The Transition of Civility
In today’s commercial age, many of us have experienced awkwardness in the conversations with service workers. In “The Civility Glut”, Barbara Ehrenreich addresses the issue of excessive formality and politeness within day to day communications in America. She begins with examples of the so called “civility glut” in the popular media and her personal life, then gives background information explaining why this is happening. Her transition in rhetorical approach from comedic narrative to thoughtful definition has played an important role in directing reader’s attention and opinion.
From the very start in the essay’s thesis, Ehrenreich uses the image of “chin-strokers” and “morality-mavens” to describe her opposition to the pretentious, lowering self-proclaimed experts who suggest that more formality is necessary (Ehrenreich par. 1). These negative visual metaphors make the reputation of the opposite argument less appealing to the general audience and thus strengthening her point. Also in the first paragraph, the colloquial language in the essay was established
…show more content…
7). She guides the reader through her train of thought, attempting to make logical assumptions on the meaning of her zip codes or account number, which are sarcastic. This method of deductive conclusion not only appeals to logos through logic, but further create some humour, keeping the audience involved and sympathetic to the issue. She also recalls the joke “Don’t tell me what kind of day to have!” and parodies a hostile farewell from Romeo and Juliet to “Have a great day, Romeo!” in order to demonstrate situations of unnecessary politeness. This way, the audience can reflect on their own experiences with the issue and feel uncomfortable without the author having to list the
In the selection, “Serving in Florida”, Barbara Ehrenreich described her experience of working at the low-wage American workplace and the worker’s struggles with minimum wage. When she depicts the work as an outsider, she states “customers arrive in human waves, sometimes disgorged fifty at a time from their tour buses, peckish and whiny.” (Ehrenreich 395) It demonstrates the hardships of the workers when dealing with customers. Even though the customers are complaining for no reasons and being obnoxious, the workers have to deal with them with respect.
Before this point Diehl relied heavily on pathos to convince his audience but this specific appeal to logos lacks substantive proof. He continues by specifying what a $40,000 talk would have contained. He points out that the talk has no lasting power or impression. However, in this, Diehl fails to leave the audience with a call to action or explanation of what should come next. He instructs his audience to ask if Nye was worth it but does not offer suggestions to improve future speakers, offer information on how to change the budget, or how to get rid of the Speaker Series in general.
All in all, Oyler successfully integrates a wide variety of rhetorical arguments and strategies for her opinion to persuade her audience by appealing to their logic, emotion and ethics. Importantly, Oyler efficiently uses a variety of rhetorical strategies under the lens of logos(logic) to critically examine the importance of the semicolon, primarily through using a rational chain of logic and mentions of relevant literary experts. Likewise, in her pursuit of a persuasive logical rhetorical strategy, Oyler frequently engages in efficient critical thinking throughout her article. For example, in the last paragraph of her article, Oyler makes use of critical reasoning in an attempt to persuade those in her literary audience who remain skeptical of the use of the semicolon in spite of her previous arguments, she states “the semicolon conveys a very specific kind of connection between ideas that is particularly useful now – it asserts a link where the reader might no necessarily see one while
She asks, “Would Cicero have shone so distinguished an orator if he had not been roused, kindled, and inflamed by the tyranny of Catiline, Verres, and Mark Anthony?” Although the answer to this rhetorical question is obvious, it solidifies an important point in the mind of the reader: experience comes from challenges and difficult times. Making an allusion to an important historical figure and using him as an example will draw a connection in John Quincy Adams’ mind and add emphasis to her message. She follows up her rhetorical question with sentences that – albeit not answering the question directly – add more emphasis to her point, such as, “The habits of a vigorous mind are formed in contending with difficulties. All history will convince you of this, and that wisdom and penetration are the fruit of experience, not the lessons of retirement and leisure.”
Ellison’s use of complex diction to depict how the society in which Everett C. Marm lives in is deficient and causes him to create his Harlequin persona helps to develop the Harlequin as a man of moral conscience. The Harlequin was allowed to be created in the world because “the very world it was, […] had no way to predict he would happen—possibly a strain of disease long-defunct, now, suddenly, reborn in a system where immunity had been forgotten, had lapsed—he had been allowed to become to real” (1). The Harlequin was created by the system within the society. The very own society which he lived in, created him as a cry for help to all the citizens being oppressed in their humdrum society.
This allows the audience to know that she can relate to the situation. Most everyone texts and it can be easy to allow such language to bleed over into any type of formal writing. She, however, believes that people have enough common sense and control and that most people don't allow themselves to use such language in their final drafts of their formal writings. Despite establishing her credibility and strong use of logos, she does, however, lack in pathos. She fails at truly connecting with the reader on a more personal and emotional level.
Using ethos she discusses the example of how if you were forced to hold a pen in your teeth to smile after a while it would make the person feel happy. This leads into her use of logos where she suggests that if this is true then if we were to fake being powerful eventually this would make the person feel actually powerful. These ideas lead into more detail when further
The emotional appeal is furthered during later parts of the article. For instance, McWhortor proves word have connotation through the use of anecdotal and somewhat historical evidence when he uses direct examples of controversial
It is OK to admit that” (3). Her unprofessional use of rhetoric is not exclusive to this example — a plethora of instances are riddled throughout her article. Moreover, her use of rude and rhetorical language is childish, certainly not a characteristic of civil discourse. There is a clear distinction to be made between professional and unprofessional dialogue, especially at this level. The former lends credibility and legitimacy to the author while the
In Tony Mirabelli’s writing, “Learning to Serve”, Mirabelli completes an ethnographic study of the service industry. Mirabelli writes on a topic he is quite familiar with, being a waiter. Mirabelli discusses the complexity of being a waiter, although most of these complexities are unknown to people outside of the discourse community. Mirabelli uses his ethnographic study to undermine criticism towards waiters. The main critique Mirabelli rebuts in his writing is that being a waiter does not require skill.
Rebecca Skloot uses rhetorical devices throughout the book such as; logos, ethos, and pathos to appeal to the audience and help spread public awareness of this
In addition to being one of the most entertaining shows to binge in the background of daily life, The Office is considered to be one of the more quotable comedies the 2000s brought us. The show’s compilation of lovable and often stereotypical characters provided us with nine seasons worth of memorable tomfoolery, character development, and one-liners. But for the purpose of this paper we will be looking beyond the plethora of “Worlds Best Boss” mugs and “That’s what she said” jokes, and taking a cold, analytical look at The Office to determine what the show offers in regard to interpersonal communication. In the first episode we are introduced to the shows connotation of conflict as we observe Dwight Schrute demonstrating a competitive conflict style in his reaction to Jim Halpert’s solidifying Dwight’s personal belongings in a jello mold.
In order to make her audience keep interests in her speech, she also uses rhetorical device - irony. Where she mentioned in the sixth paragraph that the survey which is made by National Association of employees in 2001, shows 38 percent of the employers complained the schools inadequately taught reading comprehension. While the concern and the curiosity raised among readers, this persuasive technique have effectively enhances the power of Gioia arguments that her audiences will agree to take her side. Along with strong logos appeals, writer also effectively makes the allusion
The author mentioned popular media people (like Rita Moreno) and literary characters (“Mammy” from Gone with the Wind) to show the source and the deepness of stereotypes. She includes dialogues and description of own ruefulness during the current event to create more emotion-oriented essay. Several main issues and single words are highlighted with the aid of italics, like the word ripen (Cofer 4) that showed boy’s expectances to Cofer’s sexual behavior. Was it author’s choice or not, the decision helps readers to see an important topic.
She explained that this function helps reduce the social distance and is also a face protecting device of the speaker as well as the addressee. It is the type of the positive effect including the positive and negative politeness. Looking at the following example, the speaker is a woman Ellen Pompeo who is talking about her spoilers as the proof for that: ED: The fact that you even have them ahead of time EP: