Everyone has a unique way in which they management conflict. Awareness of conflict can be just important as knowing how to manage it. There are a few aspects of conflict orientation, knowing these aspects can affect how one approaches conflict. The first of the conflict orientation is the lose-lose. This type assumes that the end result is that everyone loses. This form of orientation is unhealthy and can be destructive to relationships. Typically, this would not be the ideal choice when dealing with conflict. It can be beneficial in some situations. Instances in which the lose-lose may be used without damage is when the conflict is not worse the energy of conflict (Wood, 2014). Where to go for dinner or what blouse to wear to a …show more content…
This type is the most beneficial to all parties involved. This approach is about resolving the conflict with the best solution. The solution to the problem would be one where everyone is satisfied. When win-win can be used it should be to avoid the additional conflict because of the solution (Wood, 2014). Usually I am the type of person to avoid conflict when I can. I am also a realist and understand that sometimes it is impossible no matter the effort conflict does arise. In the instances I try to approach a situation with a win-win attitude. Most of the time there is a way to find a solution on which everyone can agree. I am the mother of three wonderful children. Most of the time they were well behaved and were not confrontation. They were still siblings and it is only natural that siblings fight from time to time. I can remember a time when they were fighting over who was going to sit in the front seat. They were all old enough to safely sit in the front passenger seat so the debate was between all three of them. Normally this would be considered a situation where lose-lose could be used because it is not a change of life conflict. Children have a unique way of looking at things. To my children this situation was life …show more content…
Some situations like where to eat or what movie to watch can be approached with a lose-lose situation because the conflict is not worthy of the situation. These decisions are not life altering and most time individuals will not fight over finding a solution (Wood, 2014). The win-lose orientation has a proper place. This would be more appropriate where only one solution will be the answer. Do we relocate the family for a new job and opportunity even though the benefit is mostly to one individual? This is a situation where win-lose is used. One person wins and all others lose (Wood, 2014). The ideal approach is the win-win. Coming up with a solution where all individuals involved win can be difficult and time consuming, but will result in less secondary conflicts (Wood,
Conflicts are challenges faced by people, which in turn helps them to succeed in their lives. In the novel The First Stone by Don Aker, Chad Kennedy faces different types of conflict that lead to positive personal growth. Chad was unable to cope with the death of his grandmother. His depression and anxiety led him to be unkind towards others.
Although they both care about the situation with their brothers,
Consensus may work in some predicaments but insisting it works in all is preposterous. When all is said and done, consensus is not the most effective strategy for decision making, it suppresses creativity, is rarely suitable, and compromises morals and values. In order to be successful, coming up with a resolution should be focused on the whites and blacks rather than the greys. Some things are better kept on paper like consensus
The main idea of rivalry over happiness is not chosen in some instances. Some people are that way on their own and we cannot change this. They are their own people and take care of things based on what they know. This is not a factor we cannot do
Conflict theory is everywhere I look within American; the country was born and thrives on conflict theory. This is something I have felt strong about for years. After doing some reading, the cross correlation between the three is amazing. However, I feel we have an extensive amount of Conflict Theory in society
I think that every conflict does have a winner because there can be more than one winner in a conflict. So, in Amigo Brothers, they walked out without knowing who the winner was, but they fought their best and they were both winners. Also, there can be an argument between two sides, but they could find out that what they were arguing about was a rumor. Then, they could make up, be friends, and they're two winners that resolve the conflict.
They try to smooth over or ignore conflict to keep everybody happy, they see conflict as destructive and will give in to others to maintain the peace (Page 38), Bryan is a very good Illustration of accommodation he sacrifice his needs for the group, he share’s his lunch with John, he writes the last easy for the group, he maintain peace among the group when john and andy was arguing. Even though bryan is trying trying to keep the peace in the group, he is has problems with himself and he sense unfairness and inequality throughout the film. Collaborating is a strategy is used in a I win, you win Situation. According to Patterson James “ The problem-solving or collaboration strategy is usually the best approach to win-win negations and the problem- solving strategy is usually the best way to cut through conflict. Make a decision and work toward win-win deals (page 41).
In addition to being one of the most entertaining shows to binge in the background of daily life, The Office is considered to be one of the more quotable comedies the 2000s brought us. The show’s compilation of lovable and often stereotypical characters provided us with nine seasons worth of memorable tomfoolery, character development, and one-liners. But for the purpose of this paper we will be looking beyond the plethora of “Worlds Best Boss” mugs and “That’s what she said” jokes, and taking a cold, analytical look at The Office to determine what the show offers in regard to interpersonal communication. In the first episode we are introduced to the shows connotation of conflict as we observe Dwight Schrute demonstrating a competitive conflict style in his reaction to Jim Halpert’s solidifying Dwight’s personal belongings in a jello mold.
Polite negotiation goes on for a while as the two family struggles to reach a decision between them.
In the case of the two families, greed has caused fights, and even the death of numerous family
The author states that the negotiation is all about trading, whether it is with spouse, a business partner, or somebody across the globe. It is emphasized that one needs to make sure that he/ she meets the needs of an opposing person. However, that’s quite different from the kind of business phrase “win-win” situation. It makes you to question the existence of a “win-win”. If applying a negotiation technique described in “Getting More”, there is no “win-win” in the business world.
It is in observing how people deal with and react to conflicts that we see clear differences between cultures. Some cultures view conflict as a positive thing, while others view it as something to be avoided. In the United States, conflict is not usually desirable; nonetheless, conventional wisdom in this country encourages individuals to deal directly with conflicts when they do arise. In fact, face-to-face encounters are usually suggested as the way to work through whatever problems exist. By contrast, in many Asian countries, open conflict is experienced as embarrassing or demeaning.
A. & Louw, A. E. (2014) also mentions that sibling disputes and their settlement may be viewed as opportunities in socialisation: they learn how to fight, to disagree and compromise within a safe environment. This is seen in the movie when the children come together at the top of the lighthouse to find ways to work together and break up their parents and to go back to their previous lives. The children were together in their safe environment and even agreeing to work together for their own happiness. Eventually the children became attached to each other due to working together. At the end, after they caused a big fight between their parents and they wanted to slit up, the children worked together to keep them together.
One person may end up giving in or the two come to a mutual agreement. The world is changing all around us, we are not the same in how we think or act, each of us are different and unique, however, together we all balance each other
It’s just like fighting fire with fire, neither will win because they are the same. If you are flexible with the situation, kind of like water, you will be put on the same, cooler level. Your life doesn’t count on battles of words and winning an argument to strive. You can count on happiness and helping the world to achieve.