Identity Norms (1) Belgitude The concept of belgitude can be described as “a popular culture centered around beer, fat food and folk parties [...]; a use of French distinguishing itself by the use of “tu”, idiomatic expressions, and accents borrowing from Flemish or different patois; and, more fundamentally an attitude characterized by compromise-seeking, hostility to any form of pretentiousness, a sense of hospitality, and of course humor – an offbeat, irreverent, sly humor. […] many Belgians like to essentialize their culture […] and to claim it as an integral part of their experience and collective identity.” (Petit & Rubers 2013: 12). Several elements mentioned in the above definition are recurrent in the comment streams: the great importance given to beer (a), fat food (b), the fact alcohol together with parties can trigger the use of Walloon (c), some comments recognized an influence of Germanic languages to Walloon (d) (note that in the definition this peculiarity is meant for French but its existence in Walloon is not incidental), the hostility to pretentiousness (e), and a sense of humor (f) (even though the type of humor is matter of discussion). The following …show more content…
Indeed, in French-speaking Belgium, Brussels has been elevated to the rank of cultural and political center, therefore Walloons tend not to make a difference between the capital and Wallonia, one being the extension of the other depending from the perspective (Pirotte 1994: 34-39). Therefore, the ability for an individual to speak Walloon has become a mean to create this difference and claim a regional identity within Belgium. Contrary to the feelings France generated, the relationship to Brussels seem to be more benevolent, for instance where it seems that speaking Walloon in Brussels might be a source of confusion for its inhabitants, which in turns could be comical for the
Crowd behavior also termed Mob or Herd mentality explains the cohesive social behavioral patterns exhibited by individuals who are in a large group- in essence, large number of people acting coherently in the same manner. To discover the psychological basis for this coherence, this paper will explore the implications of social identity theory on crowd behaviors. Utilizing, Social identity theory to understand the bias that permeate in various social context such as the “Racist Chelsea Fans” controversy in 2015. Social Identity Theory coined in 1970 by Henri Tajfel and John Turner explores the social dynamics of intergroup relations and its implications to normative behavior (Tajfel & Turner, 2004). Centralized around the multifaceted social
Conclusion There has been an increase in transgender representation in popular culture. Representation of the gender binary can be seen in the media, advertising and television, yet it seems to further escalate the notions of gender identity being down to sex and that a male or female must adopt the gender characteristics associated with their gender, either “masculinity” or “femininity”. There is a lack of non-binary gender representation which further marginalises certain groups such as women and those who are LGBTQ.
In “Creation and the other,” David Attridge utilizes the term idioculture to describe the “embodiment in a single individual of widespread cultural norms and modes of behavior” (Attridge 21).
Introduction Social identification is a very important source of both one’s pride and self-esteem. Because groups give us a sense of social identity and belongingness to the social world, intergroup relations have a huge impact on the actions we engage ourselves in. “We are not born with senses of self. Rather, self arises from interaction with others” (Griffin, 2012). In this paper I will first give a summary of Tajfel and Turner’s Social Identity Theory.
Nowadays, the term humor is considered “as the highest and richest form of comedy, denoting anything witty or anything that makes us laugh” (Weaver & Cotrell, 2001). Additionally, “humor is understood as a collection of mental processes that are involved in both creating and perceiving an amusing stimulus, as well as the affective response in the enjoyment of this stimulus” (Martin, 2007). In the communicative context, humor is ‘‘any communication perceived by any of the interacting parties as humorous and leads to laughing, smiling or a feeling of amusement’’ (Robinson, 1977). Furthermore, Lovorn (2008) states that laughter is described by humor researchers, as a response to pleasurable and/or amusing physical, emotional and/or intellectual
Abigail Richardson Professor Drake 03/05/2023 OLDP 3332 Assignment 3: Deeper than the Dominant: the Multiple Identities Within Culture Within culture around the world, there are always multiple subcultures and identities that make up the whole. In Australia, I have noticed the outstanding diversity of culture and how different it is compared to my hometown, Hudson, Wisconsin. In Sydney, there are many subcultures that make up different viewpoints and identities within culture itself. For this assignment, I wanted to explore how different subcultures can have such different perspectives and viewpoints on life in Australia, so I chose to interview my friend from across the hall, Ayan, and one of the women in my program, Ali.
Positionality Paper Throughout the semester, we have had the opportunity to study many different social identities and their impacts on my life. For the purpose of this paper, the three social identities I have decided to focus on are: gender, nation of origin and race. Key Influences/Specific Events My gender was my first known identity, even before my name was given or before I had taken my first breath.
A world full of people treating someone better because the person is either a woman or a man. Rules and expectation set on every man and woman because they couldn’t be seen a certain way. Being titled to be something else because it would be “socially unacceptable”, to be too girly or too boyish. This is what the social norm has pushed into people sense they were children. Men have been pushed to be the tough one’s to express no feeling at all.
I felt an added pressure to accept and recognise the disparities between my English culture another culture, and this was the beginning of cultural relativism. The people in Den Haag were very direct and honest with their opinions, due to their low context communication. They openly cursed at me when I accidentally didn’t see a cyclist when crossing the
In Aldous Huxley’s book, Brave New World, an unimaginable dystopia has been created. The World State was formed on three principles: community, identity, and stability. These three principles dictate how members of this society live and interact with one another. In modern society, there is an emphasis on the importance of motherhood, commitment, and countless other ideals that are rejected in the World State. Throughout the novel, the principle of community is shown with castes and hypnopaedic slogans, such as everybody belongs to everybody else.
Comedy is a social and cultural practice and thus plays a pivotal role in every culture across the globe. Comedy makes us laugh, smile and most importantly, unite. The use of television programs within cultures around the world helps with expression and identification through the concept of National Identity. Andy Medhurst explains, ‘comedy plays an absolutely pivotal role in the construction of national identity’ as it invites us to belong by understanding and sharing the humour (Turnbull 2010, p.159).
“Identity is never a priori, nor a finished product; it is only ever the problematic process of access to an image of totality” (Bhabha 1994:51). Identities have many traits, characteristics, group memberships, relations with others which define who a person is. Identities can be related to the past, present or future depending on what a person was what a person is and what a person wishes to be. Together, identities make up one 's self concept variously described as what comes to mind when one thinks of oneself (Neisser, 1993 ; Stets & Burke, 2003; St ryker, 1980 ; Tajfcl, 1981 ), one 's theory of one 's personality (Markus & Cross, 1990) , and what one believes is true of oneself ( B a umeister, 199 8 ; Forgas & Williams, 2002). Identity plays an important role in everyday life.
It has become dominant even in Brussels, the capital, despite the fact that it was located in Flanders. Wallonia became exponentially industrialised and wealthy, while Flanders remained agricultural and poor. The origins of modern Flemish nationalism can be marked out to the “Flemish movement”, which during the 19th and 20th centuries sought political and cultural equality with the less-numerous but territorially larger Walloons. Under the pressure of the Flemish movement, the Belgian government gradually expanded the official use of Dutch in legal, educational and administrative affairs. Nevertheless, the language policy became one of dual monolingualism, based on the territorial location, not bilingualism.
Stereotyping is a way of categorizing certain groups of people or types of individuals with regards to gender, race, culture, religion etc. Stereotyping arises from prior assumptions due to influences by the media, history and personal experience. The statement: “To gain an understanding of the world we need to make use of stereotypes,” appears that stereotyping is required in order to really understand the world, and knowledge issues can be drawn from this statement: Does stereotyping prevent us from knowing someone truly and how are stereotypes created in the first place? One way to examine and discuss the knowledge issues is to look at different areas of knowledge, which in our case will be History and Human Science.
Leary, Wheeler and Jenkins (1986) conducted two studies to examine the relationship between an individual’s salient aspects of identity, and behavioral preferences. Both social and personal aspects of identities were considered for the purpose of these studies. According to Cheeks and Briggs (1982), the characteristics that form a person’s identity can be dichotomized into social and personal elements. Personal elements are those components of one’s self-definition that uniquely “belong” to an individual. These may include one’s beliefs, goals, abilities, and feelings, among other things.