In the field of nursing practice nurses frequently experience situations which encourage them to think about ethical and legal aspects to make decisions. In this case study author will examine different ethical principles and legal possibilities which could be applied to make decision. In this case, a nurse is suffering from debilitating motor neuron disease. She realise that disease is progressive and in short time she will be in last stage of disease. She is worried about emotional and financial effects of disease on her family. Motor neuron disease is rare disease in which patients suffer from degeneration of motor neuron. That leads to debility of muscles, speech problems, muscle jerks and difficulty in breathing and many …show more content…
She is well oriented and well aware about her condition and as per her knowledge she believes her motor neuron disease will affect her family financially and emotionally. few evidences also support her belief in Australia, for example, it is estimated that 14 persons from patient’s close contact will live with impact of motor neuron disease forever ("MND Australia - What is MND?," 2015). Thus, as per autonomy and patients view it may be ethical to support her decision of assisted suicide but Beneficence and Non-maleficence are other important ethics which should also be considered. As no ethical principle overweight the other, the application of ethical principle is based on individual case. As greater good and do not harm ethics suggest that nurse should be prevented from making assisted suicide. It is a fact that, patients suffer many unbearable problems due to motor neuron disease but reasonable palliative and supportive treatment is available to help the patients of motor neuron diseases. Many new research studies suggest that in UK about 98% of people died quietly who were suffering from motor neuron disease and 50% of those died at home ("motor neuron disease," 2011). Thus, as per nurse perspective, it is necessary to inform a patient about possibilities of positive outcome available as a palliative and supportive
Death is a natural process that will be experienced by everyone at some point, desirably at the end of a long, well lived life. The reality is that no one knows when that time will come or how it will happen. Unfortunately, for the terminally ill, death is in the near future and it is a sobering reality. Therefore, when that time comes, people need to know that they will have options, and the assurance that death does not have to be an agonizing end. They can choose to endure the annihilating pain that comes with the disease and allow it to take its natural course or choose to put an end to it, surrounded by those who love them.
In this case study I would speak to Frank as a pastor and a friend because we have a relationship that has developed over time when we have spent Saturdays together. Whether he is an active member or only attends church on Sundays I would still council him with the same respect that I would as someone who is very active in the church. I would be accountable to correct Frank because he is wrong. Frank knows he is wrong, but still needs to hear it. It would be my main focus for Frank to understand what he is putting at risk in destroying his marriage and also Trixxi’s.
he child's maternal grandmother stated Anna has a history of domestic violence, drug use, and suicidal ideation. The reporter stated Anna has been diagnosed as bipolar and is currently on suicide watch by local law enforcement. Tamara stated Anna was recently released from jail and had plans to spend time with the victim and the reporter while she gets back on track and pick up her medications. Anna left the home on 10/20/15 and has not returned and the reporter has received text messages from Anna stating plans to take her life and heard from others that at this time Anna may be suicidal and plans to come pick up Addyson. Tamara stated she's had custody of Addyson all her life and contacted her lawyer; Ms. Wright's lawyer told her there was
Marmar Tavasol Word Count: 815 The Right to End Suffering Mrs. Brown, a patient with ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) should have the option to end her life prematurely or to stay alive and suffer tremendously from a disease that is bound to kill her. Based on the readings and lecture in class, it has become apparent to me that choosing to die by withdrawing medication and choosing to die by taking medication follow very similar reasoning. On the paper Story of Teresa & Terrence - The Established Medical/Legal View, a parallel description of the reasoning that is followed for each case is shown, making clear the logical differences of each patient. In my opinion, the differences in the two cases of Teresa and Terrence are trivial at best.
Suicide Assistant Do you believe assisting suicide should be legal? Three states in the United States have legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon , Vermont, and Washington. Should we consider this law assisted suicide or murder? Should it be used to kill yourself on purpose or should it be used for your medical conditions?
Speech language pathologists and therapists are very beneficial to patients who have Parkinson’s disease; they help control the lives of patients who suffer from motor
The enigmatic Hamlet once said, “To be, or not to be, that is the question.” In Hamlet’s soliloquy, he ponders on the idea of suicide and whether it would be a practical solution to all his problems, in other words was it better to live or to die? A situation parallel to Hamlet is the landmark case Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, where it discusses how the Constitution protects a person’s right to die and how states can regulate it. During 1983, a woman by the name of Nancy Cruzan laid in an eternal vegetative state after being involved in an auto collision, where she sustained severe injuries and was put on life-sustaining equipment. In addition, after five years with no signs of recovery, the Cruzan family asked to terminate her from the tubes that were feeding her, but were denied by the staff, without approval of the court.
The inevitable fact that addiction is a harmful disease and the recovery process is lifelong that consists of various stages of relapse raises a serious question. What is the duty of an addict in the jurisdiction towards the society? In the light of the legal standard, patient who is competent and incompetent is evaluated through the relevant questions of his or her desires at the present time, a living will, and the legal capability of forming a will. Furthermore, drug-addicts may be currently not competent but were formerly competent, and to explore the variable of declaration of the desires with regard to extraordinary means of treatment, is necessary (Harris, 2008, p. 244).
In cases when the pharmacological therapy can’t improve patient’s quality of life. Especially, when the patient keeps suffering from pain of the disease state and its complications. wouldn’t it be a better option to end the patient’s life rather than have the family witness the last memories of their loved ones in a deteriorating state? In addition, those resource can be allocated to treat patients who can benefit from the treatment and live with a better quality of
Should you let anyone or any animal go through pain only to die in the end anyway? This question is hard for many people to answer or even think about. Choosing to end another person's life can be justifiable if you are taking someone out of painful existence. Killing another is justifiable act in certain situations such as Capital Punishment and Euthanasia, also in the case of George and Lennie.
Would you want to live the rest of your life in extreme physical pain? The discussion of Assisted Suicide has sparked controversy around the world for decades. Assisted Suicide is when nurses end a patient’s life when they are suffering greatly from a mental or physical illness. Assisted Suicide has a dark history regarding who they killed and for what reason, and that needs to change with regulations. I believe that Assisted Suicide should remain in practice for those who are in constant physical pain due to chronic illnesses and diseases.
Physician assisted suicide is when a physician provides the means required to commit suicide, including prescribing lethal amounts of harmful drugs to a patient. In the United States alone, there is great controversy about physician assisted suicide. The issue is whether physician assisted suicide is murder or an act of sympathy for the patient. The main point is that terminally ill patients should have a right to physician assisted suicide if it meets their needs and is done properly. Physician assisted suicide is an appropriate action for the terminally ill that want to end their life in peace before it ends at the hands of the terminal disease.
As a daughter, granddaughter and friend, I am thoroughly concerned about the people surrounding me and their well-being. Just as any other family member or friend would feel about me, I would always want them to be happy and healthy. If these traits could no longer be an option in their lives, I would never want them to suffer for any reason. Assisted suicide is a deeply controversial topic in which I feel very strongly to share my view point on. It should be considered just as much of a crime to make a person live who does not wish to continue under their circumstances, as it is to take a life without consent.
Nurses are faced with ethical dilemmas related to clinical issues, and disease and treatment decisions daily (Kangasniemi,
Math In this area people don’t seem to know the term euthanasia. When worded in different ways people seem to know what it is. The most recognized being Physician assisted suicide. To word a question one way is to have a bias.