TABLE OF CONTENT
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of study 1
1.2 Problem statement 3
1.3 Significance of study 3
1.4 Objective of study 4
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Melastoma malabathricum Linn. (Senduduk) 5
2.2 Phytochemical Screening 7
2.3 Test Organisms
2.3.1 Bacteria 8
2.3.2 Antibiotic 8
2.4 Modified Kriby-Bauer Disc Diffusion Method 8
2.5 Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) 8
2.6 Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) 9
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Material
3.1.1 Raw Material
3.1.2 Test Organisms
3.1.3 Control Antibiotic
3.1.4 Chemicals
3.1.5 Apparatus
3.2 Method
3.2.1 Collection and Preparation of sample
3.2.2 Sample Extraction
3.2.3 Phytochemical Screening
3.2.4 Antibacterial
…show more content…
For E. coli bacteria, will be cultured on MacConkey agar, while for S. typhimurium, will be culture on (Mueller Hinton Agar) MHA. The purpose of culturing the bacterial strain on specific agar is to obtain the pure culture of the bacteria. All plate will be incubated at 37oC for 24 hours to allow the growth of bacteria (Cavalieri et al., 2005).
3.2.4.3 Preparation and Standardizing Inoculums Suspension
4-5 colonies of each bacteria strain will be taken by using inoculating loop and suspended in 8 ml of 0.85% saline solution that adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standards in test tube separately and mix well. Then, all test tubes will be incubated for 24 hours at 37oC to get active strains (Cavalieri et al., 2005). Table 3.2.4.3 shows the preparation of 0.5 McFarland Standard Turbidity and 0.85% saline solution
Table 3.2.4.3 Preparation of standard and saline solutions.
After lawn inoculating a Meuller Hinton plate and placing the samples of medication, the plate was then incubated for one week at 37 degrees Celsius. The first medication choice was Trimethoprim, this produced a zone of inhibition of 16mm, therefore being sensitive to the bacteria. Antibiotic number two was nalidixic acid, this too, has a zone of inhibition of 16mm but is considered intermediate. The next antibiotic was erythromycin which produced a zone of inhibition of zero and was therefore resistant. The last antibiotic that was chosen to be used in the experiment was ciprofloxacin.
Identification of bacteria within Unknown Culture #21 In this experiment, an unknown culture of two different types of bacteria was assigned to each person, a number of tests were performed to isolate and identify these bacterial cells. Based on knowledge from the previous experiments completed in lab, a basic understanding of each type of bacteria was used to create a flow chart that would aid the process of identifying the unknown bacteria within the culture. A gram stain that is performed initially will narrow down the types of tests certain bacteria will and will not respond to. In addition to the gram stain, some of the tests that were used include, a catalase test, an Eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar test, a bile esculin test, and a 6.5% sodium chloride (NaCl) test.
The purpose of this lab report is to employ a myriad of skills, tools and, methods learned throughout this semester to perform the appropriate tests for the identification of the assigned unknown bacteria. Add more background information here!!! The most important tools and techniques used during this identification include aseptic technique, microscopic examination and, the use of selective and differential media. Aseptic technique is an important tool for microbiologists. It is imperative that aseptic technique is maintained throughout the length of any test to avoid any cross-contamination that may lead to inaccurate results.
I expect to learn the biochemical differences in bacteria from this lab. Also, how to identify different species of bacteria. Material & Methods For the first day of the practical, an unknown specimen was provided
On the first negative control plate, there should have been no growth on the plate with agar and ampicillin and regular E. coli cells. On the negative control plate with just agar and E. coli cells there should have been growth but the colonies would not
The T-Streak method was also used to ensure that pure colonies were created. The results of the biomedical test concluded that the unknown bacteria number 16 was in fact E. aerogenes. Introduction Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria are similar but also
This time, we used minimal agar plate. The plate was labeled into two sections, Trsf and Mut. The Trsf colony on the LB plate was looped and spread on the Trsf section of the minimal agar plate and the Mut was done likewise. The plate was then incubated at 30℃ until the next course day. Only the wild-type Acinetobacter gene enables the bacteria to grow on minimal medium, therefore if growth was seen on the Trsf section then we would expect that the mutant had transformed and picked up DNA from its surroundings.
The tube was placed back in incubation for 96 more hours to observe any more positives. 2.10 Catalase Test A trypticase soy agar plate was used and after incubation, four drops of 3% Hydrogen Peroxide was added to the plate to flow over the bacterial growth. A presence of bubbling was observed. 2.11 Starch Hydrolysis
In the laboratory, identification of an unknown bacterium is often necessary. In the lab, a random sample consisting of three different bacteria was selected. The sample contained one gram-positive, one gram-negative paracolon, and one gram-negative coliform. The purpose of the experiment is to identify each of the three species that the mixture contained. After receiving an unknown mixture, the sample was streaked for isolation onto TSA, blood agar, and MacConkey plates.
The unknown bacteria was then tested on multiple selective and differential media. Growth was present on the MacConkey Agar and the colonies were the same color as the plate, which told me my bacteria was gram negative and did not ferment lactose. There was no growth on the Mannitol Salt Agar, and this told me the unknown was not salt tolerant and did not
7) Test tube four contains 7 mL of distilled water and 3 mL of CoCl2. The fifth had 7 mL of distilled water and 3 mL of CoCl2. 8) Test tube five contains 6 mL of distilled water and 4 mL of CoCl2. 9) Test tube six contains 5 mL of distilled water and 5 mL of CoCl2. 10) After all of the test tubes are prepared, they will be put into cuvettes.
The B. Vulgaris samples were approximately 1cm3. They were kept the same size to ensure accurate results. A control test was conducted in distilled water to obtain a result to compare. The ethanol treatments were 40% and 70%. To prepare the solutions a 70% ethanol solution was used to make 40%.
After 48 hours, I observed different growth patterns around the disks. I measured the zone of inhibition of each antibiotic and document them on Microbiology task 3
From the Unknown tube professor Cooper gave me, I scratched a little on the slant surface with the sterilized inoculating loop. Then I place it on a clean prepared slide which already had a slight drop of water. The two substances are mixed together in the middle of the slide and let dry completely. One extra step of “heat fix” is necessary to adhere everything to the surface of the slide. To start gram staining, I slightly pour crystal-violet all over the slide and let it sit for 30 seconds before wash it off with water.
The creation of the master plate was made up of specially selected bacteria from both experiment 3.2 and 4.1, the goal was to achieve a diverse selection of bacteria to observe closely at its texture, color, shaper, and margins. When selecting specific bacteria, I looked for the best combination of variation and choosing across all five of my plates for both agars. Through using morphological observation I was able to determine different bacteria such as colonies that are irregular and circular continuing with variations of elevations and edges. Also, the use of solid cultures such as the use of agar is rewarding because the bacteria will not move creating the ability to have many colonies on the plate while still being isolated and effectively