When Brent at last receives her and her children’s full liberation, she obtains it through the benevolence of a true friend, Mrs. Bruce. Brent enlightens that “I am deeply grateful to the generous friend who procured it, but I despise the miscreant who demanded payment for what never rightfully belong to his or his” (185) and though Brent was truly appreciative of the benevolence shown to her by her friend, she was not entirely happy about it either. Brent realized the implications behind a human being sold as a piece of property and that though she was bought under kind circumstances, it was a kind of benevolence that should never have been needed in the first place. Brent pronounces that “A human being sold in the free city of New York! The …show more content…
While Captain Delano observes the slaves in their various tasks, his opinion of what an African slave’s traits are become glaringly clear, he explains while looking at the six Ashantees that there is a “peculiar love in negroes of uniting industry with pastime” and that they “had the raw aspect of unsophisticated Africans” (2902). Captain Delano truly believes that Africans merely enjoy working hard for their masters and that they are not intelligent enough to conceptualize wanting something more than this. Nothing more accurately articulates Captain Delano’s perspective on the benevolence of slavery then the ‘benevolent’ relationship he views between Benito and Babo—master and slave. Captain Delano finds a “humane satisfaction” when he “witnessed the steady good conduct of Babo” (2903) the seemingly loving nature of Babo reassures Delano of his own interpretations of slaves and how that relationship is supposed to be perceived. Analogously, Benito Cereno explains to Captain Delano that “it is Babo here to whom, under God, I owe not only my own preservation, but likewise to him, chiefly, the merit is due, of pacifying his more ignorant brethren, when at intervals tempted to murmurings” (2907), in which the purported benevolence of Babo has empowered Cereno to keep control of his ship. Captain Delano becomes envious of “the beauty of that relationship which could …show more content…
Captain Delano’s benevolent nature also causes him to notice the mulatto stewards “extreme desire to please; which is doubly meritorious, as at once Christian and Chesterfieldian” (2936), explaining that wanting to serve someone so much means they are a good Christian. Therefore, making the confines of slavery something that is divined by God through benevolence. When Captain Delano is leaving Cereno’s quarters he becomes frightened of passing by the slave Atufal, but then after passing him “with the chained figure of the black, clenched jaw, and hand relaxed. Once again he smiled at the phantoms which had mocked him, and felt something like a tinge of remorse, that, by harboring them even for a moment, he should, by implication, have betrayed an almost atheist doubt of the ever-watchful Providence above” (2943), rationalizing that to question the benevolent motive of a slave would be similar to questioning Gods providence and therefore foolish.
This chapter addresses the central argument that African history and the lives of Africans are often dismissed. For example, the author underlines that approximately 50,000 African captives were taken to the Dutch Caribbean while 1,600,000 were sent to the French Caribbean. In addition, Painter provides excerpts from the memoirs of ex-slaves, Equiano and Ayuba in which they recount their personal experience as slaves. This is important because the author carefully presents the topic of slaves as not just numbers, but as individual people. In contrast, in my high school’s world history class, I can profoundly recall reading an excerpt from a European man in the early colonialism period which described his experience when he first encountered the African people.
In Equiano's personal slave narrative, "The Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African", Equiano flips the idea that the African people are backwards and barbaric, thus ripe for slavery, by demonstrating his personal exceptionalism through his literacy to show that it is truly the white people who are backwards and barbaric through their own hypocrisy. This reversal that Equiano demonstrates in his slave narrative shows that the savagery of African people exists as a misconception and makes the reader fully grasp the need to abolish slavery and any inequality present. On page seventy-eight, Equiano uses first person pronouns like 'I', 'my', and 'me' to separate himself from the other African people and whites around him. This separation that Equiano creates demonstrates his exceptionalism as an African slave.
In this article “African Dimensions Of The Stono Rebellion”, John Thornton a professor of history and African American studies, who wrote about the African slaves in the Americas, and specifically the servants in South Carolina during the early eighteenth century. In his writing, the author describes the personality of Africans and their desire to escape from slavery, going through obstacles on their path to freedom. John Thornton is primarily an Africanist, with a specialty in the history of West Central Africa before 1800. His work has also carried him into the study of the African Diaspora, and from there to the history of the Atlantic Basin as a whole, also in the period before the early nineteenth century. Thornton also serves as a consultant
In Terry Alford’s novel “Prince Among Slaves” there were many people that strived to bring Ibrahima back to Africa, during this time he also worked to free his children. The role of letter writing had an impact on the course of the book and each person connected the direction of Ibrahima’s journey. A former prince, Abd al-Rahman Ibrahima, was captured through an ambush due to his lost to the Hebohs and is now a slave (23).
As the boom from the transatlantic slave trade was being put into a question of universal humanity and morality, millions of Africans were still being sold into a life of victimhood. Amongst those millions were freemen being stripped from their homes, because of their race, in the core and coastal regions of Africa. The Neirsee Incident occurred on, “January 21st, 1828” at a “British owned palm oil house near old Calabar” (Blaufarb and Clarke 71). The Neirsee as it was stopped at the port near the British owned palm oil house, was interrupted by a character name Feraud who “slipped out of old Calabar on the Neirsee”, where the ship was eventually seized after it had, “just loaded its human cargo” (Blaufarb and Clarke 72). The incident had led to innocent British citizens lives being sold into the slave trade.
Many of the sailors were accurately portrayed by their actions, by throwing slaves into the ocean, flogging, beaten, tortured, and other forms of cruel punishment. “Alexander Falconbridge was a surgeon on slave ships in the 18th century. An abolitionist and governor himself is guilty of all the violent attacks towards slaves. A disgraces to human nature, and profound language were brutal examples sailors often used towards slaves.” ( First Hand; Accounts Study).
Under the power and jurisdiction of their masters, slaves lost their humanity and became extensions of their masters (Rauch, Sherman, & Hagel). Consequently, slaves wished to escape their cycle of subordination as presented in many non-fictional slave texts, such as in Mariano Pereira’s interview after slavery or in the Ilheus, Bahia slave treaty in 1789 (Krueger). Given that the slave could not challenge the institution with enough power to eliminate it, slaves must have sought other means to oppose the institution and gain some autonomy. Hence, primary sources become excellent texts to extract and define the form of resistances slaves utilized to oppose their masters. In Plautus’s play, Pseudolus, and Machado de Assis’s short story, The Cane, slaves used the manipulation of language, the master’s power in persuasion, and the reliance on others to wager on gaining autonomy.
In this paper, I will discuss the similarities, and the differences between “The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano” and “Journal of the First Voyage to America”. Both stories are trying to persuade the readers to reach their personal goal. However, there are a lot of differences between these two stories: different reader, different purpose,... Starting with, “The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano”. The author in his writing is talking about the living condition of the slaves on the ship.
As the two men discuss strategies for exoneration, James Hutton Brew outlines the faults in British law and in British perception of African culture and how those factors could be used in their favor (32). James Hutton Brew also goes on to say that “there are two basic strategies to beating and accusation of slavery. First convince them that the salve is an apprentice. Or second convince them that the girl was purchased as a wife” (32). This manipulation of British law and understanding allows the reader to conclude that while Abina’s story is distinct, it shares many of the common issues that slave owners and their sympathizers have learned to combat against, and since James Hutton Brew and Quamina Eddoo are implementing those tactics on Abina, it follows that
The Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass shows the imbalance of power between slaves and their masters. In his book, Douglass proves that slavery is a destructive force not only to the slaves, but also for the slaveholders. “Poison of the irresponsible power” that masters have upon their slaves that are dehumanizing and shameless, have changed the masters themselves and their morality(Douglass 39). This amount of power and control in contact with one man breaks the kindest heart and the purest thoughts turning the person evil and corrupt. Douglass uses flashbacks that illustrate the emotions that declare the negative effects of slavery.
“Yes, sir, he gives me enough, such as it is.” The colonel, after ascertaining where the slave belonged, rode on; the man also went on about his business, not dreaming that he had been conversing with his master. He thought, said, and heard nothing more of the matter, until two or three weeks afterwards. The poor man was then informed by his overseer that, for having found fault with his master, he was now to be sold to a Georgia trader. He was immediately chained and handcuffed; and thus, without a moment’s warning, he was snatched away, and forever sundered, from his family and friends, by a hand more unrelenting than death.”
Olaudah Equiano begins his journal entry by describing the ocean and the slave ship, which were the first things he saw when he was taken onto the slave ship. He was fascinated by them, but he soon realized that it was going to be a horrific journey. Equiano’s first thought was that they were going to kill him, for they had a different skin tone, bore long hair, and spoke a different language. The crew beat Olaudah when he refused to eat. The conditions under the deck where Equiano lived were dreadful: people were packed together so tightly that they were fighting for breathing room.
Frederick Douglass’s narrative provides a first hand experience into the imbalance of power between a slave and a slaveholder and the negative effects it has on them both. Douglass proves that slavery destroys not only the slave, but the slaveholder as well by saying that this “poison of irresponsible power” has a dehumanizing effect on the slaveholder’s morals and beliefs (Douglass 40). This intense amount of power breaks the kindest heart and changes the slaveholder into a heartless demon (Douglass 40). Yet these are not the only ways that Douglass proves what ill effect slavery has on the slaveholder. Douglass also uses deep characterization, emotional appeal, and religion to present the negative effects of slavery.
In her essay ‘Yellow Fever and the Slave Trade: Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” (1998), or in this case in the chapter ‘The Contagion of Consumption and Guilt’, Debbie Lee describes how much slavery, guilt and diseases of seamen – especially yellow fever – are connected, regarding Coleridge’s “Mariner”. At the beginning, the author briefly mentions the slave trade which used to be very common during the eighteenth century and skilfully links it to the topic of guilt. At that time, more and more people and of course also abolitionist writers began to realize that slavery was not an exemplary model and that treating people, most of all Africans, as something inferior with no right of a proper life was not a particularly good idea. Europeans
Babo refuses to speak after he is taken prisoner at the end of Benito Cereno as an act of defiance against his captors. Unlike Benito, who is forced to speak by the court in the deposition, Babo demonstrates his free will and authority as the leader of the rebellion by choosing to remain silent. The court recognizes Babo not as a human being but as a slave whose value lies solely on his body. His silence shows his continued rebellion against the oppression of slavery and challenge the court’s authority over him as a man. Babo recognizes the futility in testifying the justice in his violence to a court that accepts slavery as a legal institution.