Solomon E Asch was a Polish gestalt psychologist and an important part of social psychology. Asch’s contribution to the studies of conformity was immense and he was considered a pioneer to social psychology.In the early 50’s Asch performed some psychological experiments which tested how social pressure would be able to affect an individual’s will to conform and individual levels of conformity where many people were found out to have shown signs of conforming (Crane, 2012). Through Asch’s advancements, we have come to know the Asch Paradigm which lays the foundation of conformity. According to Asch and his many studies, conformity is rewarded to a great extent with many social benefits. When an individual chooses to conform, they do so in …show more content…
In that study, a participant that had eventually conformed stated that he was wrong and that the rest of the people were right which can be seen as the individual doubting himself. Based on that statement from the participant, another reward is that conforming can protect oneself from doubting themselves and can lead to confidence. In figure 3.3 of Opinions and Social Pressures, there are a series of photos associated with the experiment being performed. In the figure, the outlier of the group is described as distraught and under stress; “he shows the strain of repeatedly disagreeing”. In this instance, conforming can lead to prevention of straining one’s self and the prevention of being under stress and being distraught. As in most of Asch’s experiments regarding conformity, the participant that is subject to conform is almost always quiet and shy with their differing opinions/views, but those in the ingroup are open and free with theirs. Based on that, conformity is also rewarding by allowing the person that has conformed to be free and open with their opinion rather than holding it back in fear of being isolated and/or loathed. “What you don’t know, won’t hurt you” is a well known saying that can be applied to conformity’s rewards in Asch’s experiments. By conforming, an individual may be spacing themselves from a truth which they may not …show more content…
(Effects of Group Pressure, 1951) Asch had written about two subjects in an experiment of his in which one of them had maintained who he was with stress whilst the other yielded to conforming. While the former man reacted calmly throughout the experiment, the latter man was experiencing loss in confidence in himself after conforming. This finding shows that conformity can be discouraged since excessive social pressure can possibly lead to the individual under pressure to experience loss in self confidence. Asch has also stated that conformity is discouraged by the presence of a supporting partner since the presence of a supporting partner immensely brought down the social pressure. Based on that, we can safely say that conformity is only encouraged when not done in a place where a supporting partner is available where it is otherwise
In today’s society the general attitude towards an individual is conform or be an outcast. It is seen in schools where people who do not fit into specific cliques become outcasts, the weird people. It is seen in the work place as well. People have conformed to standards set by society simply because society has said to do so. Society asks people to change themselves to fit in.
The other type on conformity is called informational influence. People assume the actions of others in an attempt to reflect correct behavior for a given situation. This may work wonderful in a beehive where there are thousands of other bees with the same mindset. The Problem with this in today 's society can be explained with the simple Solomon Asch
Conformity n: action in accord with prevailing social standards, attitudes, practice etc. Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery Disillusionment of Ten O’clock by Wallace Steven both tell a story of conformity being amiss. Recruiting in Jackson's The Lottery for me to believe stoning a villager to death is okay because they call it tradition. Steven’s society adapted into having no imagination. I tried to keep this from being a conformist I agree with Steven and Jackson’s point of conformity being wrong.
Conformity and group mentality are major aspects of social influence that have governed some of the most notorious events and experiments in history. The Holocaust is a shocking example of group mentality, or groupthink, which states that all members of the group must support the group’s decisions strongly, and all evidence leading to the contrary must be ignored. Social norms are an example of conformity on a smaller scale, such as tipping your waiter or waitress, saying please and thank you, and getting a job and becoming a productive member of society. Our society hinges on an individual’s inherent need to belong and focuses on manipulating that need in order to create compliant members of society by using the ‘majority rules’ concept. This
How did Orlando 's mock psychiatric study support Zimbardos findings. Conformity: Yielding to group pressure The influence a group has over an individual Reffered to a majority influence Compliance is a form of social influence Following the majority even if views arnt shared to fit in Conformity is a unambiguous task Informational social influence Identification in conformity Comformity to assigned roles Individuals alternate their general behaviour and opinions both privately and publicly. Being a member of a group is highly desirable.
Moreover, the obedience engrained within us as well as our tendency to strive for social order, also allows us to provide a certain justification for our actions. Under authoritative instruction and influence from those around them,
One of the most significant advantages of conformity is that it can promote social unity within a group or community. When individuals conform to social norms and shared values, they are more likely to feel a sense of belonging to others in their group. This, in turn, can lead to greater cooperation and collaboration, which can be crucial for achieving common goals and addressing shared challenges. For example, in a workplace setting, conformity to a set of shared values and norms can help to build a sense of team spirit and foster a positive work culture. Similarly, conformity to a set of social norms can promote a sense of unity and shared identity among members of a particular culture or society.
Conformity is something that humans have been doing for a long time. Such conformity has lead to negative outcomes. This idea is explored through “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut and “The Unknown Citizen” by W.H. Auden. In these two texts conformity eliminates individuality and causes the society to be weakened.
In the 1950’s, Solomon Asch, pioneer of Gestalt Psychology and Social Psychology, became famous due to his series of experiments known as Asch conformity experiments. These experiments showed the effects of social pressure on conformity. One of his classic social experiments demonstrated how people are affected by the thoughts and behaviors of other people. In this experiment, Asch gathered seven to nine male college students, all were confederates but one.
Jenness (1932) found that when experiment participants carried out the task in a group, they reported estimates of roughly same value even though they had previously quoted different estimates as individuals. Jenness’ study revealed the impact of majority influence, and established a direct correlation between a group influence on an individual’s behaviour and beliefs especially when participants are uncertain about the actual number of beans in the jar. Another classical study on conformity was based on finding out how social norms are developed in social groups and how the influences of these norms when developed impact on an individual’s behaviour. The Autokinetic phenomenon study of Sherif (1937) according to Baron et al. (2008, p.277), illustrated vividly the impact of private acceptance of social influence.
It has often been considered what impact social power and status have on an individuals’ level of obedience. Obedience can be defined as a compliance to commands given by a person in order to avoid punishment. Such a response occurs in situations where individuals adjust their behaviour in recognition of social influence from others. Throughout the 1950’s, social psychologist Stanley Milgram became interested in Solomon Asch’s studies of conformity and the capacity of an individual to be influenced by group pressure.
Mendacity is the act of lying and being untruthful. Everyone lies some point in their lives either to avoid a certain punishment or for a certain reward. People might also lie about being troubled in order to avoid talking about their issues with other people or because they are worried about their friends and family finding out about their issues. Mendacity is a topic that is explored in the play Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. Most of the characters, in one way or another, are living a lie.
It results in people conforming to decisions they would not normally make. These people generally set aside their own beliefs and conform to the rest of the group. Real life examples of this could be the fact that many people, especially in school, follow the opinions and actions of those who are considered to be “popular”. In conclusion, Asch’s experiments prove that people are extremely determined to fit in instead of stand out, at least when it comes to social situations.
The results more than concerned Asch, who conducted a second, revised experiment to further analyze this. Allowing the subject to write down their answer after hearing the answers from the confederates lowered the conformity rate by one third (“Solomon Asch experiment”), which was a bit comforting, but not by much. Regardless, concern was still present. “Why?” Asch wondered.