Behaviorist Response Paper

Classical conditioning is a process of learning in which a two stimuli are affiliated with each other. The second stimulus is performed in response to the initial stimulus. Classical conditioning is used in a multitude of areas of learning. Pet owners, parents, and teachers use it in order to condition their animals and children to perform certain tasks in response to a certain stimulus. For example, some pet owners use classical conditioning to condition their dog to bark when they hear a certain sound (such as a whistle, click, buzzer, etc.). When the dog hears the noise, they know that they need to bark. Sometimes, however, classical conditioning does not work in the way the experimenter hopes it will.

Throughout the history of concepts such as behaviourism and the psychodynamic approach, there are many similarities yet there is also a variety of underlying differences between both approaches. The writer will compare and contrast these methods of investigation. By juxtaposing events, an in depth analysis will be analysed to further ones knowledge of each approach.

Behaviourism is considered one of the main subjects in psychology and the two main people who founded behaviourism were, Burrhus Frederic Skinner, also known as B.F Skinner and Ivan Pavlov who were famous for the work they did on classical and operant conditioning (Moderato & Presti, 2006). According to Moderato and Presti

Albert Bandura believed that people learn through observing others behavior, attitudes and outcomes of those behaviors. Most of the human observed others behavior through modeling and from the observation, one will have an idea for a new behavior to perform on later occasions. Social learning theory explains human behavior in term of continuous mutual interaction between cognitive, behavior and environment influence.

Psychology is the scientific study of how human think, how they feel about issues and their behaviour in this research we will learn the meaning of perspectives in Psychology, dwelling on the biological and behavioural approach, I will discuss the difference and commonalities between the two perspectives.

His discipline argues for the idea that everything that humans are a part of is not based upon free will. Behaviorism states that the law of cause and effect inevitably restricts all humans: that everything we do is not an individual action, but rather that all the behaviors that make up our lives are only our reactions to previous actions (Wilkens). Therefore, seemingly spontaneous actions are not actually planned by our own minds in the moment, and they should be classified as what Skinner calls “predispositions” instead. Behaviorism centers heavily on scientific thought rather than religion, and it even rejects the idea of a soul because it is not something that can be tangibly proven with solid evidence. Instead of trying to connect all the aspects of life to each other on spiritual level like a religious individual would, Behaviorists only care about the hard facts. They observe humans like a science: through repeated evidence and proven results. Because of this, Behaviorists believe the social environments surrounding an individual will strongly represent what kind of a person they become in the future. Skinner believed that certain passions and certain people would shape an individual’s character as time progressed throughout their life. These things are what Skinner calls “stimuli”, to which our brain gives a “response”. The stimulus is received, and our minds decide how to plan out our individual behavior accordingly. If there is a negative stimulus in the environment, then Skinner would suggest experimenting with something that he coined as “positive reinforcement” (Wilkens 62), which essentially introduces something new to the environment with the purpose of improving someone’s character. Skinner sought to shape people’s mindsets to be less self-centered on personal control. However, he was intentional and qualified

When it comes to Pavlovian conditioning, or classical conditioning, humans will associate a stimuli and anticipate an event (Spielman, 2014). The stimuli can continually change and make us learn and behave in different ways. For example, if some comes home every day and their spouse is nice to them and has dinner ready, they will learn to be excited when they walk in the door. However, if that same person was scared every time they walked in the door, they will learn to be afraid. The way that humans and animals’ learn is much simpler than I thought before I researched more about Pavlovian conditioning. Most animals can be taught through pavlovian conditioning, considering Ivan Pavlov’s experiment on dog’s salivating at a bell is one of the most famous examples of classical conditioning. I can easily teach my dogs how to learn things through Pavlovian conditioning. If I tell my dogs “go to bed” they will run to their beds and wait for a treat. They are so conditioned that even when they go in their bed by themselves they look at me for a

As previously stated, conditioning is the process we learn by association. There are two forms of conditioning; classical and operant. In classical

There are also two types of conditioning, classical and operant. In the case of classical

A theory of learning that focuses solely on observable behaviours discounting the importance of such mental activity as thinking, wishing and hoping is called behaviourism.

The primary keywords associated with behaviorism are: classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and stimulus-response2. Classical conditioning was researched extensively by Ivan Pavlov, and included an unconditioned stimulus,

Operant conditioning is a method of learning that occurs through rewards and punishments for behavior. It was discovered by Skinner.

Behaviorist and Cognitivist leaning theories are two key elements of psychology that have significant implications for education, learning, as well as technology. The behaviorist learning theory “Focuses on that which is observable and measurable“. Furthermore, it regards the concept of learning as a behavior and provides a framework for manipulating behavior through conditioning for a desirable result reinforcement and punishment. The behaviorist stance on learning is a behavior can be learned through rewards and punishment. The cognitivist learning theory focuses on the mind and mental thinking even more so, how the mind acquires and processes information. These two learning theories both have similarities and differences in their approach

Operant Conditioning is a learning process, where decisions are controlled by the consequences. The name for it first came from Burrhus Skinner (1938), although he did not completely initiate the voluntary behavior studies. It was firstly studied extensively by Edward Thorndike. He came up with the idea that behaviors that end up with satisfying consequences tend to be repeated, in what is today known as Thorndike’s law of effects (Thorndike 1901). Today this theory is used widely in the world and has been a resounding success in psychology.

Behaviourism is a learning theory of humans and animals that pays much considerable attention only on objectively observable behaviours. Which could simple mean it relies only on observable behaviour as it disregards other activities of the mind. It came to a point whereby behaviour theorists conduct the experiments. These experiments were conducted regarding the identification of Conditioning as a universal learning process. Later on, it was evidently discovered that we 've only two different types of conditioning up to so far. Classic conditioning serves as the first type and its occurrence is due to the response from a central nervous system to a stimulus. The world known example of classic conditioning is Pavlov 's observation that dogs salivate when the eat or even see food. Operant Conditioning serves as the second type and its occurrence is due to a feedback to a stimulus from a natural reflex.