Bigger athletic departments for instance Georgia, Alabama, Ohio State, and Oregon may possibly be able to award stipends to each one of their athletes, both female and male, this includes profit-generating sports and non profit-generating sports. Nevertheless in 2009-10 there were only 22 of 120 FBS athletic departments that turned in a profit, according to the NCAA. So where does the money come from at an East Carolina University that needed $8.2 million pulled from the University general trust to support its budget, or what about a Arizona Sate University or Boston College University. Can these schools afford to pay their players let alone the rest of their athletes? Arizona Sate University has roughly around 500 athletes in 21 sports. Now
College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the
College Athletes Compensation How would you feel if you were to perform and work as hard as you could but have all of the money that results from your hard work go to someone else, and you get none of it? Division I college athletes not being compensated for their efforts is a major problem. Universities and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) profit around $6 billion annually off of college athletes; meanwhile these athletes do not see any of this money and may even go to bed hungry. These student athletes put their bodies and health on the line when they step out for their sports and often have to pay a lifetime of medical bills, and do not get any help with this. When trying to provide for themselves, students are
Between Tv deals, ticket sales, and jersey sales there is plenty of money to go around in college athletics, and it is time that the NCAA steps up and compensates athletes. College athletes are stuck in a brief conflict where they think they deserve to be paid just like the pros do. They consider their sport as a job and think they deserve to be paid just like the coaches do. Colleges make a lot of their money through the sports department. Ticket sales are a big way colleges bring in big money.
What the colleges are willing to give the athletes most likely not be the amount the athlete wants. Paying athletes will create tension between the athletes and make them want to go where the most money is, rather than where they will benefit best. The smaller schools would not have the opportunity of having great players on their teams. Tensions could lead athletes to quit their sport or file a lawsuit against the school concerning their pay. College athletes have tutors they can call right away if they need help academically, or financially.
College athletes are not receiving a physical paycheck; instead they are receiving a scholarship that is worth much
If the NCAA can earn millions of dollars from student athletes, shouldn’t athletes retain their fair share? NCAA Student Athletes deserve to be paid because their hard work and time is the driving force behind the profit and popularity of the NCAA. All of the ticket and merchandise sales, television revenue, promotions, and other sources of income go to the NCAA, the schools, the coaches, the event staff, and others involved – except for the athletes creating the value of the NCAA. The NCAA finished the 2014 campaign with just under $1 Billion in revenue, which is more than the NHL and NBA.
I looked at the highest-paid college athletes and the top 10 go from 3.4 million to 1.4 million a year, how do they get paid you may ask, they run branded training clinics,
This is because the athletes that come to the university are now a walking advertisement. If a school sends many multiple people pro in sports every year then they will be more likely to land the big name recruits and therefore the school will make money off of that player helping his team to a championship. These are all reasons why college athletes should be paid. To conclude, college athletes deserve more. Yes they are given scholarships, yes they are given an opportunity to change their situation and their future.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
In their journal “The Case of Paying College Athletes”, John Siegfried and Allen Sanderson point out many discrepancies in NCAA policies, but do not support monetary payment. They argue: “College athletes are in fact currently paid, in the sense that the majority receive grants-in-aid that cover most – although not all – of their college expenses.” (Pg. 127). After this statement, the authors detail the demanding payments varying depending on each college
Most of the money would go to high-attention sports, like men’s basketball and football.ProCon.org, a well-known supply of information on several topics, mentioned in “Paying College Athletes-Top 3 pros and Cons’’ that “the remaining scholarships would be distributed to top football and men’s basketball players because those two sports bring in the most revenue”. Universities would struggle to pay everyone, as the revenue brought in would be unequally distributed. This would be unfair to those athletes in the smaller programs because they have worked just as hard to be where they are. Another problem is the lack of funding from the smaller programs to pay the athletes. US News Digital Weekly revealed in “Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid?” that “The truth is that only a fraction of the programs is profitable while most operate at a cost to the institution” (Mitchell).
Have you ever thought about how those hardworking college athletes get through their years attending their University? Well, what if I told you that those athletes can barely get the essentials needed day by day because the scholarships they have received do not cover it and they don 't have any other money to buy it themselves. The debate whether or not College athletes should be paid for their time at the university they attend has been talked about a lot in these past years. Some people think that they should not be paid, but today I’m going to be telling you about why they should be paid. Athletes that are very well known by the fans of the university and or with lots of other people around the world like Lonzo Ball of UCLA, Dillon Brooks of Oregon, Markelle Fultz of Washington, etc.