Arguments For Animal Use In Scientific Experiments
This second section will discuss the other side of the debate—for animal use in scientific experiments. Like in the previous discussion, I have divided this debate into three separate sections.
Power & Dominion Like those who argue against animal experimentation, some individuals who argue for it, have a philosophy as well. From my research, I have noted that many of these individuals base their philosophy on the idea of power and dominion. A power that only humans possess, and therefore have dominion over all non-human animals. Religion justification is one of the main ways in which scientists argue for animal research. In an empirical study, Pru Hobson-West conducted interviews with 18 laboratory scientists to discuss their views on
…show more content…
In the ancient Greek times, the use of live animals for knowledge never raised any moral debate. But rather using these animals to gain knowledge meant power, and a way of being closer to the divine, and establishing a higher rank in the chain of being (hierarchy where all living and non-living are ranked according to their closeness to the divine) (Franco, 2013, p. 239). This could have been the starting point to which the philosophy of dominion over all beings, has started.
Government Support: Politics & Law Government support through policies and regulations, allow laboratories and companies to conduct animal research lawfully. Though there was not much written about this argument, it is important to include this topic in this debate. However, government support in animal experimentation is evident through the implementation of laws and policies both to regulate animal research, as well to take action against those who oppose it. Scientists themselves agree that with the help of government law and policies, they are protected from the critiques of the public, and animal activists (West, 2012, p. 656). In general, federal law (U.S Government) implements regulations and policies that focus on the standards for basic animal welfare (Latham, 2012, par. 10), rather than just banning the use of animal experimentation all
…show more content…
The structure for both sources are for the most part the same. For example, they both include an introduction, or a brief description about what the page, or publication will be talking about, as well as a conclusion. Both sources also kept the reader’s attention by using engaging language both at the beginning of the reading, and
Ap Psychology Chapter 2 Summary
1304 Words | 6 PagesCritics have claimed that the results from an animal cannot generalize over to people, and while this can be true, assumptions about human behavior based on animal research takes into consideration data from descriptive as well as experimental studies with people. The second objection to animal research is that it has no practical value as the research only provides facts that are only useful to a theoretician. While this might sometimes be the case the findings from animal research have been able to be put to good use in topics such as child rearing, sports, and education. Lastly, many critics are quick to say that animal research is unethical as people have no more right to experiment on animals as animals have to experiment on people. While there are ethical concerns that should be taken seriously these concerns beg the question of if it is unethical to use animals in research what about eating them, what about forcing them to be our pets or what about using animals on
A Rhetorical Analysis Of David Masci's Article On Animal Rights
1750 Words | 7 PagesThe controversy within animal testing has continued to grow splitting the activists from the scientists. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services referred to these supporters as not activists but “terrorists” for hindering their research opportunities (13) Freelance writer, David Masci, attempts to address
Summary Of Alternative Testing Cannot Replace Animal Experimentation By George Poste
531 Words | 3 PagesThis article is targeted for people interested in animal rights, experiments on them, and alternative testing methods. Poste’s purpose for writing this
Persuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesWhile viewing animal experiments can be conducted both through the prism of the benefits and the disadvantages, this issue served as a powerful reason for discussions in the society and points out the need for
The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesNoah Berlatsky. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2015. Current Controversies. Rpt. from "Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint."
Pro Animal Testing Essay
577 Words | 3 PagesAlone in the United States, a calculated seventy million animals are murdered for “scientific benefit” in the hands of household products, government agencies, cosmetics companies, scientific centers, and educational institutions. Although it may appear to be beneficial to test on animals it is actually hurting the innocent animals population in large numbers, and at a rapid pace. Innocent animals are being harmed and killed for the benefit of a human's safety. Most people claim animal testing is the correct choice while others oppose it, as it is improper and unlawful. Although some people think the good outweighs the negative, the harm being caused to these animals cannot be undone.
Persuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong
1111 Words | 5 PagesAlthough the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.
Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing
1152 Words | 5 PagesAnimal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’
Animal Testing Should Be Used In Scientific Experiments
860 Words | 4 PagesThe controversial topic that I chose to do my research paper on is whether or not animal testing should be used in scientific experiments. This topic is important because 26 million animals are used annually in the U.S alone. I chose this topic because of the strong views of both sides and how well backed up they are. This is a major discussion that has been going on for years with no apparent resolution in sight. There are two sides to using animal testing, which are that using animals has helped us in experiments, making us able to test on living subjects without using human volunteers, and that animal testing is abusive, cruel and unnecessary because of the other resources we could use, being that animals are different from humans.
Animal Testing Persuasive Essay
2063 Words | 9 PagesThese experimentation usually takes place at Universities, medical schools, Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. As a result, ( introductory phrase) a study made by University of Harvard states that “more than 70,000 animals die each year due to running experiments on them.” Therefore from my point of view, animal experimentation should be reduced due to the drawback it has regarding to animal lives as it leads to the torture and suffering of animals. In addition, the final outcome of these experiments is not always
Why Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned
796 Words | 4 PagesEvery year, millions of animals were suffering or killed due to scientific research. Some animal rights groups suggest that we should ban animal experiments because use animals for experimentation is cruel and animals should have the same right of living as human beings. A report from U.S. Department of Agriculture shows that more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. There are some other people believe that the death of animals will help and save millions of human lives. Personally I believe that the experimentation on animals for scientific and medical should not be stopped.
Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing
1067 Words | 5 PagesImagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.
Why Is Animal Research Good Or Bad
375 Words | 2 PagesAnimals are used for research in today's society, this research is growing bigger and bigger as the years go by. There is many different view points on animal research both good and bad, There is many different outlooks and view points on animal research that have people wondering if it should be allowed or illegal. Scientists use this for their own benefits and money, while the outsiders are looking in and think it is cruel. In 2011, over 1,000 biochemist scientists were polled, 90% of these agreed that animal research was good to use.
Animal Testing On Animals Essay
469 Words | 2 PagesTesting on Animals For many decades, using animals for testing has become one of the many controversial topics. Experimenting on animals can be beneficial but can be misleading when an animal has a different response than a human. Animals have as much rights as humans do but are still being violated. And even when there has been laws and acts passed to protect them, they are still being used in many laboratories in the United States.
Benefits Of Animal Experimentation
825 Words | 4 PagesThroughout the centuries, medical doctors have researched on live animals to find cure to several diseases which affect both the animals and humans. Even though many people endure this practice as noble, some people still look down at animal experimentation as a cruel and inhumane treatment to animals. The government has already authorized animal experimentation to mitigate the unrest by those people. In fact, The Animal Welfare Act covered most lab animals, and provided guidelines for pain alleviation during procedures, food, and housing. However, the government still has to take more action to spread the awareness about the benefits of animal experimentation (Person).
More about Arguments For Animal Use In Scientific Experiments
Ap Psychology Chapter 2 Summary
1304 Words | 6 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of David Masci's Article On Animal Rights
1750 Words | 7 PagesSummary Of Alternative Testing Cannot Replace Animal Experimentation By George Poste
531 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesThe Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesPro Animal Testing Essay
577 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong
1111 Words | 5 PagesPersuasive Speech On Animal Testing
1152 Words | 5 PagesAnimal Testing Should Be Used In Scientific Experiments
860 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Testing Persuasive Essay
2063 Words | 9 PagesWhy Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned
796 Words | 4 PagesPersuasive Essay On Animal Testing
1067 Words | 5 PagesWhy Is Animal Research Good Or Bad
375 Words | 2 PagesAnimal Testing On Animals Essay
469 Words | 2 PagesBenefits Of Animal Experimentation
825 Words | 4 Pages