Arguments Of Protectionism: The Pros And Cons Of Protectionism

A few years ago in 1807, congress had passed the Embargo Act, an act that forbids foreign trade. Today, a few years from that day in 1807 we look back on the preoccupations that have occurred because of the act. In just one year we saw our U.S exports decline by $84,000,000. We started with $109,000,000 and ended with $25,000,000.Thousands of Americans have turned to smuggling. The Embargo has trigger a serious Economic Depression and not much can save us right now.

Microeconomic factors significantly affect a business, especially global expansion. Therefore, some factors to analyze and monitor are the price elasticity of goods, competition in the market and the economy state. The state of economy determines consumer spending trends. An economic downfall will lead to a decrease in consumers spending and an increase in the economy state, will escalate consumer spending. There is no doubt that competition in the U.S. is robust and is the same in China, however, Nordstrom must have the ability to choose their competitive advantage as a global expansion strategy regardless if it is suited for success in the Chinese market. If the limits and resources required for the development are obliged in any way, it could incite higher costs, delays, budgetary adversities and failure to meet their global objectives (Davis, 2017). In order to achieve and sustain competitive advantage, Nordstrom must manage their risks and threats effectively and coordinate appropriate productivity company wide. Nordstrom must focus security, customer experience, flexibility to guarantee competitive advantage and success.

Monroe’s presidency was emblematic of national harmony. Coined “the Era of Good Feelings” by the Columbian Centinel, the surge of national pride from the War of 1812 and the death of the Federalist party created a sense of unity in America. The government, for one of the first times in its young history, devoted itself to the nation rather than to divided regions. During this period, nationalism manifested in several forms, including economic, judicial, and diplomatic nationalism. Each facet of nationalism served to unify the country as a whole and mold it into a modern society.

From the 1880s to the 1930s, Japan and India both endured increase in the use of machines in the textile industry. Both countries had similar recruitment techniques, but differed greatly in the type of workers, and the conditions of which they worked in.

The title of the article is The Environmental Crisis: The Devil is in the Generalities, written by Ross McKitrick. It appears in the April 2008 edition of the Academic Matters journal. The author is an associate professor and director of graduate studies at the Department of Economics at the University of Guelph. In discussing the environment, the author argues that the topic is rather wide to use vague terms to define or understand it. The issue is further complicated by politicians who use it as a campaign scapegoat, in which they paint it as a crisis. The author fails to make compelling arguments on the environment since he does not use sufficient academic references for his information; and misunderstands the generalization issue.

What goverment is trul best for this country? What govermetnt truly secrues the rights and libirtys of the people? Federlist or anti-federlsit? goverment more than anything else defines a country. is it to be succsesful or a failure, are the people to prosper or suffer? once you exiamin federlism and anti-federlism it becomes clear only one would lead to a successful country and that is federlism. Federlism is best for the country becuse it secures the rights of the people,provides a stable government and produces a fair system to create laws.

The subgroups of the alliance were creating higher costs for one another, rendering each other unresponsive to the changing fashion choices of the U.S. consumer, and thereby reducing their own competitiveness. They were also struggling to predict the frequent policy changes associated with the textile industry, the cost of protecting the industry was proving to be too high, and the quotas were also driving the exporting countries to become high end producers. The protectionism was also increasing globe-trotting that in turn, further globalized apparel trade. In fact, the only good use of the trade barriers was as a powerful incentive with which the US could reward its friends, like it did with Pakistan after

The film “The True Cost” directed by Andrew Morgan, goes into great detail on the global world of fast fashion, and how it affects the global apparel industry. The countries in which the clothes are produced, there are significant issues with labour regulations, all to accommodate North America’s demand for fast fashion consumerism. The global North consumers demand for fast fashion have effects globally, leaving workers underpaid and exploited. Through management methods and outsourcing, firms search for the lowest costs for the consumer, without concern about the consequences for workers. Relocating the garment industry to the global South can arguably be the downfall of workers as they are sacrificing their lives for their job. Throughout

The activity of LVMH is mainly focused in luxury industry and its spectrum of products is divided into five generic fields:

This critique is a reflection of Strategic Industry Analysis of clothing Industry in United Kingdom, Italy and France. To achieve such aims, data were collected, reviewed and analyzed within the industry. By so doing, primary tools were exploited to give an in-depth information, these include: Orbis database, companies' web pages as well as academic and non-academic literatures. Due to limited information from countries' perspective (language barriers), this paper will analyze the European union clothing industry as a whole, in term of the development, the competitiveness and the disparity between top and bottom players in regards to financial performance.

Driving forces provide a framework to decide where and how to exercise market leadership. In this case, globalization is one of the main driving force that affect the fashion industry. Gap was recognized as a must have brand. However, through the years it has been losing competitive advantage due to the continual change. During the last years, Gap has been facing struggles because of its clothing design and faltered misjudgment fashion trend. As a result, the company has suffered for disappointing earnings and sales. One of the reasons is because in the attempt to turn around the company, the raw material and labor cost increased which lead to an increase of 20% per item. As a result, now the company is facing struggles because foreign competitors such as Zara, H&M, Walmart and Target are stealing its customers with cheaper and fresher fashion. Another driving force that affects the fashion industry is the information revolution. The instant availability of information and instantly interaction are the implication that has changed the nature of competition in the fashion industry. For example, a global style has been created across borders and cultures fashion as images in social media and internet are instantly distributed around the world. The company cannot longer rely on the traditional factors of production to provide a sustainable competitive advantage, but must look how they can exploit its knowledge acquired through the years in order to gain competitive advantage

Uniqlo is a company from Japan; it could easily take advantage of this political factor. Vietnam – Japan Economic Partnership Agreement signed in 2008 has brought opportunities for two countries’ businesses and consumers to “access capital sources, modern technology, materials and goods” effectively (Viet Trade Promotion Agency, n.d)

Louis Vuitton’s (LV) major source of revenue was Fashion and leather goods which was 35% as compared to other products and 20% of this revenue came from Japan, undoubtedly a strong hold in the Japanese markets, with that being said, there are a lot many opportunities for LV to exploit in terms of new and emerging markets like China and India, which have a lot of untapped potential. They can expand their market segment by targeting the middle class and upper middle class bracket, and diversify their target audience i.e. women by introducing clothing for men and children. The key to deal with the current situation of LV would be to reduce dependency on Japanese markets and

Leydier & Martin (2013) also states that, “despite the increasing expression of concern in political and media debates about issues such as climate change, pollution and threats to biodiversity, “political ecology” (operating at the confluence of scientific developments, political engagement and ethical debates) is still trying to find its bearings” (p.7). It is quite evident that environmental issues are not treated in equivalence to political, economic, social or even religious issues. This is because of our market led economy which only focusses on profit, competition and money making rather than a sustainable development approach. “Capitalism” has been identified by several scholars as the root cause for environmental degradation.

When it comes to comparing the past with the present, the idea of globalisation is deliberated quite often. The twentieth century coined the term ‘globalisation’ as international organisations were introduced, aiming to reduce trade barriers and maintaining healthy global trade relations. On the other hand, the twenty-first century induced a fear of globalisation as companies were outsourcing their production allowing certain societies to continue development while others remained constant. In June 2016, Brexit (Britain’s exit) took place because the majority of the United Kingdom (UK) voted to leave the European Union (EU). This event exhibits people disrupting the political mandate by voting against cultural and economic globalization. This paper briefly analyses the trend in trade over the last century that built the unstable political environment that stemmed the result of the UK elections. Initially, it will describe globalisation in the 20th century proceeding to that of the 21st century. Then, it will deliberate Brexit and the reasons behind it. Concluding by stating that globalisation is a valuable sign of moving forward that should be correctly reinforced globally and accepted by people accordingly.