The Carpenter 's Pencil by Manuel Rivas and The Secret River by Kate Grenville clearly present challenges to authority. Authority in the Carpenter 's Pencil is portrayed by various members of the military and, in a broader context, by General Franco 's regime, while authority is represented, initially, by the British government and later on by William Thornhill, in the Secret River. The use of such challenges towards authority have aided other techniques used by the author to further develop a character and to represent them in a positive or negative light.
Throughout The Carpenter 's Pencil, the sense of authority created by General Franco is present in everyday interactions and can be seen as the driving force behind the incidents which
…show more content…
This is due to the fact that any centralised form of authority is left behind when William Thornhill is deported to Australia. Nevertheless, William Thornhill initially experienced the power of authority after he was caught stealing expensive Brazil wood from Mr. Lucas. Facing prosecution, Thornhill attempts to challenge judiciary authority by claiming to be "as innocent as an unborn child". Resulting to lying as a means of challenging and evading authority may make Thornhill appear morally weak in the eyes of the reader, however, considering the time period in which the novel takes place - a time period where stealing can result in death - the reader starts to feel sympathy for Thornhill and rather starts to view the authority in the story as corrupted and socially discriminatory. This is also seen in The Carpenter 's Pencil, when Dombodán was unfairly prosecuted by a corrupt military …show more content…
Initially, William is assigned as a prisoner to his "master" and wife, Sal. However, it is clear that this relationship of a difference in power is not accurate as William continues to live with his wife and Sal urges William to attempt to gain freedom as soon as possible. However, such a relationship of master and prisoner is established once William convinces Sal to come with him to settle a piece of land on the shores of the Hawkesbury river for five years. From the first day on which they arrived, Sal began marking the number of days left on a piece of wood in the same manner as to how a prisoner would do so on the walls of his cell. This is further made evident in the book when it states that "the unspoken between them was that she was a prisoner here.". Thornhill 's newly created sense of authority is immediately employed when Aborigines come to his house to indicate that he had destroyed one of their food sources: daisy roots. Thornhill tells them to go away and starts hitting an elderly man when he takes Thornhill 's shovel. This scene, in a sense, indicates two challenges of authority. On the one hand, the Aborigines challenge Thornhill 's authority by confronting him and by attempting to take his shovel, doing this since they live by the mantra which is used throughout the novel by Blackwood: "Give a little, take a little". This first challenge of authority is appreciated by the
Quiroga’s literary pieces have been undoubtedly influenced by tragedy and death encountered in his life. His devotion for Edgar Allan Poe’s caliginous style enforced him to delve into gothic themes in his works; such as death. The element of the ‘fantastic plot’ also persists in his literature, as explored in ‘"El almohadón de plumas" – In this passage, Quiroga conforms to illustrate the characterization and setting of the short story.
For Pearson, allusions to the Redfern Speech alongside clever implementation of inclusive language facilitate the notion that Indigenous issues are a concern for the nation as a whole. This is evident through the usage of ‘our nation’ and the actions that ‘we’ have to take to correct the injustices of the past, which has the effect of reconciling the divide between Indigenous and European Australians; thus unifying the nation. Atwood, on the other hand, employs pathos through personal anecdotes and humour in order to establish a relationship with her audience. This provides her textual integrity, as it resonates with her audience on a personal level. The humorous personal anecdote of her daughter’s breakfast play allows Atwood to reinforce her argument that in order to ignite interest in literature “something else has to happen”, assisting her audience to emotionally identify with her perspective.
"Roger ran round the heap, prodding with his spear... The sow collapsed under them and they were heavy and fulfilled upon her(120)," the boys have conquered nature after killing the sow and represents the terror man is going to bring nature . However, there are also signs of nature cleansing the boys’ terror on the island. “The line of his cheek silvered and the turn
While embarking on a long voyage, he realizes how similar his is lifestyle to the slave’s. Similarly to them, he is punished, eats loathsome food, and is confined to the compacted ship. Aboard the Moonlight Jessie witnesses horrifying behavior towards the helpless
You tell me, and I won’t put it down on the form, No-one will know but you and me”. It’s obvious that the author, Thomas King, is trying to make awareness about the treatment of Aboriginals are facing in
During the various battles, March experiences the horror of war and begins to think about his past. One of his memories is one of his wealthy friends Mr. Clement. March learns that Clement owns slaves and he falls in love with one of them named Grace. March began teaching the slaves how to read and write, however, Clement
While repeating the ‘Australian Dream’ to exhibit its irony and fallacy. Included was the demonisation of pop cultural figures, among them Charles Dickens, which alienates the audiences views, and asks them to question previously assumed realities. Talking from a voice of authority Grant distinguishes his aboriginal heritage and outlines his inherited past, one full of violence and injustice. Heavy use of hand gestures and passionate vocal tones, reinforced by strong eye contact and a lack of reliance on notes.
Not only did Bob Ewell committed a sinful act against his family, he blamed his actions on someone else. Obviously, his actions display how he committed evil actions. In addition, he fought and harassed people who he opposed of. This includes Tom’s lawyer and his family, his own family, and townspeople. He was rated sixth on the evil scale because of the unjust actions that he caused, and committed.
“Yes, sir, he gives me enough, such as it is.” The colonel, after ascertaining where the slave belonged, rode on; the man also went on about his business, not dreaming that he had been conversing with his master. He thought, said, and heard nothing more of the matter, until two or three weeks afterwards. The poor man was then informed by his overseer that, for having found fault with his master, he was now to be sold to a Georgia trader. He was immediately chained and handcuffed; and thus, without a moment’s warning, he was snatched away, and forever sundered, from his family and friends, by a hand more unrelenting than death.”
Golding portrays mans evil through the boys' need to undermine others. In the beginning of the book Jack becomes obsessed with hunting the wild pigs that live on the island. “Jack was bent double. He was down like a sprinter, his nose only a few inches from the humid earth … Then dog-like, uncomfortably on all fours yet unheeding his discomfort,
He deciphers a way to tell the readers that as human beings, there are just as many ways to lose power as there are to gain it. Piggy is the main source of this information, and through his past, and the ways he acts, he somehow manages to show the readers the significance of how, through our personalities and things we can’t help, we lose so much power. Many books and novels in this world focus on the things that help us gain power and leadership, but the fact that Golding did the opposite, makes this book stand out more than the others. For the boys on the island, power is a big struggle; there are always fights over who gets to speak and who gets to be in charge and make all of the major decision. Through these fights and through these arguments, William Golding shows that power is a hard thing to grasp and it is something that is even harder to maintain.
John le Carré’s novel “The Spy Who Came in from the Cold” dives us into the life of Alec Leamas, a British spy during the Cold War era in Europe. The spy has one final mission to complete before he can finally “come in from the cold.” Leamas’ mission, given by Control, is to eliminate Hans-Dieter Mundt, the head of the Abteilung in Germany. What Leamas is not aware of is the many complications and inner battles he will run into and must overcome to reach his mission objective. Throughout the story, these complications will be seen in themes such as deception, seduction and abandonment, which are all involved in the plot and will be analyzed, as well as the recurrence of unkept promises by characters and agencies across the chapters of the book.
There Is More Than One Type of Hero In “Notes from the Underground”, a fiction book by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, the Underground Man is not like the traditional main character in most other fiction books. Often books have a tragic hero where he or she either saves the days or unfortunately is killed. But that is not the case for this book, the main character shows characteristics that do not fit along the lines of a tragic hero at all. This paper argues that the Underground Man is most definitely not the tragic hero, but instead an anti-hero.
The spear helps to represent family, and the courage that family gave Maud and the Grandmother to stand up to constable Riggs motivated by the thoughts of seeing their children again. The hostile relationship between Constable Riggs and Maud is comparable to the white settlers and the indigenous people of Australia. It shows not only the courage shown by aboriginals throughout the ordeal as well as the very slow change in power between all races as not only aboriginals but any culture or race that was once at a disadvantage starts to regain equality and show courage every day in a sometimes cruel society. Studying the film, Rabbit Proof Fence helped me learn about how ideas are conveyed through character relationships and film techniques. By
The Underground Man strives to have a role of authority over other individuals, however, his low insignificant position in society detains him from even feeling socially