doesn't mean they have enough money for
In fact, only seven percent of high school athletes continue their athletic careers into college. There are many reasons for this like choosing a different career path, not wanting to risk injury, or simply because there is no guarantee. If there were a system in place that allowed those same athletes to get paid for their contributions, then many more would continue. The pay doesn’t necessarily need to be groundbreaking or on the same level as professional athletes by any means, just something reasonable to cover everyday expenses. This would also increase the level of competition currently being played by being able to include incentives based on performance.
College athletes undertake quite the journey the instant they make the decision to dive into that pool, shoot that winning goal, or fulfill whatever their heart desires. These talented athletes have to manage their academic life, their personal life, and their athletic life all at once, which can prove to be a fairly difficult task, and considering that the only financial benefits they receive from it are scholarships, its understandable why some might be a bit disgruntled that they are not paid directly. However, paying college athletes is in no way a good idea, as this could lead them to neglect their academic life, and even take a major chunk out of an entire college's funding. If colleges started paying their athletes, it could cause them
Over the past few years, the idea of paying college athletes has been a very hot and sought after topic to talk about. Many people desire and strive to one day be good enough at a sport that they can get a scholarship to continue their athletic careers. There has been many questions circulating in regards to if collegiate athletes should be paid to play for universities. Gaining an education and degree for cheaper than everyone else attending college should be more than enough to keep athletes playing for colleges. College athletes should not be paid to play their sport.
For the athletes, the money made from their sport would allow increased concentration on their studies due to less focus on tuition and living costs. As statistics have previously shown about the minimal chances of ever going pro as an athlete, a salary would make the time the college athletes spent on their sport worthwhile, and they can also have a higher chance of being better off financially post college. If their time as a college athlete is made valuable, it will also increase motivation and potential to further hone their skills to perform better in their sport. Though giving college athletes a salary would be exceptionally beneficial for them, it also has negative aspects as well, pertaining to the colleges’ perspective about it. One major argument made against college athletes salaries is that if they get paid, then they would become regular employees, and are then subject to being laid off.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
In today 's life college athletes are not pleased because they don’t get any compensation at all from their sport they are playing. There is a lot of similarities between professionals players and college athletes players like to broadcast of their games, they both can seen on the Tv or media. They both let people know the intense game that the players play, which gives the people a lot of excitement and grabs the people attention to pay for a ticket. Does it affect the college athlete to not get paid at all? Well according to some experts, it does because athletes need that money to pay college tuitions, to buy books, to pay apartment rent, etc.
College Athletes Should Not Recieve Payment College student-athletes should be paid, right? Maybe not. As an athlete, I put in 3 or more hours of work daily for my sport, from practice, training, and watching film. I do all this for the love of the game, not so that one day I can go to college and compete to get paid the highest and have that be my main focus rather than my development as a player. Being paid would bring conflict to sports people once loved.
Without the ability to receive pay for playing the sport they love, many college athletes will fall short financially and their dreams will be diminished. Paying college athletes creates opportunities for the young men and women to make money by doing what they love. College athletes deserve payment because they bring in money to their university, they do not have the time for a regular job, and it would incentivize them to stay in school to get their degree. College athletes should receive compensation for bringing in millions of dollars to their university.
I’ve never had a strong opinion on whether college athletes should be able to get paid or not. Both sides have persuaded me, but I never really dug deep into this topic. Now that I have searched a lot deeper and developed my own opinion, I believe that college athletes should be able to be paid. College athletes, specifically division one players, have a very high value in terms of "cash." These athletes are worth so much more money than a full-ride scholarship.
Colleges can spare a few hundred thousand dollars to play their athletes. They should be paid because college athletes bring in money, they don’t have time for a job, and the sport causes damage to their body. One of the reasons that college athletes should be paid is because college athletes bring in money. With their name, image, and likeness college athletes bring in a lot of money for their schools by endorsing their
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.