At the very young age, we have been taught which is right and wrong. We have been told that murder is sinful and the biggest sin that human do is stealing someone’s life. Capital punishment is defined as a legal process of punishment where a person is being executed by government. Capital punishment stirs up fierce debate for decades, whether or not it is acceptable for the state to deprive someone’s life as a form of punishment. Capital punishment should be eliminated from our legal systems because capital punishment does not deter the level of crime and it is morally wrong and inefficient for the states.
The death penalty is an ineffective method of punishment for criminals because it is not ethical, it does not stop crime, and innocents could be killed. Firstly and most obviously, the death penalty is wrong and unethical. Lethal injection is the type of punishment most used today, goes against the constitution, and is incredibly cruel. While it is perhaps less cruel than older forms of execution, such as the electric chair, it is still very unconstitutional. In an article about lethal injection, the author states,“The current use of lethal injections constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, which is prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution” (Lethal Injection).
Crimes are happening around us whether we pay attention to them or not. Those crimes as dangerous as murder are committed by all ages but should younger criminal in their juvenile age received the same punishment as older criminals. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the Eighth Amendment. (On-Demand Writing Assignment Juvenile Justice) Advocates on the concurring side believes that mandatory life in prison is wrong and should be abolish. However, the dissenting side believe that keeping the there should be a life in prison punishment for juvenile who commit heinous crime regardless of their age.
Miscarriages of justice occur and the innocent are executed. The American Bar Association (ABA) has urged the appointment of experienced, competent, and adequately compensated trial counsel for death penalty cases and has lobbied for the adoption of its Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases. Clearly, the ABA believes that standard professional qualifications are insufficient for capital cases. 3. The death penalty expresses a desire for vengeance—a motive too volatile and indifferent to the concept of justice to be maintained in a civilized society.
The Death Penalty The death penalty has been, and still is, one of the most discussed topics in the United States. Its opponents argue it to be an unnecessary and violent punishment because it seems no less barbaric than the crime, as well as it is sometimes not believed to serve its purpose as a deterrent. However, there is a fundamental difference between the loss of an innocent life and the execution of a criminal in accordance with the law. Death penalty might not be the most ideal solution, but abolishing it would put in danger the lives of many innocent and law-abiding citizens. Not only has the death penalty proven to be constitutional, cost effective, ethically correct deterrent of future murders, but it also is a punishment that fits the crime.
Therefore, abolishing the death penalty will not influence anything. As a matter of fact, it is just a huge waste of resources. One of the most argued reasons for why the death penalty should be gotten rid of permanently is fairness. In many different cases regarding the death penalty, people are wrongly killed. African Americans, hispanics, and other various races are statistically prosecuted more severe.
People who support the usage of death penalty say that the capital punishment is the best way to deter people from committing crimes, while those who oppose the death penalty believes that an alternative punishment should be applied instead of enforcing death penalty. It is correct to say that the capital punishment has its own advantages, but this article suggests that the abolishment of the death penalty is essential so as to eliminate its disadvantages. The first argument is that the government bears a financial burden when enforcing capital punishment. The required amount for executing people may seem much lower than that of keeping them in jail. Nevertheless, the fact is that the cost of confining a person to death is much higher than keeping him/her in jail for life.
To elucidate, a disadvantage of both biological theories of crime and sociological theories of crime is that they both maintain that either biological or environmental factors are the direct cause of criminal behaviour. It appears that these theories argue that genetic factors and environmental factors directly cause criminality when, in fact, these factors simply make individuals more likely to commit crimes, rather than being the direct cause of criminality. If individuals would engage in criminality due to the influence of these factors, then everyone who is influenced by these factors should be committing in crimes; however, this is not the case. Neither the biological perspective nor the sociological perspective address this issue. Moreover, it is impossible to determine the extent to which these factors affect individuals.
“I support the death penalty because I believe, if administered swiftly and justly, capital punishment is a deterrent against future violence and will save other innocent lives" (Bush). George W. Bush is trying to emphasize the importance of the Death Penalty because it contributes to many factors in society. The Death Penalty is an action that is taken upon by the Government, which legally terminates the life of a convict due to his heinous crimes. There are many groups and individuals who have different views on the Death Penalty, although, it creates a huge impact towards the ones affected by the case. Those individuals who are against the punishment don’t realize how crucial the crimes that convicts commit and the amount of damage they
Innocent lives are ruined due to false accusations and in our efforts to always want to be right, we are letting criminals get away. When Mr. Cannon was telling his story, I believe he didn't mention anything about the police reading him his rights and that they just attacked him out of nowhere. I understand that the police are supposed to interrogate all suspects, but the laws regarding the proper protocols are rarely followed. I often times feel that, racial bias factors in interrogation tactics and that certain suspects are treated better than others. For instance, John Burge in my head is considered a criminal, even though he was convicted, he still is not facing the consequences that Mr. Cannon has to deal with as being an African American person in the community.