ipl-logo

Assess The Significance Of Norcross's Analogy

553 Words3 Pages

In the beginning of Norcross, Alastair introduces an analogy. The analogy consists of two premises and a conclusion. The first of the premises looks into the story of Fred. Fred was in an auto accident and he damaged his Godiva gland. Therefore, he decided to torture puppies in order to produce cocoamone. Cocoamone is the hormone that lets people enjoy the taste of chocolate. In the second premise, Norcross discusses about the situation of the animals raised in farms. How could they be different from the torture of puppies by Fred? He looks further into the situation by giving similarities between the two premises. Norcross examines the stress filled lives of the animals in farms. He suggests that these animals are confined, cramped, and …show more content…

He explains of the stress filled lives these animals endure for the pleasure of humans. The humans are not properly aware of the situations of these animals. They are consistently in cramped cages in farms, while human’s sense of morality towards farm animals has been nonexistent. Norcross’s conclusion does not argue against eating meat, but he justifies it to an extent. Norcross compares two distinctive creatures in his argument, and their comparison does not justify his point of view. Puppies are animals that are raised and loved by many people across the world. Of course, any dog owner would be sympathetic to the torturing of these puppies for gustatory pleasure. Farm animals are raised for the sole purpose of profit and value. Norcross’s argument does not have any validity, and therefore, does not contain enough evidence to support it. While on the other hand, Machan argues against animals having any rights. He believes inanimate objects are less important than animate objects. In his example, he compares rocks and dolphins, as well as plants and dogs. He argues to an extent that animal rights activists believe that animate objects have more rights than inanimate

Show More
Related

  • Chapter Summary Of Every 12 Seconds By Ishmael Pachirtat

    1158 Words  | 5 Pages

    Pachirtat writes, “This book provides a firsthand account of contemporary, industrialized slaughter and does so to provoke reflection on how distance and concealment operate as mechanisms of power in modern society.” (3) Pachirtat’s main argument of this book is not to bring light to the thirty-three million cows that are killed every year in the United States, but to make an argument on how distance and concealment of the slaughterhouse are hidden by power. Pachirtat explains that there are laws put into place that prevent any outsiders to enter the slaughterhouse and to keep what is going on inside hidden from society. Throughout the book Pachirtat’s style of writing can make the biggest meat lover think twice before biting into their next hamburger, the main argument is not the cow. He states that “this book does not engage directly with arguments for animals rights, it is my deepest hope that its detailed account of industrialized killing will invite readers to seek a more thoughtful relationship with the nonhuman creatures.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Against Meat By Jonathan Safran Foer

    1009 Words  | 5 Pages

    Summary In this article “Against Meat” Jonathan Safran Foer describes his personal experience with struggling whether he eats meat or not and what he went through to become a vegetarian, his main reason was he didn’t want animals to suffer. Foer had a lot of influence in his life, starting with his grandmother who he considered her as a role model he loved her passion with food, although she had one recipe

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    This short story explains and questions how people find eating animals morally acceptable. Steiner 's short story explains that whenever people think these animals are being treated respectfully they are being ignorant to the fact of how these animals are truly treated; Steiner brings up the fact of how an animals typical horrid life is and how it transitions from its horrid life to being killed by a butcher in a matter of seconds. Moreover, Steiner also adheres to the topic of how unacceptable, it is to kill these animals just for human consumption. Steiner 's purpose in writing this short story is to display to us the fact that eating any animal is not only wrong, but it is just downright unacceptable as it is mass murder of these innocent animals. Finally, Steiner tries to define at his best, what a strict vegan truly

    Read More

  • Summary Of A Change Of Heart About Animals By Jeremy Rifkin

    713 Words  | 3 Pages

    Because it has been proven that animals do, just like humans, it can be argued that their suffering is enough evidence to justify their right to live without explanation, but considering that her argument is more extreme that Rifkin’s, it might be helpful if it had more support. In addition, she goes as far to insist that, “meat eating and animal abuse leads to spiritual disturbance and physical disease”. Without giving any evidence to prove its legitimacy, not only does she leave out any way to prove her assertions, her “spiritual disturbance” claim is vague and the reader confused as to what she means. Despite this, the majority of Frazier’s letter is well supported by the

    Read More

  • Factory Farm Why Should We Condemn Fred

    154 Words  | 1 Pages

    The passage is saying that we should treat the animals that we normally eat just like we treat puppies, which are normally treated like family. Morality comes into play and presents that if we don’t torture puppies for our eating pleasures then we should not support factory farms since they torture animals, which end up being eaten for our pleasure. The author is unable to find a morally relevant difference between Fred and people who eat factory raised meat, at least ones that consume the meat that know what the animals have endured to end up on their plates. The passage relates greatly to the view of the author. The author explained that if we condemn Fred’s behavior, which was only to heighten his gustatory experience then shouldn’t we condemn

    Read More

  • Norcross's Argument Analysis

    538 Words  | 3 Pages

    The treatment of animals should defiantly be considered when one is raising them for meat or using them for science experiments. One objection can be made about Norcross’s argument, he compares puppies to live stock and factory raised meat to torturing puppies in someone’s basement. I feel that this argument was a good attention grabber but to compare puppies to live stock in my opinion is not a good comparison. Why? In our culture puppies and dogs are part of the family and live stock is a food source.

    Read More

  • What Is Animal Cruelty In Elizabeth Costello's Essay

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although the thought of treating animals humanely is an agreeable argument to side by, Costello’s approach to the subject was incorrect. In my opinion, she fails to use fitting analogies to explain why factory

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Alastair Norcross

    742 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alastair Norcross takes the position in the animal rights argument that torturing animals for their use is unacceptable. He asks to consider a case where a man, Fred, lost his ability to enjoy chocolate because he lost the ability to produce Cocoamone. Fred’s doctor tells him that a recent study shows that, when puppies are tortured and then brutally killed, they produce cocoamone that Fred can then harvest. So Fred sets up his basement where he can torture puppies and then slaughter them in order to taste chocolate again. Norcross claims that this is obviously wrong and draws a correlation between Fred’s case and the situation where we cause chickens to suffer in order to mass produce their meat.

    Read More

  • Puppy Mills

    673 Words  | 3 Pages

    Little do they know the unsanitary and harmful environments puppy mill bred dogs have to live in for the first period of their lives. The number of puppy mills there is in the United States have increased hugely since their early years, which were after World War II. During their early years, puppy mills only originated to generate income for the struggling farmers. However, just because the puppy mill’s were on a much smaller scale does not mean they were not as cruel as today’s. The first puppy mills were built on a capitalistic mindset.

    Read More

  • Why Are Puppy Mills Banned

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    Puppies are often cramped in small cages and stacked on top of each other. -https://www.emaze.com/@ALWFZLRI/Presentation%20Name They sleep in their own filth. Feces and urine falls onto the other dogs, and they are exposed to extreme heat and cold. - https://www.emaze.com/@ALWFZLRI/Presentation%20Name This is why I think that puppy mills should be banned from the united states of

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Puppy Mill

    1278 Words  | 6 Pages

    When you look in the window at a cute little puppy at a pet store have you ever thought about what that puppy’s life might have been like before they got to that store? Frankly speaking, I never did until I started reading about puppy mills. Puppy farms or puppy mills are institutions of cruelty usually hidden from public view where dogs are housed in shocking appalling conditions. It is not unusual for large number of dogs to be crammed together in filthy pens and cages. As a pet owner, animal lover, or as a concerned adult, it is time for us to save this helpless dogs and puppy as puppy mills are extremely inhumane and need to be stopped.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Factory Farming By Matthew Scully

    1104 Words  | 5 Pages

    This essay targets conservatives whose job is to preserve and uphold the value of society. Scully is encouraging conservatives to get up and do something about how unfair animals

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Peter Singer's 'Down On The Factory Farm'

    422 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis “Down on the factory farm” The last thing that comes to our mind when we order a piece of steak at a restaurant is how that animal we are about to eat was being treated while they were alive. According to author Peter Singer’s article "Down on the factory farm” he questions what happened to your dinner when it was still an animal? He argues about the use and abuse of animals raised for our consumption. In Singer’s article he states personal facts and convincing statistics to raise a legitimate argument.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Eating Meat

    1421 Words  | 6 Pages

    The meat packing industry disregards animal’s emotions and their rights all together by the malicious treatment of animals. The way animals are being treated is highly unfair. Being slaughtered for their body parts and suffering just to be used for protein or an asset to humans is unbearable. An animal’s life is at equal values to a human and deserve the same rights as

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

    Read More

More about Assess The Significance Of Norcross's Analogy

Open Document