Aristotle And Plato Similarities

946 Words4 Pages
We can easily compare the ideologies of, Plato and Aristotle, two of the most imperious Greek Philosophers of their times as they principally spoke about same subjects. They have written a lot of theories in the field of Epistemology and Knowledge.

Plato was motivated by Socrates, his teacher, one of the greatest philosopher of all times. Aristotle was motivated by his teacher, Pluto, even though he was the strong critic of him too, as his theories had many flaws. Despite this their works are easily comparable as they target the same aspects of philosophy even if the bulk of points are conflicting.

“Both Plato and Aristotle based their theories on four widely accepted beliefs of the time; knowledge must be of what is real, the world experienced
…show more content…
He believed that the real world exist around us here down on Earth. He also felt that we cannot eliminate human selfishness, that’s our nature. We need to acknowledge it, as it is part of who we are. It persuades us to do better in life, also to advance and progress in life. He wanted people to work in a well-balanced environment to make world an exceptional place to live.
Plato and Aristotle both established their theories mainly on knowledge. Plato was the pioneer of the written conversation and combative forms in philosophy, which emerge with him. He proposed that the soul of every creature is confined in his body. Basically soul bears the knowledge since birth but it comes out with due course. I feel such feud are amusing to speculate but can’t be pursued in this real word. They can be amusing, prolific and innovative to review but cannot be followed.
On the other hand, Aristotle being a realist, takes a methodical and systematic approach. According to him whatever we see is the real world. We capture knowledge in due course in our
…show more content…
Aristotle does not agree with this idea of the human condition and so uses biology as the paradigm for knowledge. This encloses his view that knowledge need not be of the eternal but by observing the world around us we can be improve our knowledge.
Although Plato was of the belief that any approach had a universally broad and excellent form in philosophy Aristotle concluded that all universal forms are independent and should be analysed on their own. This frame of reference led to Aristotelian Empiricism. Whereas Plato thought that experiments and reasoning are enough to provide the qualities of an object, Aristotle was in favour of the experience and observation.
In logic, Plato was more favoured the use of inductive reasoning, while Aristotle used deductive reasoning. The syllogism, a basic unit of logic of A = B, and B = C, then A = C, was developed by Aristotle. Both regarded that thoughts were far more preferable to senses. However Plato stated that senses could fool a person but Aristotle believed that senses are required to establish reality in a proper way. This was very clearly explained in the Allegory of cave conceived by Plato. He was of the view that world was like a cave and people assume that shadows from the outside light is the only reality. But Aristotle gave a solution that walking out of the cave and experiencing the reasons for those shadows is the
Get Access