5.4. Solution 4: Artificial Intelligence Based Assessment Systems
5.4.1. Effectiveness of existing solutions to grade students’ work massively
Automatic Grading System
Automatic grading system effectively eliminates the problems of insufficient human resources to grade students’ work. According to Abazorius (2017), the automatic grading software could accurately identify the mistakes made by students and make corresponding recommendations when it is used to grade students’ programming homework. It seems that the software work well with the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) courses. However, it may be challenging to apply the technology in social science, and humanities courses, where reflective essay is commonly used to assessed the students’ critical thinking on certain topics. Winerip (2012) suggests that automatic grading system could be easily manipulated and it fails to understand what is good writing. Automatic grading system efficiently eliminates the high student-teacher ratio problem, and works productively in STEM courses, further improvements are needed to enhance the quality when grading essay questions.
Peer Assessment
Peer assessment, employed by major MOOC platforms such as Coursera, edX and Udacity, is believed to effectively ease the problem of
…show more content…
Feedback from, both students and tutors, together with the data collected from the system will be used to analyze if AI assessment system could enhance students’ personalized learning experience. It is hoped that with more evidence that AI assessment system could accurately reflect students’ academic performance, people will be convinced AI assessment can replace the traditional exam in the MOOC platform and the penetration rate of the system will become 30-60% within 15-20
4. totalsubjects: that will store the total subjects of student. Calculation and formulas: 1.to calculate total score : total+=’E’-grade; 2.to calculate average: total/totalsubjects My program will run until s[0] is not equal to hyphen(-). And we are using the gets function to take information of student that take full line as input so by this we can any number of subjects.
Technology is changing the way people around the world can learn. In the article, “The Year Of The MOOC” , Laura Pappano discusses MOOCs which are massive open online courses. After reading each student’s essays James Gregory should take MOOCs. Gregory should take a MOOC because he is responsible, doesn’t like attention, and his very helpful. These online courses are designed for people like him.
In “How Grading Reform Changed Our School,” author Jeffery Erickson, the assistant principal of Minnetonka High School in Minnesota, discusses why and how he and his colleagues changed the way students received their grades. Erickson’s main argument in his essay is, “What should go into a grade?” His answer to this is that a student’s grade is solely reflected based on what a student knows and his or her ability to perform. Erickson opens up his essay by giving a scenario from a personal experience of when his daughter took swimming lessons. It was a challenge for his daughter to master the class, but in the end she finally passed on the last day.
The nature of cheating originates from the common misconception of helping others and a student’s lack of self-confidence. Plagiarism, not so different from cheating, disperses from the broad range of information on today’s technology. Through an authentic study, it has been revealed that teachers have established many students who have cheated their way through complexed assignments. Even misleading students who have kept a high grade point average has been found as participants of academic dishonesty. Today, professors seek to find different measures that should be taken to decrease cheating and plagiarism.
In “From Degrading to De-Grading,” Alfie Kohn criticizes current grading systems and their alleged harm to students. Kohn first lists three main problems with grading and then adds seven more. In summary, grading results in students showing little interest in learning, students choosing easier assignments, and less creative students (p. 254-255). The next seven points expose grading as unreliable, distracting, and tedious. Grading also incites cheating and ruins relationships between students and teachers (p. 255-257).
However, Alonso bases her argument on inferences she has drawn from her own personal experiences. For example, a professor will not always admit when they have failed to teach a topic, or acknowledge when they are grading with frustration behind their red pen. Alonso’s conclusions would carry more weight if she were to base them on research. Overall, Alonso has constructed a strong argument about the advantages to examinations that accounts for the different points of view teachers and students
1. What are some important steps in interpreting data from high stakes assessments? In order to make assessment data useful teachers must understand what information is being reported and determine if additional information is necessary to understand student performance. Specifically, for assessment results for students with disabilities, teachers would have to identify what accommodations were being used.
Summative Assessment: Prompts Respond to each prompt in a Google Doc. You will be handling this task in through turnitin.com. Remember to be specific, clear and detail oriented. Use the formative feedback as a guide to better your writing. Identify a theme in the story.
2:1 Compare the strengths and limitations of assessments of a range of assessment methods with reference to the needs of individual learners. Workplace Observations, question and answer/professional discussions, projects/assignments, portfolios, witness statements. A good assessor will always take into account their learners needs and what particular subject they are studying for prior to confirming with learner type of assessment method to be used. Workplace observations
Peer pressure between teenagers can have a positive or negative effect. In the text,” Back to Basics: Test Scores Don’t Lie,” the author Diane Ravich enforces the harmful side of peer pressure. Peer pressure is influenced by society, which is a major problem among teenagers. Sometimes to fit into a certain group, teenagers need to hide or lie about their achievement.
I incorporate this learned experience daily and learn through each success and discovered area of improvement. Addressing my students needs using a variety of assessment tools has been a beneficial practice to help guide instruction. Students have different learning styles and their strengths and weaknesses are not always apparent using the same methods of assessment. Utilizing formative, standards(goal)-based, anecdotal, observational and benchmarks has driven my instructional programs. The combination of different assessments provides me with a multi-dynamic perspective of my students allowing me to better understand their strengths, weakness and academic needs.
In today’s society, a large amount of emphasis is placed on getting good grades. Day in and day out students are told that getting good grades is detrimental to their future. Unfortunately what many students are not told is that their intelligence is not defined by the marks they receive, but rather intelligence is defined by so much more than a letter on a report card. Albert Einstein once said, “Everyone is a genius, but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing it is stupid.
In methods developed by Slavin (1994, 1995), students can earn certificates or other recognition if their average team scores on quizzes or other individual assignments exceed a pre-established criterion (Kagan, 1992). Methods developed by Johnson and Johnson (1994) and their colleagues at the University of Minnesota often give students grades based on group performance, which is defined in several different ways. The
Allowing students to evaluate their teachers, will give teachers an incentive to improve on their teaching skills. If teachers know that they are going to be evaluated by their students, they will begin to work twice as hard due to the incentives given to them. For example, a teacher who is lazy and enthusiastic about their job will come to the realization that if they don’t step up their game, they can be terminated and replaced. Essentially, this will lead to students receiving a higher quality of education. As a result,
It is generally accepted that testing encourages and gauges students’ learning, although most students would agree that education would be a little bit more enjoyable if they took fewer tests, given that the tests contain a lot of marks at stake (Dunlosky et al., 2013). Hence, the idea of self-testing as a form of practice testing is a reasonable idea. When students do self-testing, they test their memory, what they have learned, what have they revised; anything they can recall from memory. Through this, they can gauge their own performance and where they stand in terms of comprehension and understanding, much like how teachers do when testing students. Hartwig and Dunlosky (2012) believe that “self-testing by recalling the target information boosts performance on subsequent recall and multiple-choice tests of the target information, and it also boosts performance on tests of comprehension” (p. 131).