Bandwagon Fallacy: Proving The Existence Of God
WHY GOD EXISTS REBUTTAL (I KNOW, IT'S LONG)
First off let me say that I do not believe in religion and that heavily influences my opinion of your article. There are several problems with your whole argument, so let's go through paragraph by paragraph.
Your first paragraph states that 54% of the world's population believe in god, followed by a declaration of the existence of a god. This could be a form of a bandwagon fallacy depending on how you interpret it. A bandwagon fallacy is simply appealing to the popularity of something in order to verify it. As I said before, it depends on how you meant it, but it was worth mentioning nonetheless.
In your second paragraph, you say that scientists "still can not think of a way for life to have come into existence on Earth", therefore god. First off, this is simply not true, it is widely agreed that life began with single-celled prokaryotic cells because there is evidence to support it. The question is how those cells first originated. However, by saying we don't know, therefore god, you have
…show more content…
There is a whole paragraph where the scientist explains that "The model creates exoplanets based only on the ones we have discovered, which is an extremely small sample size". What this means is that the scientists have simply made a prediction based on very little data. And as we all know by watching the weather, predictions can be very wrong. Another thing in this paragraph, when you say, "what are the chances that of the 700 quintillion planets in the universe the Earth would be the only one to have life on it". This could be interpreted as a form of gambler's fallacy if we are assuming that the series of events required to create life on Earth is completely random. The gambler's fallacy states that in a random situation, assuming outcomes can be affected by past experiences. Again, if this is not what you meant in your journal then it is irrelevant, but it is still worth
The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks Summary
1500 Words | 6 PagesDespite the good that has come from the cells it does not take away from the fact that these
Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment
807 Words | 4 PagesFor the reason is that I am an atheist who relies on proven facts and critical thinking. In the text, the author wrote that “teaching each other stories that can be said to be false like the idea of God.” This proves that Kris Notaro (the author) also does not believe in religion. The main reason I have faith in critical thinking and the scientific method is that facts and evidence can verify them. Further, he also states, “Things can work completely out of tune, but can also work as intended”.
Darrel R Falk Chapter Summary
818 Words | 4 PagesFalk seems to be oblivious of the assumptions used in debates on origins, and of the difference between data and understandings of data. No one has a way to go back in time and study our history, so all ideas must be based upon assumptions. Those assumptions are the foundation of our worldview, which is our central belief about where the world came from and how it became what it is today. The Bible has many verses about the timing of creation and God’s hand in it. God spoke the Universe, heavens, Earth, life, and man into existence (Genesis 1; Psalm 33:6, 9; 148:5; John 1:1-3).
The Logical Fallacy Of Bandwagon In Middle School
192 Words | 1 PagesMiddle schoolers today are often using the logical fallacy of bandwagon in an attempt to pressure their parents into buying them a cell phone. As a student in middle school, I used the same claim of bandwagon in order to pressure my parents into purchasing a phone for me. Instead of stating logical reasons, I decided to suggest the fact that “all of my friends have phones,” so I should, too. My parents knew that was not a reasonable point, therefore, my claims would be denied every time. I would repeatedly try convincing my parents using bandwagon, however, the argument would never go my way.
Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument
1444 Words | 6 PagesThere have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.
Analysis Of The Cosmological Argument
305 Words | 2 PagesThe question that there is a need for a cause of God’s existence will always be scrutinized and debated as answers are sought out to prove existence and
Pascal's Waager Rhetorical Analysis
619 Words | 3 PagesAll in all, after examining the arguments that have been put forward against Pascal’s Wager, the wager fails to provide acceptable reasons as to why claiming to believe in God will be beneficial to those who are believing in God
Sacks 'Anybody Out There?'
703 Words | 3 PagesEvidence and theories shows that the production of life is incredibly delicate, lucky, unlikely, and rare. But to counter that argument, there is also the fact that there are billions of planets in a single galaxy, and billions of galaxies in the known universe, so the likeliness of life starting on another planet isn’t ruled out. 3. List and define some of the scientific evidence and scientific principles Sacks mentions in his essay.
Wager's Argument For The Existence Of God
378 Words | 2 PagesFor this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.
Arguing For The Existence Of God In Pascal's The Wager
358 Words | 2 PagesArguing for the existence of God from a philosophical perspective would need a more solidifying use of reason instead of evidence based logic. Because when trying to qualify your main thesis within an argument using evidence based logic and reasoning would aid in establishing credibility with your audience. So in Pascal's "The Wager" it utilizes argument theory of deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning or theory is similar to cause and effect inference, an example could be if you drop a ball it will hit the ground. However deductive theory validates the end result through the consequence of the action.
Analysis Of Victor's Imagination In Frankenstein
974 Words | 4 Pages“Scientist: 'We Didn't Create Life from Scratch'.” CNN, Cable News Network, 21 May 2010,
Inductive And Cosmological Argument Analysis
548 Words | 3 PagesOf the four categories of argument for the existence of God, the inductive and the cosmological arguments are the most persuasive. These arguments are effective because they utilize reason based on psychological patterns and scientific principles. Undeniable psychological patterns have been recorded to exist amongst the human race, and with these patterns, arguments can be made from a psychological viewpoint. One such argument is the beneficial effects of religious belief on people. Why would believing in a higher power create a positive effect on people if there was not any truth behind the belief?
Darwin's Doubt Summary
1777 Words | 8 PagesThe blind watch maker analogy that was presented is brilliant. Creationists, use their own version of the watchmaker argument saying if you were walking down a beach and you found a watch you could assume there was a designer. But when it comes to talking about existence, physical reality, and life, It’s a little different. The analogy at first glance seems to work but then you realize that even metaphorically speaking it’s an equivocation fallacy.
Inductivism Vs Falsification Theory
1172 Words | 5 PagesI strongly believe that an approach based on a theorem which is applied to gambling has no place in science and experiments cannot be theory
Pascal Wenger's Argument For The Existence Of God
822 Words | 4 PagesAccording to a philosopher, Pascal Wenger, one 's belief about God existing is based on self-interest. He argues that it is in our interest to believe that God exists and hence from his point of view it is rational for us human beings to do so. Furthermore, he adds that if we believe in God 's existence and he truly exists then, we are bound to receive a reward in heaven but if he doesn 't exist we won 't have lost a thing. Finally, he concludes those who do not believe in God 's existence; then he exists they are bound to receive an endless penalty in heaven. Also, other arguments about the existence of God include the ontological perspective which tries to argue from the point of abstract reasoning.
More about Bandwagon Fallacy: Proving The Existence Of God
The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks Summary
1500 Words | 6 PagesNt1310 Unit 1 Assignment
807 Words | 4 PagesDarrel R Falk Chapter Summary
818 Words | 4 PagesThe Logical Fallacy Of Bandwagon In Middle School
192 Words | 1 PagesCosmological Vs Ontological Argument
1444 Words | 6 PagesAnalysis Of The Cosmological Argument
305 Words | 2 PagesPascal's Waager Rhetorical Analysis
619 Words | 3 PagesSacks 'Anybody Out There?'
703 Words | 3 PagesWager's Argument For The Existence Of God
378 Words | 2 PagesArguing For The Existence Of God In Pascal's The Wager
358 Words | 2 PagesAnalysis Of Victor's Imagination In Frankenstein
974 Words | 4 PagesInductive And Cosmological Argument Analysis
548 Words | 3 PagesDarwin's Doubt Summary
1777 Words | 8 PagesInductivism Vs Falsification Theory
1172 Words | 5 PagesPascal Wenger's Argument For The Existence Of God
822 Words | 4 Pages