1. Define attorney-client privilege. We are NOT looking for a definition of the “confidentiality rule” (Illinois Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6). However, Comment 3 following Rule 1.6 will help you understand the distinction between the attorney-client privilege, and attorney-client confidentiality. You will need to provide more than just a restatement of this comment to answer this question.
According to Comment 3: Attorney-client privilege is when a lawyer can be called as a witness or even require evidence concerning their client. The Attorney-client privilege. 2. Provide at least one hypothetical example of a situation in which a waiver of the attorney-client privilege may exist. If the attorney was informed by the client
…show more content…
Please answer Parts A and B of this question.
A. Briefly describe a hypothetical factual situation which would likely mean that the paralegal working on a case would have a conflict of interest in that case. In your hypothetical, state the type of case and describe why there would likely be a conflict.
If the paralegal was working on a collision case which involved her best friend and her neighbor, but she was representing her neighbor; there would be a conflict in interest. The paralegal knows how her best friend drives, so when the neighbor makes accusations, it’s a conflict of interest because the paralegal might not agree of such. B. According to the “ABA Model Guidelines for the Utilization of Paralegal Services,” what steps can be taken in a law firm to create an effective screen in conflicts cases where the paralegal herself/himself has the conflict? Specify what precautions the law firm can take to screen the paralegal from the case in which the paralegal has a conflict. Identify and cite to the guideline and/or comment in these guidelines which govern this matter. It is insufficient to simply state that a screen must be created. You must explain ways in which the law firm employing the paralegal could create the
This can safeguard both their clients’ interests as well as their own professional
After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s
He also spoke on the phone with respondent’s wife and mother. He attempted once, unsuccessfully to meet with them; however, he did not follow up a second time. Additionally, the counsel did not seek out additional character witnesses for respondent. The counsel’s conversations with his client led him to believe he did not need to request a psychiatric examination because he did not believe the respondent had psychological problems. In a state of hopelessness, the counsel decided not to present nor look for further evidence concerning respondent’s character and emotional state, because he believed it would not overcome the evidentiary effect of the respondent’s confessions to the crimes.
On behalf of Carolyn Bekhor, I will provide you with more information regarding the potential career you may have in the paralegal field. According to the California Business and Professions Code section 6450. (a) a paralegal is a person who is qualified by education, training, or work experience, who is employed or retained by a lawyer, law office, corporation, or government agencies, assists an attorney and lastly is working under the attorney’s supervision. Which means you will be given certain legal tasks and duties to do for an attorney, which he then becomes responsible for. The tasks of a paralegal range from legal research and presentations, client interviews, drafting legal documents, briefing cases, and administrative tasks.
A) Case Name and Citation Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602 (1966) B) Summary of the Facts Ernesto A. Miranda a resident of Phoenix, Arizona was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman. The police arrested Miranda and held him at the police station for interrogation. After two hours of interrogation, Miranda confessed to having committed the crimes. His confession was used against him in trial and Miranda was found guilty.
FACTS All states and lawyer depend on state laws, Supreme Court ethics, legal ethics opinions and other stated regulation. Recently, the Supreme Court of Virginia declined the adoption of carefully formulated formal rule governing its paralegals. They were the proposed regulations that provided an imperative compendium of paralegals ‘pros and cons’.
o 4A: Describe ethical and legal issues related to shared information within an organisation, and the related procedures and conventions for privacy and permission. BYOD • Operating systems-The software that supports a computer's most simple functions, such as scheduling tasks and controlling external systems eg. Printer, mouse. • Application software-Application software is different computer programs designed to allow the user to be able to perform tasks and activities.
All human service workers have their own particular inward esteem framework and set of ethics. Conflicts occur within the helping field on an external and internal level. Everybody who works in a human service field, or who manages other individuals in an expert or paraprofessional limit is liable to a code of morals. There are various formal moral codes normally set around expert associations, however now and again by law that apply to individuals’ specifically professional positions. This paper attempts to address issues of consent, conflict of interest, unethical behavior and confidentiality on an internal and external level.
V. PRISON REFORMS The main part of this research paper is the reforms for the conditions of prison and make prison a better place for prisoner and make an alternative for incarceration. The prison Reform for prevention of overcrowding in prisons: A ten-point method for reducing the overcrowding in the prisons all over the world, these points are1: 1. Collect and use data to inform a rational, humane and cost-effective use of prison.
(John 7:51). The accused is charged and represented by a defense attorney who is responsible for advising the accused on what course of action to take. The accused
1. First and foremost, in regards to the case of Brady v. Maryland (1963), prosecuting attorneys withheld information from the courts in the conviction of Brady and Boblit for first degree murder. Boblit had written a confession before the trial stating he had committed the murder on his own, but due to the prosecution withholding exculpatory evidence, Brady was also convicted of the same murder. Brady petitioned the courts and the Supreme Court Ruled in favor of Brady, stating his rights of “due process” had been violated by the state of Maryland. It is from this case that a defendant may request Brady disclosure.
The family members of the patient Patricia N. Lee 75/F located in room 524 are in a dispute over who can see the patient. Both parties have restraining orders against each other. The daughter Lynda Lee has a restraining order against the boyfriend Robert Rolon who is the significant other of her sister Christa Lee Allender. Both parties are saying they have the Power Of Attorney for the patient. The Charge Nurse Colleen Gibbon separated the parties into two different areas.
1. A paralegal is “A person who performs certain substantive legal work for and delegated by a lawyer”. Paralegals will assist attorneys with clerical duties along with, meeting clients and keeping in contact with them, assisting in trials, take care of legal documents and proceedings, as well as planning and developing case information. To me they are the lawyers “backbone”.
Counsellors usually will obtain proper consent from client before make any disclosures of confidential information to third party. On top of that, if there is any conflict of interest, they will also inform the client in advance whenever it is predictable. The principle of autonomy is in opposition to the manipulation of
They do this by receiving informed and signed consent from themselves and the client. Within this consent, will be the aim of not sharing information with any person and moreover, the client and the counsellor to contain a formal understanding of one another. Confidentiality undermines the public trust of the profession. As when professionals conduct confidentiality, they are demonstrating the virtues of integrity, trust and respect towards the