Audience Analysis: Business Communication

I need to get better at reading books then writing about them. It’s difficult for me to read the book than talk about it. I can easily talk about a person or topic after doing research, but books are hard to

Throughout Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath several of the chapters are spaced by intercalary chapters. Which are chapters that contain general information on comments based off of the previous chapters presented. Intercalary chapters can be seen as a distraction or a “waste of space” to some readers. But, others believe that it is a great way to clarify what has happened in the preceding chapter. I for one believe that the use of intercalary chapters have assisted in aiding me with a better understanding of the overall meaning of Grapes of Wrath.

A few days ago, Trump used the chance of his inaugural address to the Congress to reiterate some important promises. He mentioned that we wanted to defeat the problem of drugs in the country and echoed the previous verbal promises of presidents, such as Ronal Reagan and Richard Nixon. His anger remained directed at hard drugs, such as heroin and never once did he mention marijuana, to the delight of many Americans. Trump promised during his speech that he will do everything in his power to slow down the drug issue and stop it altogether as part of his “Make America

Furthermore, the candle has extinguish, the time has stop and skull may represents death. All the factors may cause negative emotions, such as ungraciousness in people. Solutions to be more gracious Individuals We can make more individuals get out of their comfort zone like the book by using Kurt Lewin’s three-stage model of planned change to initiate, manage, and stabilize the change process where people learn new values and perceptions to replace old behaviours and build better personality and attitudes like graciousness.

However, after reading this passage, I have learned that there are ways to avoid this. Lastly, I find his examples very helpful. I was very unfamiliar with some of his guidelines until he explained them with examples. So as a reader, the examples really helped me fully grasp what he was trying to

Traditional selective attention research suggest the selective attention strategy is not an adequate generalexplanation for why readers tend to learn and recall important text information better than less important text information (Reynolds and Arnold, 1982). I know it takes me forever to finish my work or study when there are distractions. I tend to stop focusing on my task, and start focusing on the distraction; which is almost anything that sound interesting or to loud. I will keep the principle in mind so that I can remember to avoid distractions that has nothing to do with what I am studying or doing.

However, she claims that this is the only reason, and explains that even with spelling errors and abbreviations; the messagee will still understand the message. Lastly Trubek says, that the line between written- and oral language will become even blurrier than it already is, and because of this, more variations should be recognised Lee Simmons writes in the article “Spelling: A Rebuttal From Wired’s Copydesk”, that he agrees with Trubek on some of her points. He thinks that when it comes to texts and grocery lists, your spelling does not matter as much, since you are writing to an audience who will most likely understand what you mean. However, Simmons is also saying that when you are writing something that actually matters, e.g. when a state senator writes a bill, spelling is important to avoid any miscommunication. ”Careful spelling is more important in the digital era, not less.

The first is to hear each other out and try to work things out together,

Another weakness is Grammar mistakes, like using farther instead of further. They way i can improve upon these weaknesses is practicing verb editing, knowing where to put commas, periods and apostrophes. Another way i can improve on these mistakes is limiting and cutting ideas that are not needed, and seeing what best fits in my paper. My end of semester writing is way different then my writing from earlier in the semester. A paper i did from earlier in the semester ‘’Book 's/Knowledge Fahrenheit 451’’i lacked main focus, poor connections, too many idea’s, organization and some grammar.

Editing means that you re-look your writing, sentence construction, lay-out and format and improve on what you have already done. Below are some choices of words and other considerations that will need attention when editing work. Some people find this exercise boring, but remember, practice makes perfect! (8962 SO 1 AC 7 S0 3 AC 1/2/3 8964 SO 3 AC 1) Using Synonyms Try to avoid using the same word over and over in your piece.

According to him, the most common characteristic in political writing is staleness. 4) Various examples are given on how we can be vague, but that this should be avoided at all costs seeing that, it often lacks meaning and avoiding this will result in thinking clearly. 1) To improve your skills you should decide a purpose, practice all the fundamentals, and look for a meaning while writing down new words. 2) State your topic as a question, be specific about what your claim is and try to answer that question. 3) All writing must have a purpose and a goal, what you write and how you write it will be influenced by what you envision, and there should always be a clear

Mistakes help me see what not to do, therefore, on my next attempt I can get it right. The areas I feel like I need the most assistance in are analyzing literature and being able to give a detailed description of the works. I struggle with being too vague and not giving an in depth analysis of the pieces. Another aspect I find difficult is getting to the word count on my writing

Next, the lower order concerns in my synthesis paper were word choices and run-ons. I tried using "fancy" words when in reality, simple words create the same power when used properly. Reading my paper aloud helped catch run-ons which made some areas hard to understand. A strength in the revision process was understanding that revision is not simply fixing commas and periods, but reconsidering arguments, and reorganizing the purpose.

For example, I intended to discuss both negative and positive possible interpretations of the Brecht quote, and indicated as much, until that intention was entirely ignored in favor of finishing the essay. Although that is simply an issue of time, it is important to know what is prudent to include in a paper and what is not, especially in a timed setting. Also due to the timed setting was the problem of messy and inefficient sentence structure, which is something I attempt to keep high standards for. The inability to think out word choice before writing led to repetition and awkward word

Writing a paper is a long and sometimes strenuous process. In Garrison Keillor’s “How to Write a Letter”, Richard Lederer’s “The Case for the Strength and Grace of Short Words”, and David Shipley and Will Schwalbe’s “How to Write (the Perfect) Email” authors are taught how to craft a compelling piece of literature. To write an effective work, the author must go through the arduous task of planning, drafting, revising, and editing. Each one of these procedure takes time, effort, and patience. If the author seeks to create a noteworthy paper, then it is vital that they follow every step with the rigor and determination mentioned in the professional authors’ writings.