Choosing Your Consequences
In life we are lead through many decisions, we’re constantly making them, regretting them, and just expressing our free will. When we read stories about personal experiences we should always stop to wonder how the decisions the character makes affects them. Bartleby, Wakefield and Thoreau all seems to make the decision to use their free will but soon realize that when we express free will, there will always be consequences. In the short story “Bartleby the Scrivener” by Herman Melville , the main character Bartleby “prefers not to” work at a dead end job and ends up dying out of starvation. In Nathaniel Hawthorne 's “Wakefield” the main character chooses to temporarily leave his marriage for twenty years and ends
…show more content…
In the story we are introduced to an odd character by the name of Bartleby, a scrivener who at “At first Bartleby did an extraordinary quantity of writing” ( Melville 11) and proceeded to write “silently, palely, mechanically.” (Melville 11). But this soon turned around when Bartleby decided to turn in the opposite direction, when he was given orders “Bartleby in a singularly mild, firm voice, replied “I would prefer not to” ( Melville 11). He seems to be committed to the idea of “preferring” not to do something, and he would respond this every time and seems to have given up on his job. This ultimately makes the lawyer say “you are decided then, not to comply with my request-a request made according to common usage and common sense?” ( Melville 13) Bartleby uses his free will to an extreme, though he never explains the reason for his stance, we can assume it is because he was sick of the work he was doing and found it to be pointless. Soon enough we find out that Bartleby found life to be pointless and then came the consequences of the decision he …show more content…
Prefer not to do your job? Move to the woods and experience life in its elements? Leave your marriage for 20 years? Whatever it may be, we still face the consequences, whether it be death, disconnecting from society or that come with every decision we make. All these characters choose these consequences and evaluated the risks, and some turned out to be for the better or for the worse. Through Bartleby we learn how free will can be taken to an extreme, from Wakefield we learn about family commitment and freedom, and from Thoreau we learn to live life free and
McCandless had some controversial ideals and flaws, but the lessons and inspiration he left behind cannot be denied. His unwavering commitment to his ideals is a testament to his inspiring mindset. The unique life he led serves as an inspiration to many but also as a reminder of the importance of considering the impact of one’s actions on others. Everyone can learn a great deal from McCandless’ life and should strive to live with a similar goal: To pursue a life with the freedom to be one’s true self. Works Cited Krakauer, Jon.
The words of many authors, poets, and songwriters can influence certain aspects of a person’s life. One may simply admire the work because of the inspiration or beauty behind the piece, but others take the words to heart and live their lives by it. A fan of many transcendentalism authors Chris McCandless wanted to live his life with the same simplicity they did. After finding the inspiration in the works of Jack London and Henry David Thoreau McCandless ventured out into a two-year-long journey to find happiness in the Alaskan Wilderness. McCandless had the bravery to follow his own dream and was willing to risk his life for true happiness.
From great risk, some fortunate few are able to reap the benefits. The title character of Edith Wharton’s “Ethan Frome” often toys with this notion but reaches an inability to act. With nothing risked there is nothing gained, effectively preventing his life from moving forward or backwards. Furthermore, risk does not always yield change, as sometimes the change is the risk, a deviation from the normality of one’s life. Ethan’s inability to take risks keeps his life stagnant, immune to change like a decomposed corps in a grave.
Imagine being judged for the choices you make. In The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Glass Castle by Jeannette Walls and The Raisin In The Sun by Lorraine Hansberry the characters in these three novels search for independence under unfortunate circumstances. This results in difficult decision making situations that they are later judged for. However, Hester confronts her sin, the Younger family moves into a white neighborhood house and the Wall’s kids move away from their abusive parents.
Because of this his life and journey was not only something to criticize but something to both admire and celebrate. While others who came before him, like author Henry David Thoreau sought to live similar lifestyles, none truly took advantage of their life the way he was able to. As a young boy he idolized men like Thoreau and of Mccandless’s greatest successes was having not only lived up to these men, but in fact surpassed them in their journeys and experiences. Unlike Thoreau, Mccandless devoted the entirety of his life to both helping those in need and living what he believed to be life to the fullest for the ENTIRETY of it. Thoreau spent a short limited time in a cabin that was less than 2 miles outside of the nearest town, his charitable contributions are nothing noteworthy, and he is never recorded as benefiting the lives of nearly anyone close to him.
Although sacrifices can impact a person’s outcome in life, some characters sacrifice the people they love, some people sacrifice their community’s
In the Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck is saying that power has a direct effect on how people live their lives. Throughout the character’s actions and the symbolism in the intercalary chapters, Steinbeck shows us that the wrong kind of power will cause a negative affect how people live. An example of how Steinbeck’s writings talks about the negative effect of power would be the mentioning of banks throughout the story. In a quote he says “The Bank—or the Company— needs—wants—insists—must have—as though the Bank or the Company were a monster, with thought and feeling, which had ensnared them.
The reader gets to join McCandless in his adventure across the country as he invents a new life for himself. He embraces the ideas and morals of Thoreau and Emerson in his journey. In the book, a man by the man by the name of Westerberg discusses about how McCandless is not destroying his possessions and journey around the wild because the wild he is suicidal or unintelligent. “You could tell right away that Alex was intelligent… He always had to know the absolute right answer before he could go on to the next thing.”
Inhyeok (Daniel) Lee Mr. Soldi CP English III October 17, 2014 Bloodthirsty Revenge portrayed through Roger Chillingworth In his novel Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne utilizes several allegories throughout the story. Allegory is a literary technique that Hawthorne uses to connect the characters with symbolic presences. It gradually builds up the tension between characters, and also arouses curiosity of readers.
We get to see how his home life impacted his decisions later in life. By learning parts of his story, we can piece together McCandless’ values. McCandless admired a few people, and obtained his values through others. One of the ideas Christopher McCandless values the most is his independence. He didn’t let anyone tell him what he could and
“Adversity has the effect of eliciting talents which in prosperous circumstances would have lain dormant” (Horace). The idea that hard times elicit the development of certain aspects of a character, whether good or bad, is prevalent in literature, particularly The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne and The Crucible by Arthur Miller. Horace’s assertion is true in regard to the two texts in that they both contain characters who develop maturity and mercy, a new self-awareness, and cunning duplicity. The notion that adversity develops talents is shown in the characters of The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter who matured and developed an ability to forgive over the course of the plot.
This conveys to the reader that material possessions enslave us by means of understanding that life should revolve around inner fulfillment and that this experiment involved Thoreau testing out this idea rather than assuming that his expectations would be correct. He also simply desired to choose his path of life independently and
The phrase "prefer not to" recurs throughout the story and its repitition drives Bartleby colleagues to combative fury. In their simplicity and politeness the words : I prefer not to" and the very "prefer" most notably achieve a significance within the narrative. Also using the word "would" suggesting that there might be a choice in the matter. The expression of politeness is an illusion for Bartleby blantantly refusing to so anything asked of him. Like the semblance of choice in response "prefer" is both illusive and allusive the aowrd alludes to do a denying choice.
The Narrator justifies keeping Bartleby and ignores his internal issues with confrontation. When Bartleby refuses to do anything but copy the Narrator forgives the behavior because Bartleby asked so politely. When Bartleby refuses to work all together the Narrator allows him to stay because he thinks it is a good thing to help Bartleby. Even when the Narrator realizes the he can’t have Bartleby in his office anymore he moves offices instead of making Bartleby leave. All these acts show us that the Narrator does not know how do deal with confrontation
What does it mean to be human? And what does it mean to be a “free” in the human sense of the word? Herman Melville describes both in his story about what it is to be Bartleby and also what it is to work and employ a human who does not act as such. While re-reading this story, I found myself going through a spate of emotions including confusion about Bartleby’s non-compliance and his “preference” to not do things asked of him, amusement about this peculiarity, frustration about his insubordination which eventually turns to anger, but mostly sadness about his choice to not use those talents so freely given to him by G-d. This to me is what being “human” and “free” is