False Confessions in Police Interrogations There is much speculation in regard to what occurs during interrogations among law enforcement officials, particularly in instances in which the suspect fails to request the presence of a representative attorney (Beijer, 2010). “The police interrogation is and always will be a critical stage in a criminal procedure” (Beijer, 2010, p. 311). Interrogation results largely determine the next phase of a criminal investigation in regard to the selection of witnesses for interviewing, the specificity of scientific tests that will conducted, and also given the fact that statements made to the police can be used against individuals in a court of law. Obtaining a confession during the interrogation process serves
This clearly sows that the memory is an active process and is expected to alter an opinion based on understanding society (Simple Psychology, 2014) . Eyewitness testimony is unethical as the evidence that is supplied can be provided by someone with stress or anxiety issues this can assist by distraught the image of the suspect. Wrongfully sending an innocent individual to prison. Bloods worth’s case displays it is unethical as there was no psychical evidence nor appearance matched that supported Bloodsworth was responsible for the murder and rape of the victim. Three eyewitnesses were able to identify the perpetrator out of the five and this was based from evidence that he was spotted with the young girl hours earlier before the crime was
False Confessions- The Breakdown Imagine being in court, tears running down your cheeks, watching a family member get their sentencing for a crime that they had no involvement in. Not only were they not involved, but the confession that they made was unknowingly the keys to the lock. From this situation, one can conclude that this situation would be anyone 's worst nightmare. False confession is a problem of the judicial system that occurs often. With every major problem, there is a major solution, thus false confession is a major problem in which could be fixed through video recording.
Police often tell lies when working a case or in pursuit of the truth. They are permitted to distort facts, create facts, manipulate information, and often times mislead people in order to solve crimes and apprehend the bad guys. Officer will tell a suspect in a crime they have video of him or her committing the offense or they will say they have a witness who can identify them. Some will even go to the extent to pose the question to those under suspicion of whether or not they can explain the presence of their DNA at a crime scene, making them believe it has already been found. This is usually done with little or no backlash from top administration or from the public at large.
Jay has told court officials that he believes Adnan is guilty of Hae’s murder, but Syed and other testimonies disagree. Adnan was put behind bars and has been in jail ever since. So the question; was Adnan’s trial a fair one? No, Adnan Syed is everything but guilty. It would be impossible for him to be able to strangle Hae in 21 minutes after the final release bell of school.
Many believe that the parents of the Sandy Hook victims conspired to murder their children, but what they fail to realize is that all their “ evidence” is just circumstantial. In court all types of various evidence is presented to the jury. According to Citizens Information “ The general rule is that circumstantial evidence is admissible. However, the courts are careful when the only evidence in a case is circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence must be closely examined and it must be looked at cumulatively.
It showing that parts of the judicial system are unjust. They put so much fear into the teens that they didn’t know what to do and were just saying anything to be with their family. By making a deal with the teens in exchange for a story I felt that was wrong because they are lying about what happened and they stores have different parts off the back I knew they were going to jail. Later on the right man who committed the crime confessed and the case was vacated against all five teens. They have every right to file for a settlement for what they went through it was unfair and they were granted a settlement for $42 million which they deserved.
When chain of custody is done correctly, it is proof to the court that the evidence presented in front of them is the same evidence collected from the crime scene. However, policy will in fact impact everyone involved in the case. If somewhere during the chain of custody process is done incorrectly, the suspect will surely get away with his crime because the evidence was inadmissible in court. Basically when there is a weapon, the first person to handle it would initial it. Then the supervisor would then make sure the storage is safe and secure.
One such argument can find its’ basis in the fact that the attorney-client privilege has the potential to protect guilty men and women. An example can be found in the Buried Bodies Case, when Robert Garrows confessed the murders to Frank Armani and the information was kept confidential. Thus, protecting Garrows, a guilty man, from any punishment at the time. Many would also argue that even if the crime is not privately confessed between the client and their attorney, it hides reliable evidence that could otherwise be used to convict the unjust. Another strong argument that can be used is the fact that, in court, you must be truthful.
Polygraph testing would be considered an exaggerated claim because there is no scientific validity to back up the emotional response. “Because it measures physiological arousal rather than lying per se, the polygraph test is prone to mislabeling innocent persons guilty.” (Lilienfeld, Landfield 1222) As previously discussed, this test is based upon emotions, which the article by Scott Lilienfeld and Kristen Landfield further proves the pseudoscience behind polygraph testing. Throughout law enforcement and police officials’ careers, they are faced with daily challenges in pseudoscience, and the article further describes how lie detection is a part of that process. It also discusses in the article that they agree that the lie detectors should not be administered in a court of law. Another theory that comes into effect when discussing lie detector testing is terror management theory.