Compare And Contrast Plato And Aristotle Art

1056 Words5 Pages
What is Aristotle 's vision on Plato 's perception of art and imitation ?

Aristotle agrees that art is imitation, but unlike Plato, he believes it’s a good thing that exists within humans naturally. According to Aristotle, humans learn by imitation. Both Plato and Aristotle have two very different perspectives regarding art. On one hand, Plato considers art as a low perceived human activity that doesn’t require any skills but rather an imitation of what is rather real. Also, Plato considers that art doesn’t consist of techne, which is a professional path that includes architecture, medicine, and etc. Plato was the first philosopher of his time to address the subject of art actively. Plato firmly stated how dangerous art is and how it advocates corruption among the youth. The latter believes that art is a copy of a copy making it twice removed from reality or the truth, yet art is indeed an imitation of reality.

Even though Aristotle has always been inspired by Plato, yet he has an opposite perception regarding art and how is it viewed as imitation. Aristotle firmly thinks that representing or depicting an object requires skills that are to be learned. It takes dexterity and effort to master a skill that in return impresses people. Plato believed that copying an image makes it lose its value
…show more content…
He in one sense limits the protest of imitation. Aristotle makes some comparable arguments in connection to nature. At that point, the thought of the "certain" is thought to be the protest of imitation. Aristotle segregates types in connection to their methods for impersonation, rather than the typical qualifications made by exposition, verse or meter. Hence the question of impersonation in catastrophe are men who are superior to us, and in drama men who are more

More about Compare And Contrast Plato And Aristotle Art

Open Document