Art & Vision of R K Narayan
Chapter II
A.Phaniraja Kumar
R. K. Narayan is hallmark of Fiction and regarded him a ‘Father of Regional Novel’ along with Mulk Raj Anand, a committed writer and Raja Rao considered a metaphysical writer of Fiction. Mulk Raj Anand could be recognised as the Dickens of India for his zeal of reformation and concern for the poor, R.K.Narayan, his contemporary is Thackery another Victorian novelist for his creation of Middle Class characters and portrayal of average emotions. R.K.Narayan is also said to be the grand old man of Indian English fiction. He is a keen observer of men and matters. Unlike Mulk Raj Anand, he is a pure artist first and last. His novels are governed by his artistic intentions and not by his
…show more content…
The elements of humour and irony are his forte. His angle of vision determines the content and the atmosphere. His short stories have become very popular for their wit and wisdom. Narayan believes in ‘Art for art’s sake’. This secret of art ability can keep in perfect balance in all his writing. It makes him a subtle writer, concealing irony beneath a blandly simple exterior as a ‘plain’ story teller. To posit R K Narayan within the larger Indian Fictional novel, it is necessary to begin with her biography. Narayan is the 3rd of eight children to his parents and born on 10th October, 1906 in Madras in a wealthy upper-middle class Tamil Brahmin family in Rasipuram, Tamilnadu, India. His father is a school headmaster, worked in so many places in Karnataka State. His father has a taste in English and English Literature.
Narayan sees south India as a fundamentally conservative Hindu society, changing under the impact of the West, industrialism, modern ideas. Conservative India is seen with humour and some satire as a mixture of traditional holiness, with the comfort-loving sterility of the bourgeoisie. Modern India is seen an inevitable, but on the whole, inescapable phenomenon, compounded of external political activism, permissive sexual morals, the breakdown of the traditional extended family system, ‘American’ popular culture and rabid half-lunatic
…show more content…
His concern is not to expose the evils of the society but to artistically present realities of life in his novels. His novels are aesthetically engaging. In the view of K.R. Srinivasa Iyengar:
Narayan’s is the art of resolved limitation and conscientious exploration: he is content, like Jane Austen, with his ‘little bit of ivory’, just so many inches wide: he would like to be a detached observer, to concentrate on a narrow scene, to sense the atmosphere of the place, to snap a small group of characters in their oddities and angularities: he would, if he could, explore the inner countries of the mind, heart and soul, catch the uniqueness in the ordinary, the tragic in prosaic.1 Narayan beautifully created a local setting, Malgudi (somewhere in Karnataka), a South Indian town as his fictional town. This small town serves as the backdrop for the most of his novels. His creation of this fictional world Malgudi ranted a new chapter in the history of Indian English Fiction. K.R. Srinivasa Iyengar pointed out this town as ‘Narayan’s
He does this through a difficult to understand style of writing that has no clear thesis.
He writes realizing the subtle things he does and knows that the comforts of home that we use to take away our stress such as our family, our internet
Both of these works prove to contain a substantial absence of God in the characters’ ways of
“Different Authors write different ways, have different relationships with their audiences, and those are all legitimate”(John Green).Authors Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman who lived and expressed Themselves through Poetry and Writing during the realism era, convey different style characteristics, write in very different ways and connect to their audiences through very different ways. Both authors have very contrasting writing, although both differences and similarities are discovered by such characteristics. The writing of Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman shows many similarities and many differences through their backgrounds and themes, and the way both aspects affect their writing. Walt Whitman experienced a very different upbringing,
His Books always have a theme or a moral to the story just like when he wrote “The Lorax” and “The Butter Battle Book”. I believe the shared moral between these two books is that humans tend to forget that everyone has an opinion and when we become immersed in power and wealth we tend to dominate and desecrate the environment. The Lorax is a book about a man his name is Once-ler, at first he was filled with excitement for these Tuffula Trees’ because they were softer than silk and could make a garment called a Thneed. Once-ler cut down the first tree the Lorax came out from the stump and tried to tell him to stop.
His reasons for writing are shown in his Author’s Note which reads, “Beneath the gore and smoke and loam, this book is about the evanescence of life, and why some men choose to fill their brief allotment of time engaging the impossible, other in the manufacture of sorrow.(XI)” Another reason for this novel is to show conflicts in the world, “ In the end of the story of the ineluctable conflict between good and evil, daylight and darkness, the White and the
These artistic qualities make the reader more involved and makes them want to continue reading the
There has always been tension between the Indian and British people because of the the British People's colonial rule in India from 1858 to 1947. In By Any Other Name you will see many examples of the tension between the two ethnicities. The memoir about two Indian sisters, Premila and Santha, and their difficulties in British schools. In By Any Other Name, the author Santha Rama Rau uses diction, imagery, and tone to express a central message about personal culture and how you should stay true to your personal identity even if you are judged.
Article Analysis: The Importance of Writing Badly Bruce Ballenger’s article titled “The Importance of Writing Badly” takes a rather peculiar approach to addressing the issue of effective writing. The author eccentrically argues for the importance of ‘bad writing’ by describing different reasons to support his arguments. He argues that it is normal to apportion blames without understanding the root causes of poor writing skills. The author quotes different people who have expressed concerns about poor writing among students including his doctor. He proceeds by explaining why he would encourage his students not to concentrate on their poor writing experiences.
Also, in the book he helped people realize the significance of nature. From what society thought about nature, to nature being uncharted because people were afraid of it, and then how nature changed Equality 7-2521 as a character throughout the book. It showed how people can changed for better or for worse through different circumstances. I say this, because in society he was not that strong of a character and desired to be able to write or have his own thoughts without breaking rules. He changed and thrived as a character for the better when he went into nature and could think and say what he wanted and experiencing new
As I reading the excerpt, I was impressed by his wonderful writing skill and by how books influenced him like everybody who had read it. Two literary techniques that he used in the excerpt impressed the readers. He used
Alexie’s story mostly resonate irony for the Indian community and the modern society with stories that defy traditions. As my classmate, Ngan Phan, wrote
And lastly, they differ in style of writing and plot development. First, the two authors differ in character development. This element is essential since it provides the reader an implicit or explicit descriptions of all the characters.
The author connects the reader thanks to different literary and figurative devices as