Everyone is miserable in a dystopia but, everyone in a utopia is happy. In a dystopia the people are you usually abused by their government. In a utopia the people are usually treated fairly and nicely. Although, many people believe war defines utopia and peace defines utopia, in reality bad government actions define a dystopia and knowledge defines a utopia. You can see this in any type of literature. In a utopia, everybody should have access to any type of literature, no matter what it says. This is shown in the article, “Banned Books Week: Celebrating the Freedom to Read.” “BBW stresses the importance of ensuring the availability of unorthodox or unpopular viewpoints for all who wish to read and access them.” (Unknown author pg. 115) This
The literary works of “Harrison Bergeron”by Kurt Vonnegut, and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury are satirical portrayals of egalitarian societies that are censored in order to create a faux sense of order . The Prospect of promoting sameness and conformity among all people, and the effects of the forced elimination of citizens’ individuality in order to maintain order is challenged in both societies. In Fahrenheit 451 the possession of books is considered a crime . They believe all members of this community should be equally intelligent, and remain content without learning or exploring the further knowledge offered by reading books.
Utopias are not good for everyone. Everyone likes different things, which means Utopias are only good for one person. One person might like one thing, but someone else might think differently. In a Utopia people are forced into doing something they do not want to do. Everyone likes different things.
Man Can Never Be Equal “Life is about family and technology” (Mark Goddard). This quote was chosen because family and technology both play a vital part in both stories Anthem and Harrison Bergeron. A dystopia is the opposite of a utopia and is usually characterized by a totalitarian society. Totalitarian society is a society in which nearly every aspect of public and private behavior is regulated by the state.
One of the key principles that make the country great is our freedom to say, write, and read whatever we want. Despite this, countless public figures and schools have chosen to restrict access to certain books, whether it’s in order to protect political correctness or explicit sexual content and violence. Rarely do these people stop and consider the dire effects book banning might have on both students and society as a whole. An author does not write because they are looking to offend someone, they right because they have a story to share. The First Amendment of the Constitution not only works to protect this right to the fullest extent possible, but also serves to protect the rights of the people that choose to be offended by these stories.
I will not banned books because each book has a purpose. I wouldn’t banned these books because it would be like taking away some knowledge from the kids. You cant take history away just because of the violence. For example if they banned religious books because its against another religion it wouldn’t be right. People wont know what happened in history if we banned them.
Banned Books Censorship is the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, or other that is considered obscene. Censorship was used back in the 1800s with fascist states. Like censorship, book banning is the prohibition from a book being published and circulated by a government authority. The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls is a novel that has been challenged and banned. The Glass Castle is about a girl named Jeannette growing up with a mentally ill mother and a drunk father.
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Pat Conroy, a man with many years and much knowledge, is an author of many novels and writings. It is the year 2007, Mr. Conroy is writing a letter to the editor of the Charleston Gazette, about why the banning of his books is depriving students of the real world knowledge they enclose, while also setting back the teachers from teaching to their fullest ability. He is not the happiest man in the world as he replies, his work showing how he feels. Conroy uses powerful statements along with personal examples and metaphors to establish his message within the text.
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.
Books contain profanity that children cannot and might not be able to handle. Profanity: blasphemous or obscene language. Banning books violates our 1st amendment, but some books contain graphic materials such as sexual content and various types of profanity that explains why books should be banned. Sexual content is one thing that should make the banning books topic way more in depth than it is. The use of sexual content in books might make children ask their parents or even teachers and friends that question which is what is sex?
Books, Should We Ban Them Or Not: Banned books are books that have been taken out of public environments because of many different reasons. Books should not be banned simply because we have the rights to any books. Banned Books can teach important things about our history. Books that have been banned teach great morals/lesson even with the negative content. Banning Books infringes on people 's personal rights.
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.
A society where books are burned and reading is banned, seems like a far off dystopian land, but it's happening in America, and it's happening now. Books such as Ray Bradbury's ""Fahrenheit 451"" are being banned daily. The book, ironically, is about a fireman who runs away from society because he refuses to burn books and submit to a life without meaning. Although "Fahrenheit 451" brings up issues pertaining to controversial beliefs, it should not be banned because of it's educational value. By reading this book students are exposed to life lessons and experiences all within the confines of a book.
But in a dystopia, these things are taken away from the people. When comparing the dystopia to our life, it shows that freedom and being in control of your own life is what separates a dystopia from a utopia. Another example of a dystopian government controlling the people is during the tests that everyone has to take to determine their faction, the people are not allowed to share their results, even if they are positive. Tris isn 't even allowed to share with her
Many books have been banned through out the years or in the process of being banned. For instance The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R Tolkien was banned. This book was about the upcoming of the civilization rest in the fate of the one ring, which has been lost for a long time. Strong forces are ruthless in their search for it. The fate has placed it in the hands of a young hobbit named Frodo Baggins, who inherits the ring and steps into legend.