Politics and Confucius Fusion
Aristotle ( 384-322 B.C.) was a Greek philosopher and political scientist born in Stagira, Greece, who focused mainly on politics and made significant contributions to various fields in knowledge such as ethics and biology. Many of his opinions and thoughts regarding politics are expressed throughout his work the Politics Book I from 350 B.C. Unlike Aristotle, Kongzi (551 - 479 B.C.) was an ancient Chinese politician, who introduces Confucius, a teaching that was built to establish the social values, and transcendental ideals of traditional Chinese society. In the Analects of Confucius, students of Kongzi discuss about the doctrine of Kongzi and his goal to rebuild the Golden Age. Despite their similar thoughts and opinions regarding the the accumulation of wealth such as
…show more content…
However, Kongzi believes that the ruler stimulates virtue in his followers but Aristotle believes that it depends on people’s decision to aim for it individually. From their teaching of wealth the readers can conclude that it is part of the human instinct to desire wealth. Unfortunately, it could either be a blessing or a curse depending on how some decided to acquire it. Eliminating the thought of gaining profit from the improper acquisition of wealth can prevent one from becoming corrupted. However, is it really possible to create society with uncorrupted people when making money in the unethical way is the fastest method to gain wealth? Someone can make a thousand dollars in a day by kidnapping a child from a wealthy family while it might take a baker approximately a month to make the same amount. Why are people who owns a quantity of money considered rich when the one who has less materialistic possessions and has more knowledge, a good family, and basic necessities in life should be considered the most
There are many interpretations when it comes to the word rich. One could be rich in intellect or possibly rich in loving others. Authors often use these different definitions to make a reader think more when reading a story. When reading the title of the story, "The Rich Brother,” many readers will first assume that Pete is the rich brother because of his monetary wealth; conversely, a deeper analyzation of the story reveals that Donald is the rich brother because of the author’s non-stereotypical interpretation of the word “rich.” In the first paragraph, the author tells the reader of Pete’s monetary wealth when it says he “worked hard and made a lot of money.”
Society don't care where the money comes from, because it makes a person seem successful. Whoever doesn't have much according to them, is a lazy and useless
Political philosophy is defined as the study of fundamental questions that arise when people think about the state, government, politics, liberty, and justice. The founder of western philosophy, Socrates explores the ideas of government, ethics and liberty. The classical Greek philosopher focused on the individual and the connection between the freedom and t individuality. His exploration and questions challenged other to do the same in many other aspects of life. Socrates defiance of the structure and order of Athens at the time inspired other Philosophers to create ideas about government and authority such as Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes.
The wealthier one gets, it seems, the more one rationalizes their decisions and actions. The more one stains their morality little by little until they no longer need to choose what’s right and wrong but what benefits them. Whether it’s right or wrong is then irrelevant. From people to companies, wealth is the source of
Aristo lived in 4th century BC in today’s Greece, developed ideas on several subjects from logic and metaphysics to empirical biology. Confucius, on the other hand, had lived in today’s China in 6th century BC, and was a political thinker and educator whose work mostly focused on the ideal social order and ethics. These two distinct philosophers both left extensive ideas on how political and social order should be. This paper will compare and contrast these two influential thinkers in terms of their ideas on individual ethics and social order. The thinkers’ works on various subjects will not be included to this analysis due to the length limitations and the need to focus on the themes that are studies by both of them.
He also believed that political order would be found by the proper ordering of human relationships. He said that a good government must be filed with people who are well educated and consciences people which are called Junzi. Chinese people built temples to commemorate Confucius. Confucius temples are also called Kong Miao in Chinese. Temples are where people of confucianism worship, and the most known temple is Qufu in Shandong Province.
Wealth has been the focus of almost all economic inquiry because most economic activity aims to produce wealth, if not for private, individual use, then for public consumption or for use as capital for further production. The idea of wealth has changed over time, however. In the early preclassical and the preclassical times, the wealth of states and countries was measured differently from how it is measured today. Before the industrial revolution had taken place, agriculture was the main mode of production, and the philosopher-economists and thinkers, unsurprisingly, thought about wealth in terms of agricultural output and costs of production. Scholasticism was a movement led by priests and members of the church, who wrote and published many pamphlets and books about combining the economic activity at the time with religious guidelines as set by the Bible.
Their rationalities are still being used today. They were incredible masterminds with awesome impact in the antiquated society. Confucianism imparts to Aristotle mindfulness that for people to be great, they require moral astuteness and in addition different demeanors of character, yet Confucianism places more prominent accentuation on the part of reflection and concentrate in the improvement of good insight (Provis, 2017). Over the next several paragraphs, it is my goal to address the following: 1)
If you have the right kind of thoughts, you will get what you want. The wealthy people have only successful thoughts hence why they only seem to get wealthier by the day. Poor people on the other hand, seem to languish in more poverty. Yes, because they only think of themselves as so. This is not their fault though.
Wealth is concentrated on a few super-rich while the majority of the people are the middle class and the
As Confucius states, “if good men were to govern the domain for a hundred years, they could wipe out violence and put an end to killing,” (Analects 90). While Aristotle and Confucius disagreed on the role of law in society—Aristotle thought that laws could make people moral where Confucius thought that if people could respect their leaders, then they would try to emulate them—the ideas of the two are more similar than they are
Although both Confucius and Mencius have a lot in common with regards to governance, the two do have varying opinions on certain matters such as the legitimacy when rulers are overthrown, and the relationship between the ruler and his people. In precedence to coming up with policies and administrative measures, one has to first consider the issue of human nature as it plays an essential role in the development of a state 's political system. In the Confucian philosophy, the belief is that goodness is innate in humans and that everyone shares this same trait [子曰:“性相近也,习相远也。”] (Analects, 17.2). Mencius further elaborated on this doctrine by stating that it is mankind’s natural tendency to be kind to others, just as water would naturally flow downwards (Mencius, 6A2).
Caputo says that religious people are “hyper-realists, in love with the impossible, and they will not rest until the impossible happens, which is impossible…” (Caputo 92). So, the reason why Caputo labels religious people as impossible people is because religious people are constantly trying to defy and redefine the impossible. According to Caputo, the critics don’t do anything constructive, let alone anything that warrants the impossible. I can see a connection to Matthew 19:24 and the quote that you gave from Caputo.
The idea of living within a high class society and the illusion of control becomes appealing to many. Perhaps this is a tactic they use to lure more people to follow them? For instance, George Wilson’s wife, Myrtle has an affair with Tom Buchanan because she was attracted to his wealth and she dreamed of living a life full of excess. “The modern individual is produced by a power that individualizes precisely in order to better control (1470).” In this case, it is apparent that the wealthy individuals went to great lengths to acquire substantial wealth so that they could oppress the disadvantaged members to meet their societal goals.
As the phrases, “ Money and desire are great servant but as a bad master”. ii. Materialism can also push a person to break rules to get what he wants. A person can resorts to fraud and crime. Instead of earning money from honest work, these people prefer to lay their hands on money the easy way which in turn makes life miserable and fearful to others.