ipl-logo

Plato's Concept Of Justice Essay

1451 Words6 Pages

According to Levinson pg.158 (1977), “Justice is primarily a possible, but not a necessary, quality of a social order regulating the mutual relations of men”. Justice can also be termed as the permanent and timeless wish to which every individual his rendered freedom, equality and other basic rights in the state.

As a result of its importance, prominent and knowledgeable people have shared their views on justice and what it means and how the state is involved in its administration. The likes of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke among others have written extensively on the concept of justice.

According to Socrates, He saw justice as a way of preserving the state. The state is a law-abiding and constitutional elementary existence, and for that humans deserve to give their deepest respect and highest loyalty. From point of view Socrates saw that an eligible citizen of the state must abide or obey the laws of the state. Justice could not be only obeying the laws of the state but in exchange for others to obey as …show more content…

He presumes true that everything in life as an aim, so as we humans have our special aims to help us attain our maximum happiness. life He sat and analyzed the concept of human happiness on the bottom of his debate and justifies the concept of justice as the basis of an individual’s life. Following him, “justice is considered to mean equity, but does not invariably mean equality; justice is relative to persons being equal and a just distribution is one in which the relative values of things given correspond to those of the person receiving” (Amytage 2013 pg.81). Observing Aristotle’s view, man’s happiness is the life of the soul. The harmony of justice in an individual and society is equal to the enjoyment of values. To him justice is fair, individuals who do good are treated fairly but individuals who disobey the law are treated

Show More
Related

  • Socrates Argue Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    342 Words  | 2 Pages

    the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame

    Read More

  • Just Trial In Plato's Apology

    948 Words  | 4 Pages

    To fight for justice, one must be careful with how he does it. Socrates may have lived a long life, but he went about his fight for injustice incredibly wrong. There must have been a way for him to appear before the senate or the town lawfully and pitch his ideas politically. Instead, he took the approach of going around town telling the Athenians that they were unwise and causing a disturbance. Socrates chose the illegal path in his fight for justice.

    Read More

  • Thrasymachus Definition Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

    2106 Words  | 9 Pages

    In the Republic, Plato confers with other philosophers about the true definition of justice. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus relay their theories on justice to Plato, when he inquires as to what justice is. Cephalus believes only speaking the truth and paying one’s debts is the correct definition of justice (The Republic, Book I). However, Plato refutes this with an example of a friend who has lost his wits and would be caused harm by repayment of a debt. This leads to Polemarchus’ view on justice, doing harm to one’s enemies and helping one’s friends.

    Read More

  • Socrates: Plato's Decision To Accepting The Death Penalty

    1434 Words  | 6 Pages

    Therefore, since Athens has a part to play in corrupting Socrates’s life as well as his mistaken visual of the truth, Socrates must understand that by obeying the state, he has done injustice to his soul for it will not be in true harmony. Furthermore he will be doing an injustice to the state because Plato would have established that, objectively, Athens laws are unjust and even if Socrates thinks that they are just, it is only because Socrates has been corrupted by

    Read More

  • Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    I think that there is a fallacy of irrelevance. In the book, Socrates sets out to defend the idea that it is always in one’s best interest to be just and to act justly and he suggests that the just person as one who has a balanced soul will lead one to act justly or why mental health amounts to justice. I feel that justice includes actions in relation to others, it includes considerations of other people’s good, and includes strong motivations not to act unjustly. I believe that Socrates’ defense of justice does not include constraining reasons to think that a person with a balanced soul will refrain from acts that are commonly thought to be unjust like theft, murder, and adultery.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Polemarchus 'Justice In Socrates'

    770 Words  | 4 Pages

    When it comes to justice, Polemarchus believes that justice is “…helping friends and harming enemies.”. Socrates questions this point of view because according to Polemarchus’ view point, only the people who are close to him and in his circle of friends would be worthy of any kind of Justice. Polemarchus is wrong in this viewpoint because if only the people that you know who are of your similar social status and you interact with on a day to day basis are considered friends, what of those that you do not know? Or what of those who are not of your social status, that you do not interact with? Socrates questions this by asking, “Do you mean by friends those who seem to be good to an individual, or those who are, even if they don't seem to be, and similar with enemies?”.

    Read More

  • Justice Theory In Elie Wiesel's Night

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    Justice is derived from the root word just, meaning agreeing to what is considered morally right or good; treating people in a way that is morally right; or reasonable or proper. However, society has become so entangled up in the power which certain individuals possess, they forget all about what is “just”. The justice theory is that justice is at the advantage of the stronger. When an individual is described or depicted as being “strong”, that individual is typically of a larger build, possesses some sort of weapon that causes them to be mighty, and is typically large in size. No matter what circumstances arise, these individuals are expected to be victorious in each battle they fight.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Jr And Socrates Comparison Essay

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    He held that upright life is the only life worth living. To him, justice was a matter of knowledge and hence, a truth aspect. Meanwhile, he honored and acknowledged his duty to obey the Laws of the state. From Socrates' perspective, Laws are absolute.

    Read More

  • Socrates Vs. Unjust One In Plato's The Republic

    643 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Plato’s, The Republic, Book I, Socrates tries to prove to Thrasymachus “whether just people also live better and are happier than unjust ones” (352d). He argues that everything has a predisposed proficiency at a function, and that this functions are performed well by the peculiar virtue and badly by means of its vice (353a-353d) . The point of this paper is to present Socrates argument and evaluate it to the best of my ability. This argument can be categorized as an inductive generalization. Socrates states that the function of anything is what it alone can do or what it does best.

    Read More

  • Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

    1382 Words  | 6 Pages

    Socrates bases this view of justice on the worth of living a good life. “And is life worth living for us with that part of us corrupted by unjust actions” (47e) If we corrupt our soul with injustice, our life would not be worth living, therefore one must never commit an injustice. “When one has come to an agreement that is just with someone, one should fulfill it.”(49e) It is this agreement with the Laws that Socrates would be violating, if he were to

    Read More

  • Argument Of Justice In Plato's Book 1 Of The Republic

    732 Words  | 3 Pages

    He uses the example of ruling a city, where a government would change the rules and laws to best suit them, and as the rules are followed by those who act justly, the just would be acting in the favour of the stronger. Socrates objects to this and claims that humans will make mistake, as that is part of being human, and may

    Read More

  • Suffering Injustice In Plato's Gorgias

    1151 Words  | 5 Pages

    This claim that it is better to suffer injustice than commit injustice raises the question of why would any person want to receive injustice, but that is not Socrates argument. Socrates understands that receiving injustice is not something that is enviable, but when compared to committing injustice, suffering injustice is better because committing injustice is pitiable and unenviable. Socrates never fully explains his reasoning for this claim but it deals with this idea of getting back

    Read More

  • Examples Of Justice In The Scarlet Letter

    1646 Words  | 7 Pages

    This concept states that all individuals must be treated equally. Laws are made with the intent of establishing justice, but that is not always the case. I agree with this quote because following laws does not always mean justice is being served. Laws define what is right and what is wrong, while justice also takes into consideration the circumstances of the situation at that time. Nathanial Hawthorne’s

    Read More

  • Plato: An Analysis Of Plato's The Republic

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his book “The Republic”, Plato argues vis-à-vis Socrates that the philosopher is, in fact, the happiest person. He draws this conclusion when he compares it against that of a money-lover and an honour-lover. This paper will expound on the argument put forth by Socrates and in doing so will provide the reasons for my support of his argument. In Book 9 of “The Republic”, Socrates wants to find out the type of person that enjoys the most pleasant life and therefore, suggests that the soul of each individual be divided into three parts: the appetitive, the spirited and the rational.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Aristotle And Martin Seligman

    908 Words  | 4 Pages

    At the end of everyone’s lives, the goal appears to be about attaining happiness. Describing how to obtain happiness has been an issue that was debated in the past but is still talked about now . In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on his view of happiness and he focuses particularly on how reason helps recognize and pursue what will lead to happiness and the good life. I feel that Aristotle’s philosophies on happiness are important works within the field of philosophy and he considered one of the………of it . In this paper, I will explore Aristotle’s beliefs regarding happiness then compare and contrast them to those of Martin Seligman.

    Read More

More about Plato's Concept Of Justice Essay

Open Document