Georgiou et al (2013) conducted in Cyprus. He questioned 231 young adolescents about their cultural values and experiences with peers, they found that children from authoritarian homes were more likely to have experienced bullying -- both as victims and perpetrators .
Dekovic and Jannsens (1992; 1997); Karreman et al (2006); Piotrowski et al (2013) have suggested in their studies that children with authoritarian parents are actually less advanced when it comes to self-regulation and moral reasoning
Trinker et al (2012). Conducted a group of researchers on American middle and high school for over 18 months, they found that kids who identified their parents as more authoritarian were more likely to reject their parents as legitimate authority
…show more content…
Lamborn et al (1996); Steinberg et al (2009) have performed some studies on children from lower socioeconomic groups and they have failed to show any difference in academic performances between authoritative and authoritarian families.
Turkel and Tzer (2008) conducted a study on the students of Turkish high school, it was seen that children from authoritarian families were rated as less resourceful than children from authoritarian or permissive parents.
Martinez and Garcia (2008) have conducted few studies on Spanish and Brazilian adolescents and have reported that adolescents from authoritarian homes had lower self-esteem than the teens from authoritative or permissive families.
Schmittmann et al (2006); van Duijvenvoorde et al (2008), have performed few experiments that suggested that childre learn better from positive feedback than from negative feedback.
Chang (2003); Wang et al (2006) have conducted researches in China that suggested that children with harsh parents have more trouble regulating their emotions
…show more content…
They were also more likely to experience depersonalization--the feeling of watching oneself act without being in control of one’s actions.
Querido et al (2002) conducted a study on African-American pre-schooling children found that parents using authoritative parenting style reported that the authoritative caregivers were least likely to report externalizing behaviour problems in their children.
Chao (2001) suggested that authoritarian parenting may have different meanings in different cultures. Ruth Chao has argued that the Chinese version of authoritarian parenting is fundamentally different. Unlike Western authoritarian parents, Chinese authoritarian parents have closer relationships to their kids, and closeness is a predictor of higher school achievement.
Leung et al (1998); Chao (2001) have performed studies on children of Hong Kong Chinese and of Chinese immigrants to North America and have linked authoritarian parenting with higher school achievement.
Fletcher et al (1999) have conducted researches on authoritative parenting style and suggested that having at least one authoritative parent can make a big
Though this method make them appear to have a sense of agency, they are just damaging their authenticity by covering their efforts. They lack the agency they desire because they were not raised in the correct form. Chinese parents, on the other hand, raise their children to be firm and independent. It is almost as if Chinese parents program their children to succeed without the help of others no matter what costs. Chua differentiates the outcome of each parenting methods “Western parents are extremely self
There are many situations that using authoritarian parenting style could benefit many children who are minority. Using this strict and high strung parenting style could help these children succeed in life. Without being strict on them, they may end up hanging out around a bad crowd of people. Also, not being strict as a minority parent could lead them to not reaching for their dreams. So, therefore, the authoritarian
In The Glass Castle, Rex and Rosemary Walls can be categorized as permissive parents. Rex and Rosemary’s parenting style is permissive because they approach their children as more of a friend than a parental figure, they do not discipline their kids, and they have few demands expected from their kids. The Walls parents act more of a friend than a parent to their kids due to their easygoing nature. Rex brushes off Jeanette's complaint regarding Robbie’s inappropriate touching and does not take action as a normal parent should. Rex had the opportunity to punish Robbie for his behavior but decided not to: “I’m sure he just pawed you some, I knew you could handle yourself” (Walls 213).
A study investigated this exact scenario by comparing the parenting attitudes of Asian Indian mothers living in the United States with those living in India in a pool of fifty-seven mothers, 23 of which were living in the United, and 34 living in India (JAMBUNATHAN et al., 2016). The results from this study showed Asian Indian immigrant parents adopted an authoritative parenting style. This is because they believed by maintaining an authoritarian parenting style in the United States, they may be causing their child to accrue social disabilities associated with such parenting style. Also, the parents found European American parenting style balanced their traditional cultural expectations and values with the demands of the new, majority
Children who grow up with permissive parents tend to struggle academically and they may even exhibit behavioral problems for the reason that they will most likely not appreciate authority and
Parents with an authoritarian style have very high expectations of their children, yet provide very little in the way of feedback and nurturance” (Cherry). Essentially, it’s a ‘do what I say because I said so’ mindset. Throughout my childhood, there was never any negotiation; it was just if I did something slightly out of line, I would be punished. I had to eat my vegetables until I gagged; I wasn’t allowed to talk back or else my dad would hit me on the back of my hands with a ruler; They would take my phone and read through all of my texts and apps to make sure I wasn’t hiding anything from them even though I did nothing initially to warrant it. In Discipline and Punish, it explains how the panoptic schema can be used in any situation of power, and I believe this has been the way my parents’ have inflicted “a particular form of behaviour” on me (Foucault).
Using Baumrind’s framework of parenting styles, Kim (2002) recognizes that the authoritarian style, also called “the Korean way,” is greatly reflective of Korean American parental behavior. Due to the influence of the American host culture, however, Kim and Chung (2003) argue that the authoritative style is the most pervasive of the three parenting behaviors among Korean American parents. Their findings indicate the authoritarian parenting style as the second most common, whereas permissive behaviors are significantly less prominent. Although Korean children view strict parental behaviors as an expression of acceptance and love, Korean American adolescents perceive higher parental control as a sign of disapproval and rejection (Kim 2005). This is explained by the exposure and influence of American culture, which more often mirrors the permissive parenting style (Kim
These children score higher on a variety of measures of competence, social development, self-perceptions, and mental health compared to those in authoritarian, permissive, or neglectful homes (Klein & Ballentine, 2001). Authoritative parenting has been found to have a significant impact on adolescent school performance and engagement in high school (Steinberg, Lamborn, Dornbusch, & Darling, 1992). In addition, the authoritative parenting style also positively predicted emotion regulation among adolescents (Jabeen, Anis-ul-Haque, & Riaz, 2013). With warmth and responsiveness a feature of the authoritative parenting style, children are provided with a sense of security, and the experience of negative affect becomes less threatening to them (Davies & Cummings,
Another prominent theme among Asian parenting is the use of parental control and strictness. Asian parenting places a great deal of importance on parental authority, respecting parents and adults, and filial piety (Park, Kim, Chiang, & Ju, 2010). A third theme among Asian parenting focuses on the parental and societal
The American parents are seen to be accommodating when it comes to many issues of raising children. Chinese parenting is more abrasive than Americans. A Chinese parent, for example, will be violent in an aspect that they feel is not right with their children. They can beat their adolescent youth if they put on clothes is not right while an American will more likely to embrace the clothing (clc.org.au, 2017). American parents will request their children about something that needs to be done unlike their Chinese counterparts who will want to command that they do them
While authoritarian parents are exceptionally strict and controlling, authoritative parents are much warmer and communicative. Authoritarian parents have a strong sense of justice and need for obedience, authoritative parents balance between the child’s desire for independence and obedience. This effects child's social behaviour. Studies have shown that children having
Wang, Ming-Te and Sarah Kenny. "Parental Physical Punishment and Adolescent Adjustment: Bidirectionality and the Moderation Effects of Child Ethnicity and Parental Warmth. " Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol. 42, no. 5, July 2014, pp. 717-730.
Whether parenting style affecting children’s development has aroused a widespread discussion in society many years. In Hong Kong, the style is closer to authoritarian parenting in most of the family, a similar situation happened in other Asian countries such as China, Japan, and Singapore. The rationale behind this phenomenon are the traditional values and past experiences of parents. Most parents are trying to apply the same approach that they have faced before and also they are aiming at letting their children comply with them completely. Although authoritarian parenting might have its logic to a certain extent, this essay argues that authoritative parenting would be a better choice instead of authoritarian parenting in that allowing involvement
According to Hughes (2013), a lot of parents think the authoritarian is the best way to raise their children, but they do not know the authoritarian style has negative effects such as lack of self-confidence and more prone to depression. This means the authoritarian is not good to raise the children because it affect for their personalities and psyche. However, the parents who use authoritarian style, their children are successful in their school than other children (Marsiglia, Walczyk, Buboltz, and Griffith-Ross, 2007). This means there are positive and negative impacts of the authoritarian style. Even though the negative impacts of the authoritarian style are depression and poorer social skills, most parents use this style.
As the Journal of Adolescence; Personality and parenting style in parents of adolescents by Rose M.E. Huver, Roy Otten, Hein de Vries, Rutger C.M.E. Engels reported there are mainly four distinct parenting styles called Authoritative, Authoritarian, Indulgent, Uninvolved. Parents mainly use strict/parental control (parental demandingness) or parental support (parental responsiveness). In Authoritative parents use both strict/parental control (parental demandingness) and parental support (parental responsiveness) in raising their adolescents. For Authoritarian, the parents strict/parental control (parental demandingness). For Indulgent the parents only use parental support (parental responsiveness).