Aristotle's Concept Of Human Flourishing And Moral Virtue

1095 Words5 Pages
Aristotle’s concept of human flourishing and moral virtue is a viable alternative to other ethical theories, even though it is not a prescriptive for ethical decision making. To understand this concept, one must first understand that individuals have freedom of choice. Therefore this allows for a great diversity of life that is around. Allowing choices means that the human race is not all going to be the same following a deontological, or even a utilitarian way of life. There are a few different ethical ways of living life, although they do not allow for the freedom of the individual to learn through their own experiences, to experience life as they choose. This is supported by a multitude of academia texts including the works of Nicomachean Ethics written by Aristotle, and Aristotle’s Function Argument Written By Christine M. Korsgaard.

Firstly, to understand Aristotle’s concept of human flourishing and moral virtue and how it is a viable alternative to other ethical theories, even though it is not a prescriptive for ethical decision making. One needs to understand the concept of Aristoltle’s Human Flourishing. To begin with, human flourishing is a terminology used to describe the overall summarization of an individuals whole, life and that people endeavour to be whatever they attempt in life, and to bring themselves the greatest good that they can do within their lives. Human flourishing is a subjective view of life, therefore making it impossible for one life to be the
Open Document