Q. Explain how the significance of the Battle of Long Tan and how the Australians won.
The Battle of Long Tan, which took place on 18th August 1966, was a highly symbolic battle for not only the Australian troops and as a country, but also for the Viet-Cong and the communists trying to take over Vietnam. Due to the fact of an outnumbered Australian troop force, this battle seemed to be nearly impossible to come out on top off, where roughly Two Thousand to Three Thousand Vietnamese troops, against a force of 108 Australian troops. Under normal circumstance, it could be expected that such an unequal battle might have gone against the Australians, yet research by many seems to indicate that the training of the Australians kept their spirits
…show more content…
With the circumstances of this battle being under, where 108 troops of D-Coy were doing patrolling duties, stumbling upon a Viet-Cong tunnel system. Moreover, the Australian troops were found themselves in a rough gun fight in the middle of a rubber plantation. As part of the Australians success in Long Tan was the use of artillery, mainly supplied by a special artillery force, covering for the gunmen in close-fire. In the tough times when back-up and ammunition was desperately needed, soldiers had to rely on one another to keep their hopes up high. Due to their intense and highly trained nature, these conditions were expected for the Australian troops. Several times throughout the duration of Long Tan, the Australians had to wait a long time for reinforcements and ammunition as when they would call up base, helicopters couldn't not be sent as it was a rubber plantation, with trees scattered everywhere. It was these times when the troops had to be at their highest in terms of helping others and looking after themselves. Without the troops having high hopes in themselves, their comrades and for reinforcement to arrive, the success in Long Tan would not have been made …show more content…
But it is the aftermath of the battle that is important. The Viet Cong no longer held sway in the province. The people of Ba Ria erected a banner honouring the Australians, saying that they appreciate the work done by the Australian force. This new earnt respect and relationship gained if reflectiveNo serious threat ever re-emerged for the Task Force. The North Vietnamese found a new and healthy respect for the Australians. The very act of survival by D Coy confirmed the validity of the training Australians received. It was a concrete validation that the Australian tactics were effective, life-saving and not as familiar to the North Vietnamese as some had thought. Although there were a number of Australian casualties, in relation to the Viet-Cong troops, Australia had a lot less. “There were 18 Australians killed - 17 from D Company and one from the 1st Armoured Personnel Carrier Squadron - and 21 wounded.”
As seen through source B, the efforts of the Australian troops are reflective of the number of casualties, in relation to the number they were fighting against, being up to two thousand, five hundred
This primary source taken from a quote once said by Padre Mancha explains how Australian nurses even in dangerous situation stayed loyal to there patients. This here stats the Australian contributions ranged from not just the battlefield but also in the hospital. Nurse Kelly continued to nurture patient,a german shell dropped close to the building knocking Kelly to the ground but not killing her. A great secondary source analysing Nurse Kelly is show in a channel 7 series “Australia the story of us”, this paints a visual understanding of experience of Nurse Kelly. Nurse Alicia Kelly was awarded the Military Medal for her actions during her time spent on the western
The soldiers would often use a technique called Gorilla. Gorilla is where the soldiers were to hide up in the trees or in the bush. Then their emery walked past and they would jump out while killing the person. This tactic was effective because the number of people who got killed that way. During this campaign, both sides fighting brought in new equipment.
Australians fought hand in hand during times of hardship, especially, when they were out-numbered and didn't have enough weaponry. For the past 3 months the control of Kokoda has gone back and forth but with our fighting squad, everyone's sure that this fight was made for us to win. A good example of our brave people is the 39th Battalion as they weren't trained to be overseas fighters but they still went to New Guinea even after they were told to, “bring their tennis
“Spin,” the third chapter of The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien begins by saying that the war “wasn’t all terror and violence.” O’Brien then proceeds to tell many brief stories that present good moments from the war. One of the short stories O’Brien narrates is about the soldiers' experience with an elderly Vietnamese man they referred to as a “poppa-san” who was hired to lead them through a field of landmines on the Batangan Peninsula for five days. The text says, “We enlisted an old poppa-san to guide us through the mine fields out on the Batangan Peninsula. The old guy walked with a limp, slow and stooped over, but he knew where the safe spots were and where you had to be careful and where even if you were careful you could end up like popcorn.”(32).
The conditions and terrain in which they were fighting in were horrendous and overrun with diseases. Despite all this, the Australians were victorious; pushing the Japanese back to the north coast – and finally defeated them at Sanananda. The recruitment for Kokoda were young kids off the street, forced to be in the army with little to no training or fighting experience. To the AIF, they were known as ‘chocolate soldiers’ or ‘chocos’; because they thought they would “melt under pressure”.
They saw their friends, brothers, and men they worked with, die. World War one was split in many small wars. One of the battle that the Australians helped to fight was the battle of Fromelles. The battle of Fromelles was considered one of the worst battles in history. It only went on for 12th hours, but yet the 5th Australian Division
Directed by Chris Drummond, Brink Production’s latest performance, Long Tan, takes his audience directly amid the infamous battle of the Vietnam War in just under two hours of heart-warming companionship and immersive carnage. Set primarily on the stormy evening of August 16th, 1966, in a rubber plantation, the play follows Delta Company, an infantry battalion comprising of ten young and rigorously trained soldiers from the Royal Australian Regiment. In a nonlinear narrative, Drummond explores the battle from both sides between the Viet Cong and the Australians. Chiefly compiled from a list of interviews with Vietnam veterans and their families, Verity Laughton’s script showcases the battle in all its confronting intensity, overwhelming the audience with history through a powerful Verbatim style theatre, whilst exploring themes of warfare, mateship, discipline, family, and the
60,000 Australian men participated in the War in total . This research shows, the Vietnam War was a very brutal, time consuming and also costly war, not only to Australia but also to the Americans and other allies. The war was the cause of the greatest social and political dissent in Australia since the conscription referendums of the First World War. The information displayed, outlines our involvement as well as the significant role we played as a Nation. Moreover the Vietnamese suffered a hefty 2 million dead as the war concluded.
This location enraged the Viet Cong and they retorted with an intention to impose a quick defeat on the "arrogant" Australians. When the Australians left their powerfully defended positions to seek for the mortar bases, they were ambushed on the 16-17 of august 1966, in which Nui Dat base were under attack from mortars and recoilless rifles. The following day they were able to locate some of the sites from which mortars had been fired, but nothing else. Patrols continued the next day, 18th august. D company had left the Nui Dat base at 11:15 that morning bound in order to search for mortar bases at Long Tan rubber plantation.
World War 1 was a devastating period for Australia and Australian’s alike. It was the costliest conflict that Australia has participated in throughout its history, with casualties, both fatal and non-fatal, one of the largest on a per capita basis of the allied nations. 1917 was an arduous year and has been described as “the worst year of the Great War”. There are many reasons why 1917 was a difficult year for all Australians but also why it was not “the worst year of the Great War”. Australian troops, all volunteers, were tough, brave and highly valued in the war.
In A Viet Cong Memoir, we receive excellent first hands accounts of events that unfolded in Vietnam during the Vietnam War from the author of this autobiography: Truong Nhu Tang. Truong was Vietnamese at heart, growing up in Saigon, but he studied in Paris for a time where he met and learned from the future leader Ho Chi Minh. Truong was able to learn from Ho Chi Minh’s revolutionary ideas and gain a great political perspective of the conflicts arising in Vietnam during the war. His autobiography shows the readers the perspective of the average Vietnamese citizen (especially those involved with the NLF) and the attitudes towards war with the United States. In the book, Truong exclaims that although many people may say the Americans never lost on the battlefield in Vietnam — it is irrelevant.
In 1941, two years after the commencement of World War Two, Japan entered the war and invaded much of Southern Asia, capturing and imprisoning 22’000 Australians, who became POWs. One of those prisoners was Colonel Ernest Edward Dunlop, known to his fellow Australians as ‘Weary’. A medical officer responsible for over a thousand men on the Burma-Thai railway, who has been remembered because of his significant devotion to his fellow POWs and how he resisted Japanese brutality. Weary Dunlop’s significance in WWII and into the present day, is mostly the product of his effect on his fellow Australian POWs, who saw him as a leader amongst men and a man of profound altruism, in addition to establishing him as a symbol of hope and security because
Not only the war had a massive effect on the Indigenous in Australia, The war was a huge boom to the Australian economy and as it turned out another massive factor. As many Australian fundamental products were purchased as could be produced, and secondary, subsidiary industries manufactured many ‘modern’ items for the services. Many men and women retired and fled their careers to accompany the armed forces leading to a ‘deficit’ of labour. New commerce and businesses need to have been created to fund the troops with combat weapons, uniforms and ammunition. Scarce goods needed to be controlled by the Australian Government in enhancing better buying and selling and in ensuring that everyone received a fair share.
The role of women in Australian society started to change as a result of the war effort during World War II as their domestic roles were replaced by male dominating ones. On the home front, women dealt with the consequences of war – managing children and family responsibilities alone, shortages of resources, as well as their fears for the future, and the grief and trauma of losing loved ones. Australian women rose to the challenge of war by volunteering their services when manpower was limited and all Australians were needed to help sustain a functioning war economy.
However, even with this in mind, the battle was a significant one, for both good and bad reasons, and this cannot be denied. Through the sheer number of soldiers lost, all the way to the depiction of the Australian spirit in preserving the memories of these men, it is clear that the battle served a purpose, in the