As people continue to respond to the killing of Michael Brown and the issue of police brutality. Many citizens of the United States say that putting body cameras on police would be a good solution. What people are trying to say is that the police do need cameras because for all the misleading and confusing stories. Americans want cameras on police to prevent any mix-up. Police brutality is a very serious issue and there are ways to resolve the issue.
C. Credibility: My interest in this topic is due to the latest deadly encounters with police officers and improving the communities’ safety. I’ve seen many cases in which many individuals or officers have been attacked badly and probably with the body camera being present that is less likely to happen. D. Thesis statement: I’m going to inform you about the pros and cons of police body cameras. E. Preview Points: 1. Background Information 2.The reasons why body cameras are used 3.Pros
“These officers are just defending themselves against being attacked. In the constitution it justifies the force of arms if you feel like your life is in danger. These officers are putting their lives on the line and have the right to use force- deadly force if necessary” (Brown). In this excerpt, Minister Keith Bell expressed his feelings on the police action shootings during the year 2014. “There are times when police [sic] are on routine patrol and their car gets shot up.
I mentioned a few reasons on how the use of force has made police officers look bad. It is making officers look bad because recordings from the public only show the beatings and shootings, but do not capture the beginning of the confrontation. It will be bet for officers and the goof being of the community I officers use body-worn cameras because it will capture every second that happens between confrontations. The use of force is granted to the officers if they feel like the suspect is dangerous or is not complying with the officer. It was a right given to them by a case back in 1985, in which a person was killed by deadly force.
On the same token, the instructor reminds them frequently not to harm any living things unless they were told to do so. This event foreshadows that one of the hunters will harm a living, messing up history. This creates suspense because the readers would want to find out if someone actually killed something they weren’t supposed
Our snap judgement can be framed. Even more in life or death situation or in an extreme situation, our rational part of the brain stops working and we have to rely on our snap judgement. However, with only snap judgement, we cannot mind-read like people with autism and cannot hear. This is why police officers kept beating or shooting fleeing criminals even when there's prohibition order. perception is needed
As a forensic psychologist, you will be able to get into Dahmer 's mind and decide for yourself if he is insane. Is he a deranged lunatic or just a malicious soul? Are we safe from psychopaths like Jeffrey Dahmer, or do we, along with our children and families, have to live in constant fear? As a forensic psychologist, you are able to help relieve the public from the fear they are walking amongst lunatics. It is extremely important to understand that physical evidence from a crime scene does not define someone as a person.
Law enforcement is ensuring an act of obedience to the law. Police officers often take advantage of enforcing the law and end up using violence when it 's not necessary. According to the Washington post ( 2015 ) every 28 hours an unarmed colored person is killed by a police officer. I think it is time for these and other victims who were treated unjustly by police officers to get justice. These deadly law enforcement incidents must come to an end.
Police are taught to shoot for the body’s centre mass and this brings a high likelihood that the person will be killed. A ‘shoot to disable’ doctrine is technically impracticable (Force Science Institute, 2010). So the use of firearms must always be considered as the application of lethal force. Police are also taught a continuous, rapid shooting technique rather than shoot once and observe, because a large percentage of people with life-threatening chest, abdomen and head wounds from a single round are “able to perform strenuous activity and to continue to physically fight” (Lewinski & Hudson, 2014, p. 1), including to kill or wound police officers and others (Lewinski & Hudson, 2014). This is especially the case with persons affected by excitatory substances who exhibit “great strength and resistance to pain” (Dolinak, Lew & Matshes, 2005, p. 307), combined with a propensity to extreme violence (American Council for Drug Education, 1999).
King states another important solution in his report saying that police departments must create and enforce reasonable new use of force standards. King says that police brutality occurs when the level of force being used does not match to the threat that is being posed. The case of Eric Garner is a perfect example where Garner was a suspect to selling Loosies (loose cigarettes) outside a store and was then put in a chokehold while being surrounded by multiple officers. Garner died from a situation that could have been handled differently. Police officers should be given better training on when they must utilize the use of force.