ipl-logo

Aristotle Prudence And Justice Essay

748 Words3 Pages

When it comes to Aristotle he has a particular theory on prudence as a virtue of thought. He believes that prudence which requires virtue is knowledge of what is just. It involves good deliberation focused on human good and helping human concerns universally, ultimately living well in general. So, a person who is prudent shall grasp the truth. With that being said even though prudence is necessary, it is not sufficient for a virtuous life. Or in other words, being prude is not enough to dwell in happiness. Aristotle believes that prudence is necessary for virtuous justice, but you need habit, as well as knowledge of the particulars, moral luck, and external goods. Although none of these things alone equals happiness, if you put them all together …show more content…

Aristotle believes that experience is necessary; and what is known to us and our experiences leads to the human good, which is why what leads to happiness can so widely vary. Virtuous actions also known as habits impacts your character. If you have good character your weakness of will is avoided because we use habit to make decisions and to deliberate. On to my next point which is the relation between prudence and justice. From Aristotle’s point of view justice is the most important virtue; And there is no difference between political science and ethics because its all a matter of justice. For example, if an unjust person breaks the law, the law must be just. To explain, Justice is fair vs unfair, where fair means lawfulness, following the law, it’s a matter of convention. Whereas to be unfair is not having equality or treating everyone the same. Being just is proportionate but unjust is unproportionate. Justice is the only virtue that focuses on another persons’ good because it focuses on everyone being treated

Show More
Related

  • Genuine Happiness In Shooting Dogs

    299 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the movie “Shooting Dogs” there were 3 distinct characters that closely resemble the ways Aristotle, Kant and Levinas lived their lives on a daily basis. In the movie, Father Christopher is a priest that represents Aristotle and his ways of finding happiness in the community. Also, the Belgian Soldier shows human action by doing good just for the sake of his duty, similar to Kant. Finally, Joe is the local elementary school teacher who created strong relationships with many people in Rwanda. Aristotle was philosopher that truly believed that happiness is the goal of living, and we must distinguish the difference between pleasure and happiness.

    Read More

  • Aristotle Just And Unjust Analysis

    1082 Words  | 5 Pages

    Aristotle, on the other hand, had a much more positive outlook on the applicability of his political theory. In many ways, his ideal ideology would look much like Plato’s, although with a more guided and empirical approach. Aristotle, like Plato, argued that the state was not only necessary, but essential to the happiness of its people, because the state was the only means by which the city could achieve happiness. According to Aristotle, “the best good is apparently something complete” and likewise, that “happiness more than anything else seems complete without qualification” (Nicomachean Ethics, 205) and “everyone aims at living well and at happiness” (Politics, 315). Furthermore, he argued that “happiness is an activity of the soul expressing

    Read More

  • The Role Of Friendship In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    46 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Book eight and nine of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics Aristotle addresses the topic of friendship. Aristotle’s argument is that friends should be regarded as second selves. Aristotle believes that as virtuous behavior improves an individual, friendship has the potential to make improvements in each other’s lives.

    Read More

  • Thrasymachus's View Of Justice

    370 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates believes that justice is the best life to live, but Glaucon is not satisfied by this answer and instead creates an improved defense of Thrasymachus’ argument that life of injustice is better than living a life of justice. Glaucon argues that people are just because it is convenient, it is a title that people have been taught to be, however, it is much easier to be unjust than just. Justice is set up like a competition in which the result is merely a compromise of the best and worst of a group of individuals. What constitutes something as just or not lies in the consequence. Justice is merely a system which is instrumentally valuable.

    Read More

  • Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    The just person’s soul entails motive for certain kinds of objects the most important of which is knowledge. Socrates describes the hardship and extreme effort required to gain knowledge of the forms and the form of the good, thus the just person will seek learning and not spend time to take care of the satisfaction of desires that typically lead to unjust actions. This approach to unite the gap between a just soul and just actions may have some drawbacks. One negative aspect may be that several unjust actions may be motivated by desires that are compatible with the desire for knowledge. For example, why wouldn’t a person with a great fascination for knowledge steal a book if it would contribute to their

    Read More

  • Martha Nussbaum's Argument Analysis

    1217 Words  | 5 Pages

    When it comes to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, I believe that he has found a common thread in humanity in the fact that humans strive for the moderate in living virtuously. However, I would argue that the thread is varied enough to have no true worth in discerning the aspects of humanity. People have too different moralities and goals. Because Aristotle allows for these “local variations”, as Martha Nussbaum later terms in her defense of Aristotle, he is acknowledging that there cannot be an overarching analysis of humanity.

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics

    1819 Words  | 8 Pages

    “Every skill and every inquiry, and similarly every action and rational choice, is thought to aim at some good; and so the good has been aptly described as that which everything aims. But it is clear that there is some difference between ends: some ends are activities, while others are products which are additional to the activities. In cases where there are ends additional to the actions, the products are by their nature better than activities.” (Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, as translated by Crisp, 2000, p. #3) Aristotle was the first philosopher who wrote a book on ethics titled, Nichomachean Ethics.

    Read More

  • Aristotle: Justice And Happiness

    1108 Words  | 5 Pages

    Philosophers have debated the distinct subjects such as justice and happiness extensively. For instance, Plato discusses the subject of justice by arguing that justice is what allows people to live excellently. In contrast, Aristotle discusses happiness by arguing that acquiring virtues enables people to achieve the ultimate goal of happiness. What is the meaning of the terms justice and happiness? The term happiness could be elucidated as a satisfaction from goals achieved or from one’s status.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    1025 Words  | 5 Pages

    Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics begins by exploring ‘the good’. Book I argues that, unlike other goods, “happiness appears to be something complete and self-sufficient, and is, therefore, the end of actions” (10:1097b20-21). In other words, happiness is the ultimate good. But how does one achieve happiness? Aristotle formulates this in the context of work, since for all things, from artists to horses, “the good and the doing it well seem to be in the work” (10:1097b27-28).

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Aristotle And Utilitarianism

    1413 Words  | 6 Pages

    Many classical philosophers have given their voice to the nature of human life and what entails its climax. The very nature of human beings has been investigated, broadly, to establish a comprehensive understanding often pegged on morality. Yet, such thoughts have prompted diverse viewpoints with accompanying grounds or reasons. Happiness is an unending topic of discussion in philosophy. This paper explores the similarities and differences in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism to coin a position in whether or not happiness is the ultimate end that human society aspires to acquire.

    Read More

  • Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics Argument

    1210 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thus, when human function is done well, it is in accordance with virtue and best human life is achieved. In addition, it can be inferred that since Aristotle’s definition of happiness is to be virtuous, performing rational activity well can lead to happiness. In addition, Aristotle states, “if there are more than one virtue, in accordance with the best and most complete” (1098a18). This means that eventually there will be one virtue that is inclusive of all virtue and that displays an end, and this virtue will be in line with the self-sufficient and inclusive concept of happiness as the chief good. If this inclusive virtue and good is achieved, ultimate happiness will be achieved as well.

    Read More

  • Voluntary And Ignorance In Aristotle's Nicomanchean Ethics

    1287 Words  | 6 Pages

    Therefore, if one wishes to be healthy, he can choose to eat healthy and practice sports, but his choice of being healthy just by its own will not predict the outcome of actually being healthy. Conclusively, “choice relates to the means and wish relates rather to the end”. Additionally, Aristotle also expatiates on anger and appetite. These characteristics, for Aristotle are related to pleasure and feelings which are themselves relate to all animals. However, choice is not for that choice is only related to rational beings.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Socrates And Aristotle

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    Socrates and Aristotle, despite being related through Plato, are in fact very different people and have many differing theories. Socrates outlook on life was that we 're all inherently good, but we will do bad things on accident. For example, when talking about ignorance, Socrates believes that we do not willingly do anything wrong. We instead have two branches of ignorance: not knowing something and knowing that you don 't know, or not knowing but you think that you do know (Plato, P.561). Aristotle on the other hand, claims that there is a different outlook on the model of ignorance.

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Citizenship

    1750 Words  | 7 Pages

    (Ethics 938). It is not enough to state that one is virtuous, nor is it enough for someone to be born virtuous and end there. Rather, it is the continuous pursuit, the juxtaposition of virtuous activity and of that which isn’t, that allows an individual to flourish in an Aristotelian society. We can deduce, then, that “…human

    Read More

  • Aristotle Good Life Analysis

    1839 Words  | 8 Pages

    Plato claimed that virtue is a type of knowledge since qualities are only beneficial when they are accompanied by knowledge. Virtue is always beneficial, thus, it must be a form of knowledge. If virtue is knowledge, vice – being the opposite of virtue – must be the lack of knowledge. As with every ethical system, Aristotle’s theory is subject to some criticism.

    Read More

More about Aristotle Prudence And Justice Essay

Open Document