11. Aside from the legal considerations discussed above, what other problems do you see with the way this interview was conducted?
An interview is intended to be informal and held in a non-hostile manner. Having the interview take place in the office of the interviewee is a positive way of setting this tone. However, the type of questioning that ensues must be in-line with this tone and at no point should the interviewee be tipped off that they might be considered a suspect. The line of questioning appears to not have been neutral and a bias of guilt may have existed from the interviewers. There is concern for the intent of the interview as it appears as though a couple of the interviewers went in with the purpose of obtaining a confession,
…show more content…
Do you think the excuse clause in this signed statement is appropriate? Why or why not?
An excuse clause doesn’t diminish legal responsibility but does help the confessor feel as though compassion and sympathy are being expressed. The provided excuse clause is valid as it provides the intent for the crime. However, the excuse clause needs to be indicative of the rationalization provided by the confessor and not embellished.
16. List nine key pieces of information that must be included in the signed statement.
Included in the signed statement should be the intent/motive for the fraudulent activity, the approximate time period (beginning and end dates), the approximate amount of funds involved, the number of times instances, other individuals involved, the excuse clause, acknowledgement of the truthfulness of written statement, acknowledgment of confessor having read the statement. With the provided information of this case, the following information should be listed in the signed statement:
Intent: Financial pressure and need to pay off substantial gambling debt
Approximate activity commence: beginning on xxx
Approximate activity termination: ending on xxx
Approximate Amount of Funds Involved: ($9,999 x 15mo. = $150,000
Despite of sending email reminders, WhatsApp messages, Phone calls, Coachings, Counselling from your team leader, if you are still not adhering to your AUX 1 time frame then we would consider it as a behavioral problem. Let me reiterate this again, your shift consists of 2, 15 minutes AUX 1 before and after your lunch break and you all have to manage your time and adhere to the 15 minutes timeframe. There can be days where you exceed your break due to sickness or any other excuse, but these excuses can only be valid once in a while, not everyday! Unless you are not medically fit, you are required to present a medical report from your panel doctor for HR review. Please consider this as a final warning, there will not be any other entertaining
Opinions in the case draws on a plurality opinion in which a two-stage test looks at whether the questions without first given Miranda was intentional or unintentional. Patrice Seibert discovered her son Jonathan
Good Evening Ms. Seed, I am working on the 2.03 assignment. I am having some difficulties and was wondering if you would be able to help me. I choose the Federalist side and only have my introduction completed. I am having some difficulties explaining the two sides. If yuo could please help me so that I could move on with the rest of the needed compleed assignements.
PRACTICE TEST 4 Name____________________________ Date__________ Per. ________ Read the poem carefully before you begin to answer the questions. I had not minded walls We're universe one rock And far I heard his silver call
The clip watched showed Brendan Dassey being interviewed by the police as a suspected accomplice to his uncle Steven Avery’s crime of the rape and murder of Teresa Halbach. This clip shows the police interrogating the teenager Brendan Dassey without any parent or lawyer present. This tape and his ensuing confession were the ultimate cause of his imprisonment where he was convicted of being an accomplice to murder and disposal of a body. Brendan Dassey’s conviction was ultimately overturned as the confession, which was the prosecutions’ leading evidence, was thrown out after it proved to be coerced. While the confession was coerced it is important to acknowledge that the officers were not entirely improper with how they conducted the interview.
An under other than honorable conditions discharge is appropriate with the request and admission of guilt. The applicant contends his discharge was not handled fairly. The service record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge on 20 April 2009.
2. You are a new principal and are setting up interviews for a vacant position at your school. You will have an interview team comprised of 3 teachers, a parent and a board/ LSC member. You want to be sure they understand what questions can be asked of prospective employees and what is prohibited from being asked. You are working on the guidelines you will go through with the team regarding appropriate and inappropriate questions.
prosecution, which led them to believe that there were many issues within the system that led to the wrongful conviction that needed to be fixed so another minority was not charged with a murder that was not committed by them. The Inquiry found that the investigation was not done suitably for the standards that the police, and the Crown have. The case’s evidence was insufficient due to lack of investigation at the crime scene, of the witnesses, and of the charges pursued. There was also an insufficient amount of sensitivity of this case due to the fact that it was the prosecution of a visible minority and the lack of training done on the respect to sensitivity on visible minorities. As well as the absence of sufficient review led to the wrongful conviction because they didn’t review the first eyewitness reports and relied only on the second report, which were influenced by an incompetent and unprofessional
I interviewed James Small in front of 4018 Brookshire Ct. I advised Mr. Small of his rights and advised him my investigation was an administrative investigation, adding that he was not required to speak to me. Mr. Small agreed to speak with me. Mr. Small stated he came to his dad’s residence to see him. Mr. Small stated that his dad’s ex-girlfriend or roommate had moved some of her items out the day before and was to move the rest out today. Mr. Small stated that when he arrived Emily was there with a group of people.
Candidate Heller briefed a five paragraph order that contained the majority of information his subordinates required to understand their mission; however, how it was to be accomplished was slightly ambiguous, leading to the impression that he was uncertain how to accomplish the mission. Despite this, SNC was able to quickly transition his subordinates into the execution of the problem upon conclusion of his brief. SNC quickly implemented a plan that established his team on a trajectory towards success. Throughout the execution of the problem, SNC never stalled, nor was there a moment of uncertainty among his subordinates. SNC continuously developed his plan to match the given situation, providing his subordinates with clear guidance of what
An example of this would be when Rossbach complained to the reporters outside that Dr. Sheppard would not answer their questions, and refused to take a polygraph test (Neff, 2002, p. 39). The public was willing to assume
(para43) following the consequences, the late payments to the defendant would not cause ‘significant harm’ (para55) and the only likely loss to the defendant was “the loss of the use of money in the meantime.” (para69) coupled with all other circumstances of the case, led the court of appeal to conclude that Mr. Valilas’ breach of contract had not deprived Mr. Januzaj of “substantially the whole of benefit” of the contract. The Valilas case therefore emphasizes again the significant risks associated with terminating contracts on the basis of a repudiatory breach of contract. (para58) Ratio Decidendi: It should be well understood at this point what renunciation and repudiation means.
You Will Be The Judge Facts: The case involves a 12 year old child named Griffin Grimbly who told the teacher that he was beaten with a clothesline by his father Mr.Gimli. In court, the Mr.Gimli argued that he was devoted to Christian and was following the Biblical injunction on child rearing, “Spare the rod and spoil the child”, as well as arguing that s 43 of the criminal code gives parents the right to use “reasonable force” in disciplining their children. Issue: Is Mr. Grimbly is guilty of or not guilty of assault ? Held: Mr.Grimbly is guilty of assault.
Introduction This question requires an examination of the law of contract and the nature of the subject matter that was contracted between the parties. Only Antonia and Jonathan are legally bound by and entitled to enforce the contract (Coulls v Bagot’s ) and may sue or be sued under the contract. The rights and obligations of Antonia and Jonathan depend on whether the contract has been validly terminated. If the contract validly terminated, all future obligation will be terminated, but obligations arising prior to termination remains intact.
The term “apology comes from the Greek word apologia which means to defend. In this essay I would like to explain why I believe that The Apology by Plato should be classified as pity and fear, in regards to Greek tragedy. I believe that this is true because I can personally empathize with Socrates; this will be discussed later on in this essay. A tragic hero is considered to be an individual with an intellectual flaw or error, Socrates fits this description; Socrates failed to understand that he could not empathize with the jurors because they simply wanted him to acknowledge his prior offenses, while he only sought out telling the truth and not sullying his own moral code. Socrates should be considered a tragic hero because he had an intellectual error, not an ethical one.