Army Design Methodology Case Study

Acting within an environment in continuous changes, commanders and staff are often invited to deal with complex situations. Army Design Methodology (ADM) came to respond to this need, the need for a different tool that gives a new approach to unfamiliar and complex problems. Experience demonstrated that the classical approach through detailed planning showed real limits in dealing with complexity; ADM remains a very important asset that provides, through critical thinking, a holistic understanding and visualization. In this context, commanders and staff should ensure an effective transition between the conceptual planning associated with ADM and the detailed planning of MDMP.
An efficient transition to detailed planning consists of an appropriate use of ADM output. In this regard, the transition cannot be reduced to briefing the results of ADM and handing over the conceptual products to another planning. The best option is to have the same planning team that led the design effort leads the staff through the MDMP. If it is not

Instead of considering how truly representative the information is to the particular situation. In our case, the second group (I was a member) considered initially that Mullah Abdullah Hossein is an extremist religious leader like mullah Hashimi, then he is against our action and we should define him as an enemy. However, when we did more research, we found that during the major combat phase, Hossein dedicated himself to the resistance of the Ahurastani occupation of southern Azerbaijan. Tragically, his only son was killed by an AH artillery strike City. After that incident, his nationalistic message drew the admiration of pro-Azeri followers committed to the restoration of the Azerbaijani territories and regional autonomy. Our error in this case was because we unconsciously treat the Hashimi sample as a general