Life on the Global Assembly Line by Babara Ehrenreich and Annette Fuentes addresses globalization, multinational corporations, international division of labor, gender concerning jobs, poor working conditions in factories, and U.S. government involvement in exploitative conditions for Third World women workers. Most exported industries are towards Third World countries. These exported industries are unsafe and in poor conditions. Production of products are broken down where fragments are sent to different parts of the world to be completed. In the Third World countries, females are responsible for working in factories and having to deal with poor working conditions and low income. As it states in the essay, “This is the world’s new industrial …show more content…
For example it states, “In the U.S. an assembly line worker is likely to earn, depending on her length of employment, between $3.10 and $5.00 an hour. In many Third World countries, a woman doing the same work will earn $3.00 to $5.00 a day.” In Third World countries they are not paid enough because they’re looked upon as cheap labor. Also, because one may be foreign they are taken advantage of because they’re not American and doesn’t know any better. The one who is in charge of these industries can treat women workers how they want because either way, their complaints doesn’t matter to anyone. Today in the U.S., if you’re just arriving from your home country to America, you will be treated differently as a customer or a worker. Customers are charged extra and workers are told to work overtime with no pay. Workers like this are pushed around but desperately need the …show more content…
Why should women be treated differently, be taken advantage of, and have to deal with harsh conditions just because they won’t threaten or sabotage equipment like how men do? Females especially in Third World countries should be taken care of and treated generously because their making products for other corporations and like today, are helping businesses rise. What gives multinational cooperations the right to treat women workers so poorly? For example it states, “The work that multinational cooperations export to the Third World is not only the most tedious, but often the most hazardous part of the production process. The countries they go for, for the most part, those that will guarantee no interference from health and safety inspectors, trade unions, or even freelance reformers.” Women are working in conditions that are deadly. They can only go to such an extent where they can afford to make a living. A woman shouldn’t be attacked, killed, punished, or fired for filing a complaint when they are working in dangerous conditions risking their health. Instead this problem should be addressed and they should be paid fully due to their hours instead of below minimum wage. Females fought for betteor working conditions and minimum wage for a reason. Today it has improved and discrimination against women has
When Japan and India began to mechanize their cotton industries between the 1880s and 1930s, several similarities and differences surfaced. Both Japan and India’s cotton yarn productions began to increase rapidly, workers in both countries faced similar poor working conditions, and the transaction of workers going from rural to urban areas were protruding. However, both countries contained a difference in the type of workers in the cotton industry workforce as well as the displacement of skilled Indian workers as opposed to Japanese workers. (Thesis) In the mechanization of the cotton industry, Japan and India similarly shared their ways of production in which they both had rapid growth with machine-made cotton between the 1880s and the 1930s
These young women,many being immigrants, worked six or seven days a week for wages of approximately $5, crammed into dark spaces with little ventilation . This factory like so many others was owned and run by men who were more interested in males working in the higher-paid jobs, while assuming women were less skilled and less willing to fight for equality. “The shops are unsanitary - that's the word that is generally used, but there ought to be a worse one used. Whenever we tear or damage any of the goods we sew on, or whenever it is found damaged after we are through with it, whether we have done it or not, we are charged for the piece and sometimes for a whole yard of the material. ”(7).
The dangers of working in factories gave a great perspective of what it was like to do a man’s job, but women weren’t afraid. They desired equality and
These women have done so much for women by inspiring them to that their efforts to get women’s rights have for the most part succeeded. Today, all women in America have equals rights. But there still remains a couple problems. One issue that has popped up over the last few years was equal pay.
The women in this excerpt even encouraged other girls to join the workplace. Factories also helped meet consumer demands. They were able to get unskilled laborers to do the job, which increased mass production. In Document 4, the graph that is shown
Finn has observed over time that the typical mindset of a consumer in Canada is to prioritize finding the best value over all other factors when purchasing goods. More times than not, the best value item is one that was created in a sweatshop in a Third World country. These goods cost less than those that were manufactured in through fair trade because of what Finn calls, “A vast global strategy designed ultimately to force wages down in Canada and other Western nations” (30). This statement reveals that Western businesses are always looking to maximize their profits, and if they don’t have to pay workers as much if they’re from a third world country, that will help them sell more items at a slightly lower price. Finn mentions that in the third world countries, businesses can get away with paying less wages and not having to worry about the requirements for working conditions and labor laws.
The Industrial Revolution was a period in time where the invention of machines came to life in the 1700s in England. After spreading to many parts like Europe and the United States, the idea of using machines to work was later introduced in Japan. The use of the machines in Japan made it easier and more convenient for the workers to use. It also sped up the work progress and provided more production, but there were some disadvantages. Therefore, the costs did outweigh the benefits of having machines in Japan.
The Industrial Revolution was a point in the mid 1700’s where machine made goods were greatly increased in England. Women working in factories worked in outrageous working conditions, some even fatal. They had short breaks worked long hours and got little pay. The women that worked in the silk factories in Japan had all these cost, but they were just kind of worst. They not only had all this, but they also had unfair treatment.
The work was also dangerous with not much supervising by the government. Workers, on the other hand, had little or even no bargaining power to leave the unsafe conditions. Nowadays, When Americans only pay attention when extreme work strike, levels of abuse are the norm hidden in the factories around the globe. Although the condition seems much improved, consumers don’t know the true fact- “Today, American citizens simply cannot know the working conditions of the factories that make the products they buy.
The Industrial Revolution resulted in many huge changes in society, including a growth in capitalism. The social and political effects have produced a great amount of debate. Andrew Ure, Karl Marx, and Adam Smith all had differing views on industrial capitalism and opinions about what its social consequences would be. Ure’s “The Philosophy of Manufactures,” Marx’s “The Communist Manifesto,” and Smith’s “Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” all portray their perspectives.
The passing of this law saw all employees get treated equally, and the biases that existed ended. Its legislation led to the reduction in the rate of unemployment in organizations. Discrimination based on sex preferences has been the major challenge and this drove the women rights movement to stress for the legislation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Aiken, Salmon, & Hanges, 2013.) Despite Title VII of the Civil Rights Act helping to alleviate the issue of discrimination especially on women in employment sectors, it did not meet all the needs of women in the
“Why Tipping Is Wrong,” an article found in the New York Times discusses the issue of lower minimum wage for tipped workers. Writer, Saru Jayaraman, the director of the Food Labor Research Institute at Berkeley, argues for the reformation of the law that allows a lower minimum wage for tipped workers. She presents her argument by targeting those who go to restaurants, lawmakers, the waiters/waitresses, and even the restaurant itself. By targeting this specific audience, she is able to speak to those who interact with those working in the industry and those who will be able to make a change in order to fix it. Rhetorical devices are vital in order for arguments to be successful.
Paragraph 1: Industrialization really took of in the United States during the late 1800s and the early 1900s. Before then, America 's population had mostly lived out in the farms and ranches of the country, but that was about to change when more and more people started to move to the cities for work. Most of the people that moved, found themselves in factory jobs for the steel industry or alike, or working for the railroads. Companies could really thrive, as the United States government, adopted a policy of Laissez Faire. This is also about the time that immigration really kicked up, more and more immigrants were showing at Ellis Island, looking for a new start.
It also examines whether the gender exploitation/ inequality
Aubrey Rose A, Barangot English 27B Title Gender Equality: An Established Human Right Thesis Gender Equality and Stereotypes Inroduction The gender equality has been accepted and acknowledged as human rights’ principles since the adoption of charter of United Nations in 1945. Most of the international agreements such as ‘the Millennium Development Goals (2000)’ and ‘the World Conference on Human Rights (1993) have highlighted and stressed the grave need for nations to take appropriate actions against such discriminatory practices. To give clarity to this research, the researcher uses the following definitions: “Everyone has a fundamental right to live free of violence.