The first contact that an offender has with the criminal justice system tends to begin with a police officer. By having more defined policies and procedures emplaced at police departments, the biases that we have can be controlled and minimized significantly. The warnings and citations would have to exclude any and all areas where ethnicity and or race are requested. As well, all documents presented to court would have to exclude all possible personal identifiers of the person being handled; even that I am not sure to be possible. We live in a world of uncertainties that cause the law to be
And in many cases, they can only observe and report, or generating a report. The law enforcement personnel have a much greater responsibility to uphold the law. An example is to protect and served the public, or a particular assigned community. And more than often than not, officer are face with the decision that involved the use of deadly force in order to protect life, or perhaps makes an arrest if necessary. On the other hand, there is some similarity between citizen patrol and police officers practice in keeping a neighborhood safe.
They have to know that they cannot touch or process anything on the scene without a warrant. Furthermore, they have to ensure that all of the evidence is collected properly, as well as a proper perimeter is established around the crime scene to keep unauthorized people out of the scene to avoid contamination and collection of evidence. They have to also deal with the issue of sometimes getting information from witness, while making sure that their safety is not placed in any
The lawyer, the sheriff as well as the jurors are all contributors within a criminal justice system with a responsibility to the truth, but who choose to ignore it in order to achieve what they consider the ‘right‘ result, based on their personal morality. I firmly believe that morality should be enshrined in the law and employed impartially to all, through public mechanisms such as trials, not privately or subject to the whims of
Crime Control with Due process 1 Crime Control with Due process Christian Rousselle Lethbridge College Due process protects the legal rights of the accused, to insure that officials from the Criminal Justice 2 system follows procedures when arresting and processing Individuals. Due process makes sure that innocent people are not convicted of criminal offences that they never committed. The criminal Justice Officials are constantly
America has a strict law, which protects our citizens from predators; sex offender registries are exemplifications. In the article “Protect Yourself, Family From Sex Offenders,” Rick Schneider argues that sex offender’s name should not be taken off even after they had served their time. Many can argue that registries are a good way for the government authorities to keep track, and to protect the community from any violence caused by sex offenders. For example, many people may believe the registry protects people from predators because it allows others to know where the predators are and how likely they are to strike again. On the other hand, some people consider that it is “horribly unfair” to release the names and addresses of offenders that
In this paper many will understand the concepts and the role of a stop and frisks. It will allow the readers to see the good and perhaps the bad of stop and frisk process. The research will also allow the readers to see how law enforcement can abuse power of authority in certain situation. Stop and frisk can be good and evil depending on the type of police officer at the time using his or her belief of the “Golden Rule” (meaning treating others with respect as everyone wants to be treated.) Stop and frisk is when police temporarily detain somebody and pat down their outer clothing when there are specific articulable facts leading a reasonable police officer to believe a person is armed and dangerous.
I informed my partner if I lied it would make me just as corrupt as her. I told my partner that a law enforcement officer must use an honest effort to perform official duties. As a law enforcement officer, you are prohibited from encouraging, directing, coercing, or requesting another officer from being dishonest in the performance of official duties. All law enforcement officers are expected to maintain high standards of conduct, cooperation, efficiency, and economy in their work, and shall attempt to correct any faults in their performance which are called to their attention and to make every effort to avoid behavior and actions. Law enforcement officer should be mindful of disciplinary consequences in making frivolous
I mentioned a few reasons on how the use of force has made police officers look bad. It is making officers look bad because recordings from the public only show the beatings and shootings, but do not capture the beginning of the confrontation. It will be bet for officers and the goof being of the community I officers use body-worn cameras because it will capture every second that happens between confrontations. The use of force is granted to the officers if they feel like the suspect is dangerous or is not complying with the officer. It was a right given to them by a case back in 1985, in which a person was killed by deadly force.
In today’s world, unless you call and ask for help, the police are not your friend. Police in 2015 is around to decide if you’ve done something wrong and whether they can arrest you or not to “maintain order” in the community. When you get pulled over by a police you should follow three simple rules. The first rule is to always be courteous and polite to the cop. The second rule is to resist every request of the police until he uses force.