The last reason banning books is a problem around the world is how it isn't hurting anyone unless they read it and it's those that aren't such a big fan of them. Books should not be banned just because a few others don't like them. Around the world it makes so many upset that libraries are doing that. It isn't fair that others can't read what they enjoy without books being banned. It could be a problem if younger children are reading them, and it has sexual talked, cursed words, but, they could do something about it with under age
Elie Wiesel’s Night should not be banned from the book list for ninth grade because it is a book that teaches very important lessons despite the fact that it contains violent scenes. The book shows that we should treat people in a good way even if they are not like us. It reveals the horrible consequences of inhumanity, the meaningless suffering and unbearable pain of innocent people. These reasons show that the book is very important for the grown-ups because it deals with fundamental questions about humanity and moral values. This book should not be banned even though it portrays so many violent moments because it shows us the horrible reality of racial prejudice and discrimination.
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
Would you want anyone to ban books so you couldn’t further your education? School Board members should not ban certain books because students can get more of a challenge from certain books, you also can get many life lessons from a more mature book, and students also get more of a choice which means more books to read. One reason I believe school board members should not ban books is because it gives students more of a challenge. For example, teachers like to challenge kids to read above their grade level and reading more mature books will get them there. However, how will they get assigned harder or more challenging books if those kinds of books are banned from the school library.
MIS Book Council Midtown International School should not create a book advisory council. Censoring books can create a bad vibe that can lead to drugs and pornography. Press is also being limited about serious topics that could save lives. The book advisory council would counteract the constitutions first amendment. Finally if you don 't tell the kids what is happening in the bad things somewhere in the world then they will not understand right from wrong.
As long as former child soldiers show that they will not recommit their acts of violence, they should be granted amnesty. Child soldiers are often forced into being violent. They shouldn’t be held responsible for things that they were essentially forced to do. Although there is plenty of evidence showing that child soldiers should be given amnesty, some may argue the opposite. People may say that they could sacrifice their own lives instead of killing others, but that is too much to expect of kids.
By banning books the school board is controlling how and/or what students think about a variety of subjects. As ruled in the Island Trees School District v. Pico Case, “’…students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate’” (Mullally). School official “cannot suppress ‘expressions of feeling with which they do not wish to contend’” (Mullally). This means that the schools cannot remove a book simply because they disagree with something contained in it. Then how are books banned?
On the issue of banning books, it seems that the parents know the right things and others do not. In reality every book read in a high school, a parent is always going to state why the child should not read such and such a book. It 's simply opinionated. I believe that if a book has some good moral or is taught in a manner that projects good morality then it should be allowed to be part of the school 's
(Tal Yellin, 1)This sets an absolutely horrible precedent for the education of the American student; why is more effort being put into imprisoning, not even helping, someone than teaching a child to learn new skills that could help them stay off a track of drug use? Some argue that rehabilitation, especially forced rehabilitation, does not stop a drug user from continuing to use drugs or committing other drug related crimes. This is shown to be untrue as scientific research shows that both mandated and voluntary rehabilitation helps people change their attitudes and behaviors so that they will avoid relapse. It also helps them remove themselves from a life of crime and can cut drug use in half and help avoid criminal activity in the future. (National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1) Not only does rehabilitation help out the previously addicted people involved, it also boosts the economy along the way.
Some people want to put pressure and stress on kids because it will “help” them, but that’s not good for the kids and their health. It can also sometimes change them into a bad person, which would not lead to a bright future for them. Conversely, there’s people that think thats letter grades shouldn’t be removed to help students learn and help them in the future and help the future generation help would make the world a better place and that there are other people that think the same about this because it helps kids learn and they don’t feel failure anymore because who wants their children to feel that their whole life which isn’t good to feel your whole life so in conclusion we should get rid of letter