Arranged Marriage vs. Free Marriage Generally marriage is a significantly hard decision and affect all aspects of our lives. Moreover, all the marriage will not be successful with a happy ending. Choosing your spouse and married free with love is popular and legal in many countries and Arranged marriage in which parents choose who you can marry are two types of marriages. Both systems have benefits and drawbacks, but deciding about your life and choosing your partner seems more logical and natural. With marriage freely people have a chance to know each other better before marriage, understand their partners’ priority, and last but not the least they can marry with love.
Another argument would be that each person is made for one other person and that’s what makes us monogamous. In reality, it all depends on our own mindset to know which path to follow, or at least that’s just one opinion. According to Shakespeare’s Hamlet, it is considered acceptable to marry and be beloved by more than one person since circumstances diverted to lead to that end. Hamlet’s case reveals that his mother, Gertrude, should not have married “a vice of kings, A cutpurse of the empire and the rule”. Though that is one opinion on the table, his mother Gertrude would negate him with this ideal since she married Claudius for the
The Civil War changed the nations beliefs about equality and freedom for everyone. The white culture will be upset about this situation in a while (paragraph 1, Ain’t I A Woman). While everyone wanted equal rights, some white people didn’t want slavery to end. This changed the nations views about equality because if one person is affected the whole nation would be affected by it. “under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth” (paragraph 4, Gettysburg Address).
The biggest argument that follows polygamy is whether it is an abusive trap or not. Obviously, the intent of polygamy is not to go against universal values, such as sexual activities with minors or adultery, but there are groups of people who take the original idea of polygamous marriages and relationships and twist it into a sinister act. Polygamy, in its pure form, is a moral and valid type of marriage. The few who do abuse this type of marriage for odd and disturbing sexual habits would most likely continue to commit these acts whether or not they were polygamous. Therefore, true religious Polygamists
Society still sees this as a media and business propaganda. Netizens everywhere are insisting that though they are for the LGBT community, none of them are for portraying the LGBT community as heroic. In my opinion, the LGBT community should exist just as any other communities exist. I am for equal rights, but not for special treatment. To further discuss, I do believe this change would affect conservative countries and even to a certain extent, religions.
Society is negatively affected by same-sex marriage because it is still viewed as separate and different, procreation for society is between a man and a women, and it takes way the mother and father figure. Opponents argue that same-sex marriage positively affects society since children are able to flourish with same-sex parents, marriage does not need to be between a man and a women for procreation purposes, and same-sex married couples are not viewed as seperate from society but have equal dignity. Foremost, children are not affected by having parents of the same-sex and are still able to succeed in life. Not having either a mother or a father does not change how the child will grow up. Comparatively, marriage is no longer seen as between a man and a woman.
I believe that the 14th amendment expressed the rights to same-sex marriage to be legal underneath the due process clause. The ruling that gay marriage is to be legal in 2015 had come to an end, saying that under the 14th amendment it would be ruled unconstitutional to have gay marriage illegal. Now, this is extremely important because with marriage, you are granted many rights and benefits as a couple and supporters of gay marriage would say that equal protection means that there should also be equal access to civil benefits of marriage. Under the Bill of Rights, we as citizens are granted our enumerated rights that include the liberties expressed in the due process clause of the 14th amendment where it
This is consistent with the principle of freedom and equality. Withholding civil marriage from homosexual couples violates a fundamental right: the right to marry the partner of one’s choice. According to the Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights, men and women have the rights to marry and found a family in their marriageable age. Legalising homosexual marriage in Hong Kong could allow the same-sex couples enjoy the same rights with the opposite-sex couples. Apart from providing fundamental right, legalisation could reduce the social discrimination.
With the famous Supreme Court Case Obergefell v. Hodges that befell American society in 2015, many people believe that the same-sex marriage controversy is over; however, this is far from reality. Many people still believe that same-sex couples should be denied the right to marry. However, these people are on the wrong side of history: same-sex marriage should be endorsed by all, and its time as a controversial topic should be put to a stop. First of all, governments and businesses must comply with legal obligations that protect homosexual couples. The government, first of all, must follow the Constitution.
Marriage Same Sex Couples Act 2013- Separate not Equal. The act has afforded Same Sex couples the ability to marry, however discrimination is evident since the rights which accompany this are not equal to those which accompany heterosexual marriage. The Marriage Same Sex Couples Act 2013, hereafter referred to as the Act 2013, is an important piece of legislation as it signifies the move toward acceptance of different lifestyles and seems to adhere to the separation of church and state. It has enabled persons who are of a homosexual or transgender orientation to elevate their relationship to the status of marriage. The Act 2013 has afforded same sex couples the ability to marry in civil ceremonies, they may be turned away by religious organizations, since religious organizations may marry same sex couples only if they have ‘explicitly opted in.’ It is not unlawful for a religious organization or minister to refuse to marry a same sex couple as per the Equality Act of 2010, which is in accordance with Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights which guarantees the right to freedom of religion.