To a large extent, I disagree with this statement. Authoritarian and single-party leaders unsuccesfully attempted to use force as a means of rising to power and, once this proved to be unsuccesful, reverted to democratic methods in order establish power. This is evident when looking at how Mussolini established his role as Prime Minister in Italy. Mussolini initially used the “Blackshirts”, members of the paramilitary wing of the Fascist movement, as a means of intimidating people into supporting the Fascist Party. This intimidation and violence, however, was unsuccesful in the initial period of the Fascist movement, as shown by the November 1919 election results, when the Fascists did not win a single seat in the Chamber. Mussolini, however, …show more content…
This eventually led to the March on Rome. The March on Rome was, however, merely a bluff, as the aproximately 30 000 marchers would have easily been overpowered by the military. The King of Italy at the time, Victor Emmanuel, did, however, fear civil war as a result of the March on Rome, due to the fact that the military had previously shown to be sympathetic towards the Fascist movement’s causes. This unrest led politicians close to the King advising him to appoint Mussolini as Prime Minister, as they believed that Mussolini could be subjugated and that the Fascists could be induced to moderate their programme and behaviour. This highlights the fact that it was the result of an unstable government and military, rather than force, that led to Mussolini being established as Prime Minister. These elements can also be seen in Hitler’s rise to power. The Rühr crisis of 1923 was met by the German government at the time through ‘passive resistance’. This infuriated nationalists such as Hitler, who saw this passive resistance as the sign of a weak government. This led to Hitler organising an attempted March on Munich, the Munich Beer Hall Putsch of 1923. The force used by Hitler and the
Between World War I and World War II, there were various changes in leadership and power structures worldwide. Adolf Hitler, the Nazi leader of Germany, Vladimir Lenin communist leader of Russia; Benito Mussolini, the fascist dictator of Italy; Mohandas Gandhi, a political figure in India; and Emperor Meiji, the emperor of Japan during the Edo period, all of these people changed the power structure for their countries. For instance, Adolf Hitler, the Nazi fascist dictator of Germany and ex-chancellor, rose to power and brought effective measures to repair post-WWI Germany. There were many ways that these leaders demonstrated adequate power and authority: fear tactics, censorship, and the use of peace. Some of these methods of exerting control
The threat that Hitler had potential to take over Germany was what lead to his uprising. They tried to suppress his strength, but by doing so they allowed him to take full control over the
Powerful dictators such as Adolf Hitler of Nazi Germany, Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, and Benito Mussolini of Fascist Italy either promised to bring change to their countries, or were just brutal even in the beginning. Economical failures, striking fear in the people, and nationalism
Addison Schwarz 3/22/2016 Per: 5 World History Chapter 13 Study Guide Vocab Flapper Flappers were rebellious young women in the United States and Europe during the 1920s who went outside of society’s norms and showed off more of their body than what was previously acceptable. Prohibition The ban on manufacturing and selling of alcoholic beverages in the United States from 1920 to 1933.
Adolf Hitler was elected by the German masses and he became the most evil man in history with their full support. In order to determine why Hitler was able to gain so much support from the people it is important to look at his rise to power and the radicalization of German society. Author Kenneth C. Davis details the path that many dictators follow to consolidate power in his novel Strongman and this path applies perfectly to Adolf Hitler. Following the German loss in World War One, Germany was devastated and the Great Depression that soon followed caused detrimental harm to the fragile Weimar Republic. German citizens had no one to blame for their grievances until Hitler and his Nazi party used the German Jews as the scapegoat.
Brief Background: My great-grandma, Ruth Trumble, is 87 years old and suffers from minor alzheimer's disease. Her responses to the questions I asked her would sometimes vary and often led to a fair amount of confusion. With the assignment of this project I began to think about the fact that in just a few years time, these personal interviews won’t be possible. With that in mind, I took down my great-grandma's words with the goal of learning about how the war affected her while she is still capable of providing me with the information.
In 1919, Benito Mussolini described fascism as “A movement that would strike against the backwardness of the right and the destructiveness of the left.” That “Fascism sitting on the right, could also have sat on the mountain of the center… These words in any case do not have a fixed and unchanged: they do have a variable subject to location, time and spirit. We don’t give a damn about these empty terminologies and we despise those who are terrorized by these words.” Fascism came into prominence in the early 20th-century Europe. It originated in Italy during World War I.
Two such dictators were the infamous Adolf Hitler and the Soviet Union’s Stalin. Both ruled with an iron fist and demanded full support of their system whether they used terror or plain appeal. Totalitarianism,
Just nine years later, the Roman Empire and Renaissance periods, rather than seen as fallen and inefficient, are viewed as “brilliant phases of its history” (PGI 1952 5). The first is referenced as a period characterized by the birth of Christianity, engineering, and architecture: all things that would have been fascinating to the soldiers that such a country could start such a movement. The Renaissance is characterized as the period in which “Italy attained a kind of supremacy that owed…everything to the brilliance and achievements of its explorers, scientists, painters, writers, sculptors, architects, and others” (PGI 1952 6). Again, the blame is passed from the Fascist party to Mussolini himself who was killed in 1945. Words describing Italian history begin to change from negative to positive including words like “brilliant”, “enriched”, and
Fascist Italy also believed that women should get married and have many children. Mussolini, in 1927, started Battle for Births, where women were encouraged to have children. The more children they had, the better tax privileges they received; such as, large families received better tax benefits, unlike bachelors who were hit by high taxation. The Fascist government warmly welcomed mothers who bore more than five children. Mussolini wanted Italy’s population to be 60 million by 1950; however, the Battle for Births was a failure, and the birth rate went down between 1927 and
Communism believed in a classless society, while Fascism followed a dictatorship, but maintaining a dictatorship required the suppression of the people. Fascist ideology believed that “war alone brings up to their highest tension all human energies and puts the stamp of nobility upon the peoples who have the courage to meet it,” which requires constant violence to prove power (Lualdi 236). By 1924, Mussolini was able to gain 65% of the vote for fascism, but in 1933, the Nazi party only gained 44% of the vote, and even with a minority ruling party was able to gain control of the government. Both Mussolini and Hitler came into power through legal means, but Mussolini was named Prime Minister in the hopes of avoiding war but after gaining control. Yet after their legal rise into power, they used coercion and violence to further their fascist rulings.
376) This description of Fascism indicates a government that is involved in the lives of its citizens to an extreme degree. By illustrating the government as a “powerful form of personality”, Mussolini alludes to the Fascist characteristic of organicism, where the state is seen as an organic whole being. Mussolini continues his
History is comprised of so many figures and personalities who have made their mark – positively and negatively. Some people have made such a profound impact that their names become immemorial. Such is the case Benito Mussolini, the Italian dictator during the Second World War. His domestic and foreign policies at a time of war and turmoil that followed made him a name worthy of history books, even if these paint him in the negative light. His fascist focus and how he utilized this to manipulate Italians and the world, conveying the message that Italy no longer relies on class warfare and everyone is on an equal footing was appalling and amazing at the same time.
During the inter-war period (1920-1939), totalitarian ideas, Fascism and Nazism developed rapidly in Italy and Germany respectively. Fascism comes from an ancient Latin word fasces, which is referred to an axe tied with rods. It represents a symbol of authority in ancient Rome and became the symbol of Fascist party which rose in power in Italy in 1922. While Nazism rose in Germany in 1933, whose name came from the Nazi party, National Socialist German Worker’s Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei). They threatened world peace and became an important factor of the outbreak of the WW2.
In the late 1920’s, the Nazi party had little success but in 1933, Hitler and the Nazis came to power. Hitler was the leader of a small right-wing party with very extremist ideas. Within a couple of years this party was in control of Germany. The factors that caused Hitler’s success for the rise of Nazism has been studied ever since. Hitler’s organisation skills and personal traits helped to bring the Naizs into power.