Autocratic style of leadership which is also known to many as authoritarian leadership places focus on one individual in charge of a group is run, this individual makes all the necessary decision with little or no input from the other member of the group. An authoritarian leader is very useful especially if this individual in charge of a group that is not enthusiastic or interested in getting the work done, this allows this leader to take control of this group and make the appropriate decisions in getting the work done, this leader work based on his or her judgement and do not give what he or she considers to be important duties to the other member of the group. There are a lot of downsides to an autocratic leadership style due to the fact the autocratic leaders makes al the decisions in the group it can cause the other group members to resent them or to feel inferior to them.
In both leadership styles, the leader is the one to ultimately have the last word in the decision-making process. In both, group members are delegated activities and, although they are more scrutinized under an autocratic leadership style, they cannot be monitored 24/7, therefore leaders eventually have to give their subordinates some space to fulfill their activities. Both type of leaders have to offer guidance for their subordinates since they will not always clearly understand the activities delegated to them. Therefore, both type of leaders have to be clear and objective when assigning tasks and activities to their subordinates. Also, both leadership styles are similar in that they cannot be implemented in all scenarios.
Examples of authoritarian leadership: A police officer directs traffic, and a teacher ordered students to perform his mission, and a supervisor to instruct subordinates to clean up the workstation. All these positions require a distinctive set of characteristics that give the leader position to get things in order or get a point across. Authoritarian qualities: Goals individually specify, engaged primarily in communication in one descending direction, and control the discussion with observers, and controls the
This style is used when leaders tell their employees what they want and how they want it to be done, without getting the opinions of their employees. Some of the appropriate situations to use this style is when the leaders have all the information to solve the problems, or when they are short on time, and their employees are well motivated. Some people tend to think of this style as a mean of yelling, insulting or threatening and it is a type of abuse, unprofessionalism , also known as "Boss of all people" rather than Autocratic .” This style of work will definitely never be presented in the dictionary of a talented leader. However,the authoritarian style should normally only be used on some special occasions. If you have the time and want to receive more commitment and greater motivation from your employees, then you should use the Democratic style.
Leaders can be good or bad, but do people have to be either a good or bad leader to be effective? This leads to an important question--what makes an effective leader? An effective leader has to have firm control over who they are leading, sometimes through the use of fear or confusing language, or even through repetition of specific words and empathy, as seen in the novel 1984 and the speech “Four Freedoms”. In the text 1984, the government who is the leader is effective by using the method of fear.
The second important trait of a police leader is integrity. A leader should clearly exhibit a sense of integrity and honesty in their role. This legitimacy in integrity plays a major role in followership. Integrity includes loyalty and practicing what you preach no matter the emotional or social pressure involved (DuBrin,
Consultative style is focused on the final result by using the skills of others. A dictator is a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has an absolute, unrestricted control in a government, whereas participative leader involves the whole members of the group to identify the goals and to work for a desired result. Therefore participative leadership and dictatorship are two styles which are completely differ from each other. However, society sometimes mix them. For instance, great leader and president of Russian Federation Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is considered to be both dictator and participative leader.
In short, the situation, the conduct of operations demands it. Path goal leader are repeatedly brilliant individuals, who are dedicated, committed, possess high personal standards and an determined sense of duty. This kind of leaders have a tendency to be decisive, confident, eager to take charge and willing to accept responsibility. They exercise command easily, but tend to extract obedience. This kind of leadership is imposed by power, dominating and fear of punishment.
(5) Persuasion - Authoritarian leaders make decisions based on position and title, rather than persuasion. Servant leaders build effective group consensus in order to affect change. The ability to convince others to respond as a majority without using coercion is the foundation of teamwork. Leaders who ignore the principles of teamwork restrict the ability to lead and erode individual performance. This trait explicitly signifies the differences between authoritative leaders and servant leaders (Spears,