Australian involvement in the Korean War 1. What does source B reveal about tactics used by Chinese and north Korean troops? In source B, it is revealed that the North Korean and the Chinese spies disguised themselves as refugees, and smuggled grenades and automatic weapons underneath the loose clothing. 2. Examine Sources A and D. What challenges were faced by Australian soldiers during the Korean War? After examining source A and D, it is evident that there were a few challenges that the Australian troops faced. The majority of land in Korea is mountainous with sharp peaks and razor back bridges. The weather varied from hot, humid conditions to bitterly cold throughout the year which is hard to adapt. “We were marched across the mountains …show more content…
To what extent do the views expressed in source F support those in source E? Be sure to discuss similarities and differences between the sources, and use evidence from the sources to support your answer To a large extent, the views expressed in source F is supported with those in source E. Source F states that the prisoners of war was “beaten and punched”, in source E it also states that the prisoners of war were “beat with rifle butts until unconsciousness.” Both sources also stated that they were restricted in a confined spaces. “Totally dark tunnel 2 metres high and wide, 10 metres long, where prisoners sat side-by-side in the stench of an open-hole toilet.”(Source F) “They crowded us in a little cell called the sweat box. We had to stand, or sit with our legs outstretched.” (Source E) Although both sources supports one another’s views, there several aspects in source F that are not included in Source E. For example, Lieutenant G.R. Harvey states that he spent “45 days in a metre square, 2 metres deep hole in the ground” compared to source E where it only stated that “upon release from the sweat box, we had to write a confession, or ‘self-criticism’.” Also both sources mentioned different types of punishments. Overall, the views expressed in source F support those in source
The conditions and terrain in which they were fighting in were horrendous and overrun with diseases. Despite all this, the Australians were victorious; pushing the Japanese back to the north coast – and finally defeated them at Sanananda. The recruitment for Kokoda were young kids off the street, forced to be in the army with little to no training or fighting experience. To the AIF, they were known as ‘chocolate soldiers’ or ‘chocos’; because they thought they would “melt under pressure”.
These events solidified the resolve of the Australian military, never to fight a battle on its own shores a policy that is still maintained, further the battle of Kokoda was one of the first occasions where Australia and American forces combined in a military alliance with this alliance strengthen from this point onward with Americas now being a major partner in the defence in the
Within 10 weeks, Japan had dominated Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaya and Rabaul. The biggest town in north of Australia was Darwin which was a key defensive position against an aggressive Japan. Darwin was going to be a base for naval and air operations against the war in south east Asia. The intention of the attack was to scare Australia to become neutral in the war.
Kokoda was a brutal and deadly battle between Australia and Japan during WWII. This battle was a major turning point in Australian history and helped to develop Australia as a country. The Kokoda campaign of World War II, caused by conflict and cooperation, has shaped the Australian identity that is still evident today in the 21st century. This essay will discuss how conflict and cooperation caused the Kokoda campaign, what it was, and the long-term and short-term implications of the Kokoda campaign.
Two major events events occurred as the Australian’s and Japanese fought along the Kokoda Trail. On the 6th July, 1942, approximately 300 men from the Papuan Infantry Battalion (PIB) and young Australian men form the 39th Militia Battalion, known
Although there were a number of Australian casualties, in relation to the Viet-Cong troops, Australia had a lot less. “There were 18 Australians killed - 17 from D Company and one from the 1st Armoured Personnel Carrier Squadron - and 21 wounded.” As seen through source B, the efforts of the Australian troops are reflective of the number of casualties, in relation to the number they were fighting against, being up to two thousand, five hundred
In the prison the prisoner had their cells. The cells were just a room with a bed and a toilet, and there were cells to punish them There was a cell named the dark cell, the cell was only 15 feet by 15 feet the prisoners would be locked in that cell for days depending on what they did and how bad it was. When the prisoners were in the cell they could not talk to anyone. For food the prisoners only got a bread and water once a day, they were stripped in their underwear in the cell. The cell had a cage like outter layer for when the prison guards would give the inmates food, they wouldn’t try to escape.
In an unambiguous way if the Australian army did not showcase this perseverance and extreme moral they would have been forced back, letting the Japanese take control then giving the Axis powers more
They were then stripped: Wiesel says, “For us, this was true equality: nakedness.” (pg. 32) In that moment, their definitions of basic human rights were altered forever. Their hair was shaved and their bodies’ doused in petrol. Trapped in a prison that could only be described as hell, they were worked like mules by day and slept cramped in barracks by night.
Australia’s largest reason for our involvement in the Vietnam War was to help and show support to our ally, the United States. The United States of America was a very powerful and influential nation at the time of the Vietnam War, and to show our support for them the Australian government decided to commit troops to the United States war effort. A very large reason why there was so much emphasis put on Vietnam, was to do with a theory called the domino effect. This effect is described, as a communist victory in one nation would quickly lead to a chain reaction of communist victories in neighboring states.
He states, "They mocked us for not speaking the language,” Valdez says of the jail guards. “We would talk to them and they ignored us” (Valdez). There were holes in the tents that let winds, rain, ect..in which drenched bedding, clothing,
The victims traveled by railway in cattle trucks. The victims kept in these wagons were kept in very poor conditions. When the prisoners were brought to the camp, they were not told what the camp actually was. They were told that they had arrived at a transit camp. The prisoners had to undress for disinfection and showering before entering the main camp.
In retrospect, however, the United States should not have entered the war. Not being a part of the war would have saved American lives and money, potentially eliminated PTSD in a generation on soldiers, and would have prevented the animosity that exist between the United States and North Korea that dominates the headlines today. The Korean War was fought between two major wars, Word War II and the Vietnam War. Due to being fought between these major wars, the Korean War is known as “The Forgotten War.” The Korean War started on June 25, 1950 and ended July 23, 1953.
Some German trenches were captured Australian brigades, however, due to having so few men compared to the Germans, they were forced to
They were stripped naked and had all their personal possessions removed. They were only given a prison dress and has a chain on their right foot. On the other hand, the guards wore identical khakis. They were instructed to do whatever they thought is right to maintain law and order in the prison. But they are not given a permission to abuse the prisoners physically.