In order to answer any metaphysical questions it is essential that one looks at Aristotle’s four causes. The four causes help us to better understand what a changing, living thing is. But for the sake of understanding Aristotle’s doctrine of the four causes I will discuss the four causes with reference to a wooden table though it is a non-living thing. Aristotle said that there are four things, or “causes”, one can point to in answering why something exists. These four causes are: The Material Cause, The Efficient Cause, The Formal Cause and The Final Cause. I will be using Aristotle’s four causes to aid me in answering the following question: Why does the wooden table exist?
Aristotle’s first cause, The Material Cause, is that of which the object being identified is made of. The wooden table’s Material Cause can be seen as the wood which is used to build the table and thus bringing the table into existence. Without the material (wood) the table is nothing but an idea and cannot ever materialize into an actual wooden table. One could even
…show more content…
(material cause)
• There was a pattern from which the table could be thought up of. (formal cause)
• The carpenter wanted it to exist and therefore he built it. (essential cause)
• There was a need for the table to perform certain tasks. (final cause)
Through discussing Aristotle’s doctrine of the four causes with reference to a wooden table I have come to the conclusion that when apposed with a metaphysical question involving the reason for the existence of something it is essential that one makes use of Aristotle’s four causes when attempting to come up with a suitable and relevant answer to the question. Aristotle’s four causes are extremely well thought and though when it comes to more in depth metaphysical questions it may become a bit more challenging to apply it, it will certainly serve as a good guide line and starting point to coming up with
Gopnik continues her article about children using their past to shape their future. She introduces the topic of causal understanding. Causal understanding includes the understanding the relationship between cause and effect. When people understand the relationship between cause and effect, it can allow them the change the process of habituation. Learning what goes wrong in life, can help assist breaking bad habits.
According to the regularity theorists, Hume would define “A causes B” as “A is regularly followed by B” . This appears to be supported by the famous billiard ball example that Hume employs in Section 4 of the Enquiry. When one sees billiard ball A hit billiard ball B, one would be inclined to say that A causes B to move. However, Hume as an empiricist, would disagree – we cannot observe the causality. All we can know is what we observe – that billiard ball A striking billiard ball B is regularly followed by billiard ball B moving.
The Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle 's most important study of personal morality and the end of human life, has for many centuries been a widely-read and influential book. In this paper, my aim is to understand and explain how Aristotle, an ancient world-known Greek philosopher, developed the idea of ethics based on a teleological matter. Thus, I will explain how Aristotle relates virtue to telos. To start with, in order to answer this question, we have to give a brief and clear definition of his idea of ethics, what are a teleological matter, and his view of virtue and how he relates it to telos?
Response to “On Being an Atheist” Ida Hart PHIL 201 – B30 LUO Dr. David Beck McCloskey’s article, “On Being an Atheist” contains arguments that he uses to explain Atheism, the non-existence of God. Using the claims made by theists and attempting to taint the character and nature of the Christian God, he points out what he calls several defects of the arguments. In his introduction he offers a brief reminder to fellow atheist stating the grounds and the inadequacies of these grounds for theism. He later calls them “proofs”, alleging that the proofs do not provide adequate justification for believing that God exists. This only proves that he is among the many that choose to use the arguments in the wrong way.
Yashira Flores Assignment 1 Chapter One Aristotle is one of the greatest thinkers in the history of western science and philosophy, making contribution to logic, metaphysics, physics, biology, botany, ethic, politics, agriculture, medicine, dance and theatre. He was a Greek philosopher and very educated man. He was student of Plato who in turn studied under Socrates. His view on all subjects was teleological. Aristotle recognized purposes apart from greater than the will of the individual human being and the first to classify areas of human knowledge into distinct disciplines such as mathematics, biology and ethics.
Why do individuals do certain things; one may not understand the consequences of an action, or realize that it has a positive or negative effect on the present and future of their lives. The cause of an action can tell why it has a specific effect. For instance, a short story by Joyce Carol Oates titled, “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been” is very interesting and allows you to make inferences based on the information given. One can evaluate from the material given the causes and effects of certain situations. This story is about a teenage girl named Connie, who replaces the traditional family values with her own because of how the music of that time period influenced her.
In his first-cause argument, he states that everything we are able to observe has a cause and that nothing can cause itself. In order for something to cause itself, it would have to exist prior to itself, which is impossible. Nor can something be caused by an infinite regress of causes. (Vaughn, Lewis. Pg.
“The Assayer” is a text written by Galileo Galilei in 1623. I intend to analyze a section from Galileo’s “The Assayer.” My analysis will cover the text’s five elements of the rhetorical triangle. The five elements of the rhetorical triangle include the speaker, occasion, audience, message, and purpose.
city, house, etc. cause: builder, human and effect universe-earth - cause: creator, God and effect (This doesn’t argue for omnipotent power but it does argue for a very powerful force) 2. Teleological Argument (Job 38,39:13-19) Purpose and Intelligent Design (Socrates was first associated with this argument) Birds get heavier feathers in winter-cows generate heat below 19 degrees.
To understand the effects we must take a look at the causes.
Remember that for Aristotle meant something different than what we intend when we say cause. We are referring to an action or event that occurred prior to another. For Aristotle, causes meant explanation. This explanation works fine for a man made article, so how does he explain cause in nature?
When it is said that the immaterial “substantiates” the material existence, this means that the immaterial determines and justifies the behaviors of the material body in its environment. Without the material and immaterial interacting in such a way, the physical body would behave irrationally and possibly in ways that would undermine its ability to facilitate a functional individual. Additionally, the immaterial motivations and methods of achieving of the material body 's pursuits, be those pursuits as basic as shelter, warmth and food, or as complex as a presidential campaign, both exhibit traits that are specific to an individual and constitutes personal
There are several things in life that can hold value to a person. One object can be just an object to one person while at the same time be so much more to a different person. In the short story Janus, the object that Andrea had fixated on is a simple bowl. She is obsessed with the bowl, thinking about it all of the time and worrying about it. It is not hard to see that the bowl was something much more to her than any other ordinary object.
Descartes assumed first that it was God, who deceived us, but with the conclusion that God is all-good, he instead conclude that an evil demon exist. This evil demon possess the same power to deceive us, which God also would possess. God is perfect. Since humans have the ability to think of a being more perfect then themselves, then this being must have planted the idea in our mind. With the knowledge now that God is existing, perfect and is a non-deceiver – due to him being all-good –, Descartes can now move on to explain why material objects
Logically speaking, Hume’s theory makes the most sense due to the knowledge learned from cause and effect. I understand the relationship between the beginning to its adjacent cause and it applies to everyday life in society. Unlike Hume, Descartes suggests the origin of knowledge is logical and through self-doubt. Yet, he is unable to provide proof of the existence of god despite playing a substantial role in his theory.