Barbara Grutter Case Summary
Procedural history. Barbara Grutter (Plaintiff), a white resident from the state of Michigan, was denied admission to the University of Michigan Law School (Defendant). She sued the Law School in a federal district court, and alleged racial discrimination against her in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment on the basis of the Defendant’s consideration of race as a key factor in the school’s admissions process. The district court upheld the Plaintiff’s claim. The court of appeals reversed.
Facts. The Law School from the University of Michigan intended to achieve diversity in their student body by evaluating each applicant based on an application that includes: GPA scores, LSAT scores, letters of recommendation, student’s personal essay, among
Mississippi University For Women Case Study
730 Words | 3 PagesThe fourteenth amendment states in the equal protection clause that states may not discriminate against any citizen for any reason, and must allow the same privileges, rights, and conservation. Hogan was on a mission to gain relief as well as compensation for the damages caused. The case was argued on March 22, 1982. The argument from Joe Hogan was proposed by advocate, Wilbur Colom. The petitioner’s side was presented by Hunter M. Gholson, in representation for Mississippi University for Women.
Case Study: Grutter V. Bollinger
379 Words | 2 PagesThough in Grutter v. Bollinger we deal with the 14th amendment of the Equal Protection Clause and racial classifications too, the way race is used is slightly differs. In this particular case, the court had to decide whether the use of race at the Univeristy of Michigan Law School during the admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment. Barbara Grutter, a Caucasian applicant, applied to the University of Michigan in 1996 with a 3.8 GPA and a score of 161 on her LSAT. Grutter was placed on the waitlist, but was subsequently denied admission to the school. Grutter claims that she was only denied because of her race, as the University uses race as a factor in the admission process.
Summary Of Batson Vs Kentucky
560 Words | 3 PagesIn this case, the prosecution used peremptory challenge to dismiss all of the black jurors. Batson claimed that the prosecutions use of a peremptory challenge violated the constitutions Equal Protection Clause (Findlaw | Cases and Codes, n.d.). The request was denied because Batson failed to show a pattern to which all of the black jurors were dismissed. The court established a standard for this case that a petitioner had to prove racial exclusion for discriminatory
Gregory G. Garre Esq's Oral Argument
182 Words | 1 PagesFisher v. University of Texas at Austin, No.14-981. Transcript of Gregory G. Garre Esq’s oral argument on behalf of the Respondent. Pg.51, lines 10-13, & Pg.55, lines 7-9: Back in 2002, from a class of 8,000, there were only 272 black students enrolled; 90% of the time, it is typical for a normal size classroom of to have zero to one African American student. Id. General Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. agrees that in the event of two applicants’ criteria are exact alike, their race factors does “not necessary” matter in the admission office’s decision making. “The increasingly fierce competition for the decreasing number of seats available for Texas students outside the top 10% rule results in minority students being under-represented, and
Mclaurin V. Oklahoma State Regents Case Study
242 Words | 1 PagesIn 1950, in the Sweatt v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents cases, the Court struck down segregation of African American students in law and graduate schools. The Justice Department, in its brief to the Court, said it believed Plessy was unconstitutional and should be overturned. NAACP Legal Defense Fund lawyers, led by Thurgood Marshall, began to devise a strategy that would force the Court to re-examine the constitutionality of the separate-but-equal doctrine (2015 The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights/The Leadership Conference Education Fund). Thomas Madison had every right to go that college, he met every schoo. 1978:
Abigail Fisher Case Study
927 Words | 4 PagesIn the court case Grutter v. Bollinger, it was ruled that that race had an appropriate but limited role in the admissions policies of public universities. Both Fisher and Michalewicz believed that the school was selecting more people that where of color over equally as eligible whites due to this court case. Fisher decided to bring this
Plessy Vs. Ferguson Case In The 19th Century
1106 Words | 5 PagesThe famous Plessy vs. Ferguson case is a symbol of American intolerance and oppression because the “separate but equal” principle created a benchmark for racial segregation but American democracy and progress is illustrated in women’s desire for equal opportunity when Bradwell applied to be a lawyer in the case Bradwell vs
The Case Of West Central Dixie State University V. The Sons Of The Confederacy
2066 Words | 9 PagesBecause there are two cases involved, there are two different legal questions that we must answer. First, we were to answer whether The Asian Society’s and its members Equal Protection rights were abridged upon by them being denied the benefits of the other minorities that attend West Central Dixie State University. Secondly, we were to answer the question brought to the court by The Sons of the Confederacy: Is the policy of positive segregation implemented by the university unconstitutional based on the rights guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment, specifically the Equal Protection clause. We agree with the lower Court’s ruling in the case of The Asian Society that the policy itself it not unconstitutional, but that it does violate the Fourteenth Amendment because the compelling interest of the university is not narrowly-tailored enough. It should include all minorities not just some for the policy of positive segregation to fulfill its purpose of multiculturalism and diversity.
Lum V. Rice Case Study
1170 Words | 5 PagesMarina Vinnichenko Term Paper: Court Case Gong Lum v. Rice Gong Lum v. Rice (1927) stands out as the case within which the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly extended the pernicious doctrine of “separate but equal”. In this case the issue was whether the state of Mississippi was required to provide a Chinese citizen equal protection of the law under the Fourteenth Amendment when he was taxed to pay for public education but was forced to send his daughter to a school for children of color. Mаrtha Lum, the child of the plаintiff of the case, was a citizen of the United States аnd a child of immigrants from China. She enrolled in and аttended the local public consolidated high school at the age of 9, but was told midway through her first day that
Green V. New Kent County School
628 Words | 3 PagesThesis Green v. New Kent County was an important court case from 1968 dealing with desegregation in schools. Calvin Green convinced the court to establish the laws from Brown v. Board of Ed into action, giving better opportunities to all students of all races. Background Charles C. Green attended George W. Watkins school during Green v. New Kent. Schools across Virginia didn’t acknowledge the rules set in Brown, two of them being George W. Watkins for black students and New Kent for whites.
The Case Of Abigail Fisher V. University Of Texas
1052 Words | 5 PagesFisher v. University of Texas was a case that formed in 2008. Abigail Fisher claimed that she was rejected from The University of Texas because she was white. The case seemed to have caught attention from around the U.S. The case soon made its way to the Supreme Court. Here’s why.
Supreme Court Case Study: Fisher V. Texas
858 Words | 4 PagesThe Supreme Court made a mistake when they decided with the University of Texas; no college should take in race as a factor when selecting applications of students. In 2007, two female high school students applied to the University of Texas; one of the girls being Miss Abigail N. Fisher. Abigail was a caucasian, in the top 12% of her school at Stephen Austin High School, but she was denied by the University of Texas along with a friend of her’s. However,
Brown V Board Of Education Outline
483 Words | 2 PagesTitle: Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka Thesis: The Oliver Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka case not only allowed integration in schools but it influenced the constitution towards equal protection and catalyzed future desegregation. I. Introduction: a. Description: Oliver Brown argued that although schooling was provided, it wasn’t equal because it was violating the 14th amendment to the United States Constitution. b. Thesis: The Oliver Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka case not only allowed integration in schools but it influenced the constitution towards equal protection and catalyzed future desegregation. II.
The Fourteenth Amendment
1486 Words | 6 PagesFor example, in Ritchie v. People (1895), the Illinois Supreme Court rejected the eight-hour provision from the Law of 1893, because it violated the Fourteenth Amendment by depriving women of freedom of contract, which is derived from the due process clause (A14.1). The decision rooted from the larger political battle occuring at the time- most wealthy businesses and political leaders did not support protective laws - which led to a display of false paternity/equality by the justices. In dismay, Florence Kelley rejected that the Fourteenth Amendment could be used in such a manner, and said, “The measure to guarantee the Negro freedom from oppression has become an insuperable obstacle to the protection of women and children” (W15). In the campaign for protective rights for laborers, the ruling from Ritchie v. People marked a defeat, but not an end. In 1908, Kelley, and the NCL, sought redemption through the case of Muller v. Oregon (case description), and picked an attorney, Louis Brandeis, who “seemed like a champion to fight her battle in court” (W26).
The Case Of Students For Fair Admissions V. University Of North Carolina
2018 Words | 9 PagesIntroduction The case of Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court, and centers on the University of North Carolina's use of race in its admissions policies. The petitioner, Students for Fair Admissions, have brought claims alleging that the university's use of race discriminates against Asian American applicants in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and federal civil rights statutes, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The legal issues before the Supreme Court include whether the university's use of race in admissions decisions is constitutional under the Equal Protection Clause, whether the university has a compelling interest
More about Barbara Grutter Case Summary
Mississippi University For Women Case Study
730 Words | 3 PagesCase Study: Grutter V. Bollinger
379 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Batson Vs Kentucky
560 Words | 3 PagesGregory G. Garre Esq's Oral Argument
182 Words | 1 PagesMclaurin V. Oklahoma State Regents Case Study
242 Words | 1 PagesAbigail Fisher Case Study
927 Words | 4 PagesPlessy Vs. Ferguson Case In The 19th Century
1106 Words | 5 PagesThe Case Of West Central Dixie State University V. The Sons Of The Confederacy
2066 Words | 9 PagesLum V. Rice Case Study
1170 Words | 5 PagesGreen V. New Kent County School
628 Words | 3 PagesThe Case Of Abigail Fisher V. University Of Texas
1052 Words | 5 PagesSupreme Court Case Study: Fisher V. Texas
858 Words | 4 PagesBrown V Board Of Education Outline
483 Words | 2 PagesThe Fourteenth Amendment
1486 Words | 6 PagesThe Case Of Students For Fair Admissions V. University Of North Carolina
2018 Words | 9 Pages