Means the historian’s task is less mimetic and the novelist can create additions to the record. Milan Kundera illustrates the differences between the historian and novelist in the Art of the Novel: A historian tells you about events that have taken place. … A novel examines not reality but existence. And existence is not what has occurred, existence is a realm of human possibilities, … Novelists draw up the map of existence by discovering this or that human possibilities. If a writer considers a historical situation a fresh and revealing possibility of human world, he will want to describe it as it is.
History and historical fiction are virtually identical, realistically only being separated by one major difference; history is an account of the past, presented through facts while historical fiction recognizes the facts but is flexible with the author’s use of fiction. At face value, historical fiction appears to be virtually pointless; why would fiction be relevant in history, a recollection of the past based on facts? A historical novelist, Steve Wiegenstein, discussed the purpose of historical fiction in his writing “Understanding the Past” where he states, “We turn to historical fiction not for a comprehensive understanding of an era or event but for a sense of what the lived experience of that era would have been like; not for what happened,
Looking for the similarities and differences between these two books may seem somewhat challenging, but in reality, it’s not that complicated. Considering both books were written one after the other it could be said that one is the sequel to the other, but with an entire different story following different characters. The concern with comparing and contrasting these two books is to understand what are the most noteworthy similarities and differences. Frequently, one can mistake smaller details that are insignificant with substantial details that can really help to see what indeed are the differences and similarities. Considering all of this, comparing and contrasting these books comes more smoothly than
Regardless of whether characters in the books we read reflect others or ourselves, what is most critical is interfacing with them in ways that allow us to comprehend our identity today. Here and there finding out about our history through the eyes of various characters can be agitating or even agonizing, yet it additionally can be an enlivening to the obscure. Diversity in literature is also important because it has some influence on how different people are seen or not by some other cultures according to literature. When analyzing literary works, we must first see the structure of the work such as plot, which is the way that the author arranges the ideas or incidents that have place in the story. We also must take a close look to the character which is essential to the plot, without characters the writing would not have a true sense.
John Gardner’s wrote Grendel in a first point of view whereas, in Beowulf epic had Grendel in third point of view. Gardner’s novel has made a significant picture for Grendel than the epic. The good and evil personality has been the main conflict for both stories. However, Grendel in Gardner’s novel is confused how the universe goes but realized that there is some sort of pattern going on. Grendel is seeking to find the meaning of the life.
Although it can be expected from a fiction writer that the representation can be highly subjective, it seems to be not the case with Mitchell: her portrayal of the subject under discussion departs only insignificantly from the one presented by such contemporary historians as Gail Collins, George C. Rable and Bertram Wyatt-Brown. To show this conformity/congruity of opinion, examples from both the literary text and the scholarly texts are provided in this and the following sections of the paper. At this point, it must also be mentioned that due to the small size of this paper and the frequency of comments on the following topics in the novel, it seems expedient to examine more closely three issues regulated by the code of honor of Southern ladies: dependent status, marriage and
Even though books have similar, or this case, the same, topic, that does not guarantee you will get the same information from both books. Biographies include mostly facts and are researched by an author and checked to make sure that there is evidence to support everything they write. Facts can be proven true with evidence. Autobiographies contain facts too, but they are accounts of events in an individual’s life and even though they try to stick to the facts, often their own opinions are in the text too. An opinion is how a person feels about something.
History Portrayed in Literature vs. Informational Text If one has ever read the short story, “Rip van Winkle” by Washington Irving or the informational text “George vs. George” by Rosalyn Schanzer, one will notice how the short story is a piece of literature that takes place at a crucial point in history, and how the informational text takes place around that same time as well. However, that individual may not observe at first how the facts are presented and incorporated differently in each text. Literature uses a bias, is meant to entertain readers, and uses not all true information when talking about history. On the contrary, informational text is unbiased, its purpose is to inform the reader, and it always uses true information when talking about history. While both types may base their text off of actual events, they also both have many differences when presenting the information.
Character is a person who is responsible for the thoughts and action within a story, drama or other literature. In literary, character is presumably an imagined person who inhabits a story although that simple definition may admit to a few exceptions (Kennedy and Gioia, 2003: 91). Madden (2002:93) divides the character as follows: Protagonist is the main character in story, antagonist is the character or characters who seem to be a major force in opposition to the protagonist, flat or stock characters is when characters lack the development that seems to bring them to life, lack the complexity that lets us know them as we know people in our own lives, and seem to represent ―types‖ more than real personalities, round characters is when they seem fully developed, with all the complexities of real people. Conflict insociologyterm is a organization known as The Conflict paradox, namely the view that in terms of conflict is considered to improve the performance of the group. Whereas, conflict is a problem that should be shoaled by the main character of the story.
that are being put into a media cannot be taken for granted. Like many mass media, literary works such as poem, play, and novel are another medium for people to construct the image of one kind after another. Unlike poems and plays, novel is said to be the most difficult to be developed whereas it is the hardest and the latest to evolve among the three kinds of literature. Novel as a 2 product of collective ideas from human thought may undergo some processes including myth, morality, laws, and history of a particular time which add complexities of a novel. Either these are believed to be true or not, an image of a thing or a figure is indeed and inevitably being constructed through author‟s point of view (Childs, 2005: 157).