Essay On The Giver

What if we lived in a world of peace and equality? What if we lived in a world with no differences? A world with no social classes and inequality. That sounds pretty amazing doesn’t it? In Lois Lowry’s novel The Giver that is the reality. The catch? The catch is freedom. There is no room for being different, no room for spontaneity, no room for experimentation and breaking the rules. If you break the rules you will be caught and their is no room for forgiveness. Also, if you are diagnosed with a disease, or just simply sick, you must likely will be released into the “elsewhere” world.

Memories are one of the most important parts of life, there is no true happiness without the reminiscence of pain or love. This concept is portrayed in "The Giver" by Lois Lowry. The story tells of a 12-year old Jonas, who lives in a “utopian” society, where all bad memories are destroyed to avoid the feeling of pain. Jonas becomes the receiver, someone who receives good and bad memories, and he is transmitted memories of pain and pleasure from The Giver and is taught to keep the secret to himself. The author shows one should cherish memories, whether it be good or bad, as they are all of what is left of the past, and we should learn from it as to better ourselves in the future. The characters and conflicts reinforce the idea that if you do not learn from the mistakes you have made in the past, you can repeat them.

Imagine a world where you could make all of your own choices , make all of your day-dreams of what life could be like come true. That world does not support governments that will make choice for you. That world is what the giver, written by Lois lowry promotes, that world is anarchy.

A wise man once said, “life's not worth living is you can't have fun.”- Sophia Loren

Attention grabber. The Giver, Anthem, and Fahrenheit 451 are all about future societies who are being controlled by a higher power. These higher powers control everything these people do. By doing so, the people in charge have taken the people's uniqueness. A warning against strict authority is evident in all three societies resulting in a loss of individuality.

Every moment is a memorable part of the journey of life. I have always appreciated the value of giving to others because I believe that just being able to lend a hand to others, no matter how trivial it may be, is what makes life worth living. However, my desire to help people started when I began working with children as a teacher’s assistant. It would instill in me a lesson that I would never forget.

Basically the author Peter Singer contends that it is evident that a grown-up should save a child from suffocating unless that individual is gambling something as profitable as the child's life. Singer points out that upwards of 27,000 children bite the dust consistently from poverty that could be effortlessly and inexpensively helped by existing. Moreover author likewise says that large portions of his reader appreciate no less than one extravagance that is less profitable than a child's life. Author has invests energy elucidating that individuals have a privilege to burn through cash any way they need, yet says that truth does not change the way one should spend it. The author additionally takes note of that a few individuals may be not interested

In The Giver by Lois Lowry, the main character, Jonas, can undoubtedly be considered a hero. Jonas’ actions throughout The Giver are a quality example of the archetypal pattern of the Hero’s journey, and to depict this I used a variety of text, illustration, and color throughout my graphic novel.

There are times when we experience events where our perspective of life changes and makes us change how we respond to new circumstances we encounter. In chapter seven, “Chump Change,” of Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success, the author, Adam Grant, describes two people as “failure givers” for caring about others more than themselves when it comes to their professional situations. These individuals went from being doormats, submissive people letting others dominate them, to successful givers, when they experienced disadvantages for helping others too much. For these individuals being a giver meant to help others in spite of sacrificing their own good. They were not aware that their perspective of giving would hurt their professional

The society Lowry depicts in The Giver is a utopian society; a perfect world as envisioned by its creators. It has removed fear, pain, famine, illness, conflict, and hatred, all things that most of people would like to eliminate in today’s society. In this utopian community, major problems are rare, only minor problems such as scraping your knee would happen. Even when this would happen there would be medications sent to them. In Lois Lowry’s award-winning novel, The Giver, Jonas’s society is considered to be utopian because the society has an overall sense of sameness, organization, and minimal problems.

Imagine a world where the government controls all choices. The Dystopian novel The Giver, by Lois Lowry, is set in a future where everything is the same. They have the same houses, clothes, and the same birthday. They have no choices or feelings. The society from The Giver would be a negative change from the current society because it limits choices, eliminates feelings, and abolishes color.

The Giver Essay How would you feel if you lived in a community whare thare was no diversity, no choice, and no memories? Well that's how it is for Jonas. Jonas lives in a community with his Mother, Father, little sister, and Gabriel a baby his father has taken in. Jonas

Throughout the novel, Lowery tries to spot lights on the psychological aspects within a utopic society, which forces the reader unintentionally to compare it to a normal society. A reader can conclude that human nature is the same no matter how different a society is. The debate of man’s will versus fate is introduced since the beginning of creation until this moment. Jonas was orbiting the loop of determining his future job and this made him different and uncategorized unlike his friends. Jonas’s destiny was unclear for him, but because of his different mentality and realization, he was chosen to be the Receiver of memories in the Community. In The Giver, destiny is not always a vague thing among citizens due to the systemized rules and routines.

Being a giver is hard, and it is even harder to be a successful giver. When givers are not aware of traps when giving, they can become doormats and get stepped all over by takers. Therefore, avoiding traps is important for givers. In order to be a successful giver, one needs to change their points of view when thinking about their struggles. According to Give and Take, the three traps are “too trusting, too empathetic, and too timid. ” I think change in a giver’s perspective is very influential towards how he or she will act and what result he or she will receive.

This book;”The Giver,” by Lois Lowry, has two major places (Elsewhere and the community) mentioned in it. There are many pros and cons of living in either, Elsewhere or the community. Elsewhere would be a better place because many things such as love, color, the concept of love, freedom, etc. exists. On the other hand, in the community, which is more influenced by people’s actions, still has some positives things, such as no lying, no concept of color, no war, etc. After looking at many pros and cons for choosing to live in either the community or Elsewhere, the outside world would be the better choice for living in for a couple of reasons.Those reasons are: a family can have as many children as they want, the concept of love is present, there