Arizona V. Case Briefs
Brief
Arizona v. Hicks
480 U.S. 321 (1987)
Facts:
A bullet was fired through the floor of Hick’s apartment on April 18th, 1987. The bullet injured a man in the apartment below Hick’s apartment. Police officers arrived at Hick’s apartment to investigate the shooting. Upon investigating, the police officers seized 3 weapons and a stocking mask. Also, while investigating, one of the police officers noticed expensive stereo equipment. Officer Nelson suspected that this equipment was stolen so he recorded the serial numbers. To do this, Officer Nelson had to move through other items including a turntable which he also suspected to be stolen. Officer Nelson’s suspicions were correct as it was confirmed that the equipment was indeed stolen.
The Case Of Brian James Ferry V. City Of Tucson
676 Words | 3 PagesOn Feb. 2, 2002 a couple from Phoenix left on a trip to Tucson and were never heard from again – but now, a little more than 16 years later, Brian James Ferry stands accused of the alleged murders of Charles Martin Russell and Catherine Nelson. According to the Nicol Green, a prosecuting lawyer, Russell and Nelson drove up to Tucson to purchase a motorcycle being sold by Ferry. He had placed a false advertisement in the Arizona Republic and was selling the nonexistent motorcycle for $12,000.
Hernandez V. Arizona Board Of Regents Case Brief
1228 Words | 5 PagesLeonel Torres (Group #1) BUS3 80 09/08/14 Case Brief Case Name: Hernandez v. Arizona Board of Regents, 172 Ariz. 244; 866 P.2d 1330; 1994Ariz. LEXIS 6 Arizona Supreme Court, 1994. Facts: A fraternity from the University of Arizona gained new members to their organization, on August 27, 1988. The fraternity was accustomed to serving alcoholic beverages to those members who help fund the drinks.
Chimel Vs. California Case Study
455 Words | 2 PagesTitle: Chimel v. California Date/Court: United States Supreme Court, 1969 Facts: This case deals with Ted Chimel, who they suspected robbed a local coin shop. On September 13, 1965, several officers from Santa Ana came to the home of Chimel with an arrest warrant for his expected involvement in the burglary. The officers arrived at the door and identified themselves to Chimel’s wife and asked if they could come into the home, she agreed and showed them into the house. While in the house the officers waited 10-15 minutes until Chimel came home from work.
Civil Court Case: Horton V. California
247 Words | 1 PagesCase: Horton v. California Citation: 496 U.S. 128 (1990) Year Decided: 1990 Facts: After obtaining a warrant for stolen items from an armed robbery, a California police officer searched petitioner Horton’s home. The officer had described both the weapons used and property stolen in the affidavit for the search warrant, but the Magistrate issuing the warrant only authorized a search for the stolen property. Even though the police did not discover the stolen property, weapons matching the officer’s description were found in plain view and seized. Horton ended up being convicted of armed robbery after a motion to suppress the seized evidence was denied by the trial court.
Incident Case Scenario: A Case Of Alysha Rosario
353 Words | 2 PagesOn 7-22-2016, I, Richard Reyes was dispatched to a call for criminal trespassing at 12625 Wetmore Rd, San Antonio, TX. at approximately 0800 hours. I arrived on site at 0818 hours, where there were 2 men arguing inside of the class room. I was accompanied by back-up officer Alysha Rosario, we separated the two men from each other and asked the suspect Johnny McGregor to step outside, and the Officer Rosario spoke with him and gathered his story. I stayed inside of the classroom and spoke with the victim Jose Robledo about the incident, where Jose explained to me that his step-brother Johnny has been using the car and has not been adding gas to it.
Lawrence Vs Texas 539 Case Study
340 Words | 2 PagesLawrence v. Texas 539 US 558 (2003) Case Facts: In September 1998, a same-sex couple in Houston, Texas were arrested in their own apartment after police found them engaging in a consensual, intimate, sexual act. The two men, John Lawrence and Tyron Garner, were convicted of violating the Texas “Homosexual Conduct” Law, which made it a Class-C misdemeanor for same-sex adults to engage in sexual intercourse and considered it illegal sodonomy. The statute was created in 1973 after the state changed its criminal code to end the banning of heterosexual anal or oral sex. The sheriff deputies arrested and charged the couple for performing “deviate sexual intercourse” as listed in the mentioned in the Texas statute.
Thompson Vs Arizona Case Summary
1003 Words | 5 PagesIn Arizona, relocation of a minor child when there is a written agreement or court order between two parents (both residing in the state of Arizona), is regulated by Arizona Revised Statute 25-408. In most cases, application of this statute’s regulations becomes necessary when one parent wishes to relocate with the minor child out of state. In some cases, such as Thompson v. Thompson, the statute can be cited in relation to relocation within the state of Arizona. A Brief History of the Case: Thompson v. Thompson:
Supreme Court Case: The Case Of Mapp Vs. Ohio
354 Words | 2 PagesThe case of Mapp vs. Ohio is a case of illegal search and seizure. It went to the Supreme Court in 1961. It is important to today’s society because it might mean the difference between guilty and innocent. I agree with the Supreme Court because it is illegal to access private property without a warrant or consent. The case lasted until June 19, 1961.
Aguilar Vs Texas Case Analysis
731 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis of issues in the motion to suppress. Argument a) The police relied on the information provided by CRI-2 to form the ground for an affidavit seeking to obtain a search warrant. The information from CRI-2 was not credible and could not be independently be relied upon or verified.
Newdow Supreme Court Case Summary
667 Words | 3 PagesThe case was implied a Magistrate Judge, whose brief discoveries and recommendation completed up, and "the Pledge does not slight the Establishment Clause. " The District Court grasped that proposition and released the protestation on July 21, 2000. The Court of Appeals turned around and issued three separate choices talking about the benefits and Newdow 's standing. As it would see it, the offers court consistently held that Newdow has remaining as a watchman to challenge a practice that meddles with his qualification to facilitate the religious direction of his daughter. That holding managed Newdow 's remaining to challenge not only the game plan of the school locale, where his young lady still is enrolled, moreover the 1954 Act of
Lopez Case: The United States V. Lopez
285 Words | 2 PagesThe United States v. Lopez case was about Alfonzo Lopez, a 12th grade student from San Antonio, who came to school carrying a hidden weapon. Under Texas law he was charged with possession of a firearm. Later on he was dismissed of this violation and was later charged with “federal criminal statute”. He was found violating “ The Gun-Free School Act”, which was created in 1990. His sentence was 6 months in prison and two years of being supervised while being released.
Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Gonzales Vs. Castle Rock
704 Words | 3 PagesThe Supreme Court case of Gonzales v. Castle Rock pertains to the enforcement of a restraining order by the Castle Rock Police Department, and the murder of three young children (Gonzales v. Castle Rock, No. 04-278, 2005). Previously, Jessica Gonzales sought a restraining against her estranged husband Simon Gonzalez because his behavior was scaring her and the children. Furthermore, listed in the testimony of the restraining order, Jessica revealed the facts concerning Simon's disturbing behavior beginning with his attempted suicide in front of her and the girls (Leung, 2005). Additionally, Jessica listed in the restraining order that Simon stalked and broke into their home on several occasions, which placed their daughters and she in fear
Supreme Court Case: United States Vs. Lopez
1194 Words | 5 PagesUnited States v. Lopez was the first United States Supreme Court case since the New Deal to set limits to Congress's power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The issue of the case was that It exceeded to the power of Congress which had no say over it because the case had nothing to do with commerce or any sort of economic activity. The case United States v. Lopez involved Alfonzo Lopez Jr., Supreme Court Justice William H. Rehnquist, and Congress. Unites States v. Lopez was about a 12th grader named
Wolf V. Colorado Case Brief
584 Words | 3 PagesBefore 1948 Julius A. Wolf had been arrested and tried for reasons not stated in the Supreme Court case, but the evidence that was used against Wolf was taken unlawfully, the police had no warrant for his arrest as well as no warrant to search his office. Wolf was able to get an appeal to be tried one more time. In 1948 the trial Wolf v Colorado Supreme Court had begun. It was a very controversial topic because the case was based on the violation of the Fourth Amendment right of protection from search and seizures.
Case: State Of California Vs. Scott Lee Peterson
716 Words | 3 Pages"The State of California versus Scott Lee Peterson (Case number 1056770, 2005)", was an interesting case. This case was interesting because Laci was a very beautiful and seemingly young, friendly, and happily pregnant woman with lots of friends. Her husband, although attractive, had a kind of macho tough guy womanizer type of persona about himself. It is hard to believe or fathom someone being so cruel as to kill their pregnant wife, regardless of their marital problems. Laci came up missing on December 24, of 2002, the day before Christmas.
More about Arizona V. Case Briefs
The Case Of Brian James Ferry V. City Of Tucson
676 Words | 3 PagesHernandez V. Arizona Board Of Regents Case Brief
1228 Words | 5 PagesChimel Vs. California Case Study
455 Words | 2 PagesCivil Court Case: Horton V. California
247 Words | 1 PagesIncident Case Scenario: A Case Of Alysha Rosario
353 Words | 2 PagesLawrence Vs Texas 539 Case Study
340 Words | 2 PagesThompson Vs Arizona Case Summary
1003 Words | 5 PagesSupreme Court Case: The Case Of Mapp Vs. Ohio
354 Words | 2 PagesAguilar Vs Texas Case Analysis
731 Words | 3 PagesNewdow Supreme Court Case Summary
667 Words | 3 PagesLopez Case: The United States V. Lopez
285 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Gonzales Vs. Castle Rock
704 Words | 3 PagesSupreme Court Case: United States Vs. Lopez
1194 Words | 5 PagesWolf V. Colorado Case Brief
584 Words | 3 PagesCase: State Of California Vs. Scott Lee Peterson
716 Words | 3 Pages