In this article, Javier Corrales looks at the topic of regimes; hybrid, autocratic, authoritarian, democratic etc. Corrales presents us with two major questions. “What are the mechanisms by which a competitive authoritarian regime turns more autocratic?” And “What were the causes of Venezuela’s rapid move toward greater authoritarianism, especially in the last five years of Chavismo?” This article mostly examines Venezuela at the turn of 1999, when Hugo Chavez took office. Corrales focuses on “use, abuse, and non-use of the rule of law.” (p. 70) Corrales presents readers with two arguments. One which looks at the domestic aspects and the other on foreign policy. Beginning in the late 2000’s, there was a decline in competitiveness with the …show more content…
“Inconsistent and biased implementation of laws and regulations.” (p. 82) During Chavez ruling, the media world was prone to control. There was an increase in government-controlled media and a decrease in private independent media. This movement caused a decline in press media pluralism. Corrales recognized this shift as “communication hegemony.” (p. 83) Venezuela’s government-controlled medias displayed biases. While the private media was often heavily criticized. Noticeably this lead to the dwindling of private independent media. State funding was only given to those who were pro-government, certainly many other media channels followed and conformed to the state commands. More direct abuses of the law were the harassment of independent medias. Fines were imposed simply based on allegations and no solid evidences. State agencies might go as far as “pressuring editors to publish the ‘right’ stories’.” For example, there was an important march happening in Caracas, and no media outlet broadcasted the …show more content…
This trade agreement allowed certain Caribbean and Central-American countries to buy subsidized oil from Venezuela, but for “favorable financial returns.” Chavez’s economic aid expansion also included forgiveness and tolerance for those countries struggling to make debt payments. This expansion aimed to make Venezuela a major importer of good and services. Also opening oil trade to allied countries. Lastly, this move was meant to expand international information services. Chavez ultimately won diplomatic support from foreign countries, even those that did not agree with his policies, for the flow of petroproducts, petrosubsidies, petrodollars, and petrocontracts from
Do you know who "El Libertador" is? Simon Bolivar was a Venezuelan military and political pioneer who helped Latin American nations to accomplish their autonomy from Spain. Amid his lifetime, he helped nations, for example, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia to freedom. He likewise establish the frameworks of majority rule government in Latin America acting as president from 1819 to 1830 of the Hispanic-American republic known as Gran Colombia. Simon Bolivar was conceived July 1783, in Caracas, Venezuela to rich respectable folks in Venezuela.
“The victory at Boyacá liberated New Granada, and in December the independence of all the provinces of the viceroyalty was declared and Gran Colombia (which encompasses present-day Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, and Ecuador) was created with Simón Bolívar as president”. (Google.com). Bolivar is remembered as a hero in Venezuela because of his great example and bold
Chavez acquire most of his success by striking and using nonviolent acts. Many acknowledge that Chavez did a great job in fighting for the rights of farmworkers however many criticize his character. Matt Garcia a journalist for the University of California points out that during the victory of the grape strike of 1970 which passed the Agricultural Labor Relations Act Chavez “failed to adapt his strategy to fit the demands of a dynamic situation” (Garcia ; para5). Garcia demonstrates how after acquiring the ALRA act Chavez failed not pursuing contracts with growers and had a strong stubborn, and abusive character with others. To emphasize, although many criticize his strong personal character, his character lead, Chavez to fight for the rights
When evaluating and providing background on important people in the history of different countries, many readers an historians find it helpful to compare this historical figure to other historical figures in history. These comparisons can be both educational and accurate and they can be inaccurate and can stretch different characteristics of people to fit with the other person in the comparison. One comparison historians often make is the comparison between Venezuela’s Simón Bolivar and Colonial America’s George Washington. This comparison is not exactly accurate as there as several differences between them and they had majorly different outcomes in the end. In addition, Bolivar viewed his outcome in a manner that was vastly inaccurate
Due to his protesting, active boycotting, and negotiating with crop owners, Chavez was finally able to persuade or enforce the recognition of the strife that the laborers had been vying to
“¡Si se puede!” This was the rallying cry of the most influential farm laborers union of the late 20th century. A motto that inflicted hope and confidence in the tired farm workers in California and Arizona. This quote described Cesar Chavez’ life, from his childhood to death. Chavez was an important figure in American History because he improved the lives of farm workers, the reason we have food on our table.
The following year, he led a 340-miles march along the California coast in order to gain state government to unite the farm workers together. During the time, they also got involve in conflict with other organizations as well. But in the end they manage to sign a three-year contract for pay raise with the grape growers. Their achievement was not only for the Mexican-American workers but for all the migrant workers in the nation. Although during the time, Chavez’s organization got into a conflict with another organization called Teamsters over the jurisdiction.
Mexico’s drug cartels are the worst they have been in years, and all the problems stem from a lack of proper decision making from the government at every level . Since Colombia was taken away from the drug scene, Mexico’s cartels have made up for the slack and then some. Subsequently, cartels in Mexico also began to flourish at a time when Mexico was in the process of instituting a new form of government. Not only is Mexico trying to work out the kinks of their new democracy, but the cartels are pushing more drugs than ever before; Mexico needs to address this problem. To make matters worse, a number of Mexican officials are corrupt, unaccountable, or distrusted by the people.
In this essay you will learn more about how and why he was such a good leader and why so many people looked up to him. Chavez was never a rich man. When he was a kid him and his family packed up from arizona and went to california. They only had 40 dollars to there name. He had to have a lot of courage to move at such a young age and to survive during this time was extremely difficult.
Cesar Chavez History Day Project One Mexican American farm worker dedicated his days to better the lives of his people, his name was Cesar Chavez. Horrendous treatment of farmworkers caused Chavez to take a stand for what he believed in, for no one should be treated poorly because of race or social class. During Chavez’s life, he organized peaceful protests, boycotts, as well as participated in a historic 36 day "Fast for life". Chavez not only changed the working rights for farm workers but subsequently gave dignity to the working class of America. The legacy that Cesar Chavez left behind was that he became the most important leader of the Latino people in the United States, and he founded the still standing United Farmworkers of America.
What made Cesar Chavez an Effective leader? Cesar Chavez was born in Yuma,Arizona in 1927. He moved a lot and went to 36 different schools. He lived through the Great Depression and worked in fruit and vegetable fields as a farmer. On a regular basis California farmers would face mistreatment and abuse mainly by the growers taking advantage of them all.
What Caused the Pueblo Revolt? Angelico Chavez believes the Pueblo Revolt was caused by the establishment of a new leader, Domingo Naranjo. As described to the Spaniards, Naranjo was a tall, black man with yellow eyes, and faked the image of the god Pohe-yemo. Domingo Naranjo was a Pueblo leader who claimed religious exile so he could gain the “power and revenge.”
The interest was so high that the Chavez couldn’t pay for it. As the result, they lost their house, their land, and everything. In 1939, Chavez and his family moved to California and became migrant farm workers after they lost their house and their land during the Great
A media source which ignores or censors important issues and events severely damages freedom of information. Many modern tabloids, twenty four hour news channels and other mainstream media sources have increasingly been criticized for not conforming to general standards of journalistic integrity. In nations described as authoritarian by most international think-tanks and NGOs media ownership is generally something very close to the complete state control over information in direct or indirect ways. Undesirable consequences which occur due to media imperialism are: • Commercially driven ultra-powerful mass market media is primarily loyal to sponsors i.e. advertisers and government rather than to the public interest.
But the positive interaction of government-press-society does not mean that each party must lose the function of its functional idealism. For if each existence is not approached with independent and interdependent responsibilities and obligations, it can be ascertained that each party will not be able to assume its rights and responsibilities. It means that the government should be given authority, as an authorized and responsible body to regulate the interests and spheres of its citizens. The press must remain authorized to carry out its distinctive social control functions.