1.0 INTRODUCTION
Why should be reform or make changes? Should an organization make changes? What are the factors that lead to change? What is the medium that allows the organization to achieve the desired changes? What are the consequences as a result of these changes? This is among the issues that often arise in an organization, whether in industry, government and private organisations have their own vision and mission. The changes need to be implemented to achieve the desired objectives through the planned processes for the purpose of achieving goal (Robert W. Swaim,2011). Change management is also often associated with the following factors, namely, to enable the organization go hand in hand with insistence or the ability of the competitors,
…show more content…
From the Note of WMG 2015, models that can be applied as a reference for the development of such change are Model Lewin, Re-egineering Perspective, Bridge & Mitchell, Zaffron and Logan, Higgs and Kotter Model. While, tools and technique can be used compraising as 6-Hats(de-bono), mind mapping, MBTI, communications, forces field analysis, stake holder analysis, effort analysis, Appreciative inquiry and World café.
In this situation, as has been done in the Marksman Culture programme can be described that the model used to assess the ability and credibility is to formulate a model of Kurt Lewin and for the relevant resolution is more appropriate tools and techniques used the Forcefield Analysis which used is more focused on assessing the importance of changes in attitude or direction people for change.
Kurt Lewin Change Management Model emphasize that the interest of the group or individuals within focuses on the factors that can influence people to change and he underlined that there are three stages required to make changes so as to achieve success. Three stage theory commomly referred to as Unfreeze, Change dan Re-freeze. The model shown as Figure 5 below: Figure 5: Lewin’s Three Step Change Process
Sources: WMG Notes
…show more content…
In this modern era, the responsibilities of leading and managing organizations not depends solely on the highest top only, it is now the responsibility shared with everybody working together toward to one goal. Based on these requirements, the Malaysian Army is to change the minds of progressively more accurate or more implement changes in paradigm towards the lower levels, especially personnel in order to be a leader and
In this paper, I am going to focus mainly on three aspects, which are going to assist me to be a better leader. First, I will identify the most critical leadership problems that are effecting the Brigade culture and climate. Then I will create my vision, which will lead to solving all the challenges in the brigades.
Change can alter the normal routine of the workplace hence creating chaos. Organizational change can aid in improving the image of the organization, promoting efficiency and improve on the competitiveness of the organization (Schein, 2004). The manager can function as a trainer by helping the members of the organization to learn how to utilize the data to be used to promote development. He or she can help the members of n organization to acquire a new set of skills to help solve future problems of the organization.
5.2 Analysis of change management success factor Why Kotter’s Model? It is not all the models will be perfectly suitable for a particular scenario in the organization. Kotter Accelerate’s 8 Steps 2014, extended version of Leading Change 8 steps 1996. Both the versions are relevant and effective today, but they designed to serve different context and objective.
The 56th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT), widely considered at one point in time as one of the elite ABCTs in the maneuver brigades in Forces Command, however it later encountered a variety of leadership problems before, during, and after its deployments. It is not surprising that my fellow leaders in the organization, COL Timmons and CSM Rose would face challenges, problems, or issues. The main concern in this case study points out how the leaders dealt or faced the challenges, which makes all the difference in the world when leading an organization. Failing to adapt to new challenges or complexities that the brigade faced aided and contributed to the downward movement of the organization as a damaged unit. Additionally the perception
Army defines leadership as “influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation, while operating to accomplish the mission and improve the organization.” As a professional Non-Commissioned officer, proudly serving in the United State Army and within the boundary that clearly depicts vivid picture of Army Leadership. I am SGT Mostafazadeh define and develop my first Leadership Philosophy and most importantly use it in the daily bases and maintain revision and update it as I develop and learn new thing throughout my Military Carrere. The ground foundation of my Leadership philosophy is based on three core Leader Competencies include Leads, Develops and Achieves and how each one of those factor impact my organization (Army), Army human resources (senior, peers and subordinates) and
“Leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the organization” defined in ADP 6-22. I truly believe in order to provide purpose, leaders need to understand the big picture, when providing direction, a leader needs to properly understand the situation, and for a leader to provide the motivation you need to know your Soldiers. Being an effective Leader in the United States Army is very complex. As a Leader we need to be able to adapt to our ever changing environment. The elements of leadership I want to emphasize about is communication, respect, and personal responsibility. 1.
Unlike Lippitt’s change theory, Lewin emphasised on teams or work groups to bring about change. The reason being people in an organisation work in groups, and that individual behaviour will have to be conformed to the groups’ norms and fundamental practices (Burnes, 2009). “Unfreezing” is the stage to destabilize the current equilibrium so as to initiate change. According to Kurt Lewin’s Force Field Analysis (Lewin 1951), behaviour is a force in equilibrium and change will only occur when there is a disequilibrium in the force. The most important step for this stage is to identify the change focus, which in this case is the implementation of eIMR in the ED.
Abstract The strategic change cycle is one of the processes within strategic planning. This cycle is a ten-step process created to assist organizations in meeting their mandates, satisfying their missions, and constructing public value. “Strategic planning is intended to enhance an organization’s ability to think, act, and learn strategically” (Bryson & Alston, 2011). Introduction Strategic planning is “a deliberate, disciplined effort to produce fundamental decisions and actions that shape and guide what an organization (or other Entity) is, what it does, and why it does it” (Bryson & Alston, 2011).
Hence, leaders need to be prepared and manage readiness to the alteration by making an environment of honesty and transparency for their team as a successful implementation of the change is unlikely. Employees must be part of the change hence, they must to be told about the requirement of the change and be given a reward to motivate to embrace the change. If change be accepted by all recipients it can be implemented quickly and effectively. The leaders’ attitudes and behaviors have both positive and negative alterations on the change success. Therefore, leaders of organizations need to try and develop a more framing and shaping behavior, adding skills on themselves to change and motivate the subordinates towards the embracing the change.
This theory was originally presented in 1947 by Kurt Lewin. Unfreezing, Change, Freezing. Unfreezing: This first stage of change involves preparing the organization to accept that change is necessary, which involves break down the existing status quo before you can build up a new way of operating. Key to this is developing a compelling message showing why the existing way of doing things cannot continue, reason for change (Driving Forces) has been covered under the FFA Model.
As a Non-Commissioned Officer in today’s Army, my leadership philosophies, with the help of some exceptional leaders, were forged. Great leaders have the ability to mold subordinates through persistent communication and leading by example. By cross checking my personal leadership philosophy with the Army Values, I know that my standards are in acceptance with the Army beliefs. In this short paper, I will explain my philosophy by outlining my core beliefs and leading values. At my core, I believe that soldiers are due a leader that has a passion for the Army and their MOS.
Leadership in the Army is the fundamental foundation of the organization. Leaders like Officers and Non- Commission Officers implement and set the standard of leader to soldiers. These leaders ensure the Army soldiers are trained and prepare for any hardships they face. The term Leadership can be defined differently based on the organization in which the term is applied to. In the Army Leadership can be described as a "characterized by a complex mix of organizational, situational, and mission demands on a leader who applies personal qualities, abilities, and experiences to exert influence on the organization, its people, the situation, and the unfolding mission" (ADP 6-22).
The acceptance of change and the willingness to embrace it is largely dependent on the experiences that employees have had in the past. No one generation is more or less likely to resist change and it is fair to anticipate resisters to change from all four generations. In a Traditionalist’s world, change only happened when there was a good reason for it. The old adage ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ was often applied.
5.1 PILLARS OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT For the change to be effectively managed, there are five essential pillars that the change manager has to consider. The first, and most important, is communication since by nature; people have a yearning for information (Adams and Bourrage, 2014). Communication is the mechanism that can be used to engage people in change. It is through communication that a change manager or the project implementation manager gets informed about the exposure of stakeholders in the organisation to change.
The program can proceed if all agents pivotal to the success of the change are engaged and a clear and concise vision for the future has been developed. Once the change model is in place, it is time to define the structure of change. Senior leaders should provide a clear path for communications and responsibility at each level. At this point I have realised that Change management is not an alternative to project management.