Assassination of Benigno Aquino Jr.: Reaction Paper Benigno Aquino Jr. is the husband of the former President of the Philippines Corazon C. Aquino and father to the current president of the Republic of Philippines, Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III. Benigno Aquino Jr. or known as “Ninoy” is one of the youngest politician who became a senator at a young age. He had a big possibility to be the President of the Philippines in the year 1989 but unexpected event happened, it is his assassination. In the movie, “The Assassination of Ninoy”, it shows how Benigno Aquino Jr. fight for the democracy of the Philippines resulting to his death. This movie also reveals some secrets or answers to the questions about the assassination of Ninoy. Here are some events that tackle in the movie. In the year 1972, President Ferdinand Marcos, declared the Proclamation 1081 or better known as “Martial Law”. He stated that the main reason of declaring Martial Law is to save the country against different crimes happened during that time. For Imelda Marcos, wife of President Ferdinand Marcos, during the Martial Law times, the country Philippines has been very peaceful. According to Rudolfo Salas, a former chairman of Philippine Communist Party, hundreds thousands were imprisoned during Martial Law including Senator Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino Jr. In the year 1977, Senator Ninoy found guilty of the crimes like murder, and possession of …show more content…
it answered some questions. This questions are: 1. What are the other purpose of Martial Law aside from the safety of the people during that time? 2. What is the feeling of Imelda Marcos in the Martial Law? 3. How many were imprisoned during martial in fighting the freedom of the Filipinos? 4. What do Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos feel about Ninoy? 5. What is the level of friendship between Ninoy and Ferdinand Marcos? 6. What are the reasons why Senator Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino Jr. got
Francisco Madero read James Creelman’s interview with President Diaz and thought that he would run for president and reform Mexico. Madero’s concerns were mainly political; he wanted voting to define something, and for people to express themselves freely. He was not sensitive to the famous desire to have access to land and to feed their families, neither was he very aware of the breaking in on peoples’ lands by farm work and extractive industries. In these early days, his courage to defeat Diaz rallied support throughout the
In this research paper, I will be talking about the moratorium of the death penalty, also known as, the capital punishment for criminals who have committed a serious crime. Following the discussion of Gregg v. Georgia Case, that happened in 1976, Furman v. Georgia, and how they each contributed to the moratorium of the death penalty. Later, comparing and contrasting about some aggravated assaults and mitigating assaults and how they differ from each other. Also about the direct causes of the moratorium of the death penalty. Then explain the indirect effects of the moratorium and the procedure of capital punishment and the policy of the death penalty.
1. Ishmael Beah’s violent experiences educated me about what the intended outcomes or aftermaths of violence are. One of these is causing unrest and coercing the government to change policies and abide to their terms. Another one is making people afraid and thereby establishing dominance. Another effect it can have is making people feel ashamed of their own powerlessness of being unable to save themselves, their families, and their friends.
The book focuses on how Khalil was murdered and how he needs justice. Although, has never mentioned the fact that he lived, until the riot. Like Starr clearly states “His life mattered”. Unfortunately, this is not just about Khalil, all their lives mattered. Which is why Starr makes a difference.
He addresses/highlights the risk of any altercations with Korea, and appeals to fear to his audience by motivating immediate action and restraint among many who want to afflict harm on the Koreans. Truman presents an adequate way for their country by cooperating/spreading his ideals to unify the country’s decision/collaboration as a whole. Truman’s purpose of stating the reasoning for releasing MacArthur from his post reflects the idea of “world peace” which to him is displayed as “[more] important than any [other individuals]” suggesting his general's inability to follow through with his objective. To build on his claim Truman states, “We and the other free countries will continue to resist the attack.” He establishes a certain boundary that should not be crossed by any means necessary, even if they're consumed by their own anger/frustration that the temptation of violence allures them to carry out
The book addresses four principle questions. First, when the use of force was an issue, what did military advisers recommend compared to civilian advisers? Second, what effect did the advice of the military have on presidential decisions, and how was their influence brought to
The following publication of Albert J. Beveridge’s powerful speech, strongly advocates the annexation of the Philippines, which took a virtually major relationship between religion, race, and profit for imperial expansion. The most striking point about Albert J. Beveridge text, however is his five poorly thought out reasons justifiying Americas to colonize the Phillippines, which were religion, trade, keeping up with other countries, resources, and “barbarous” natives. Albert J. Beveridge, a first-term Republican senator from Indiana, was one of the most ardent advocates of imperialism. Noted for his speaking abilities and fervent nationalism, Beveridge traveled to the Philippines in order to gather information. In Albert J. Beveridge’s 1900
Hoganson’s approach of the annexation purely for cultural reasons rather Painter’s, which is more agricultural. She saw America taking over The Philippines as a way for The Philippines to mature. Even though both authors have two different perspectives on the annexation, they both still are complementary to each other. They both provide valid arguments for there reasoning of the takeover of The
(Find that in your book). In your essay, discuss the reasons that the US entered the conflict in Iraq and the reasons that the US entered the conflicts as described in the Domino Theory. How are they different? How are they the same?
This violence that arouse in the city changed my life completely. The violence changed my daily routine even though my community was not directly affected. As my freedom was eroded, my family and I were forced to adapt to new life styles. Being a teenager, I was not allowed to go out as often, and I was not permitted to roam the streets of my beautiful city
As Albert J. Beveridge pointed out in Document B, “would not the people of the Philippines prefer the just, human, civilizing government of this republic to the savage, bloody rule… from which we have saved them?” Just, human, civilizing? Strict, biased, Christianizing was more like it. In these islands, the United States of America once again made the same mistake it had made with the Native Americans. Determined that there way was the best way, ‘the slaughter of the Filipinos’ (Doc.
On March 5, 1770, three men died of gunshot wounds and two others died from their injuries. The events leading to their deaths are crucial to understand. Great Britain had stationed soldiers in Boston to enforce laws and defend protests. The colonists were resisting the British laws because Britain had been enforcing taxes created by the British Parliament in which the Colonies had no representation. Tension between the colonists and soldiers erupted on the night of March 5.
Introduction The hope for this research essay is to try to implement and understand the role of democracy in the case of the Korean War. This research essay will look in depth to see if democracy can truly prevent war and bring peace or if it is irrelevant in what causes war in the international realm. This concept is also known as the Democratic Peace Theory. The Democratic Peace Theory is probably the most popular theme or theory in trying to understand what causes war and what causes peace.
INTRODUCTION We belong in a time where the world goes through constant changes. Life today is so fast-paced and dynamic that we sometimes knowingly ignore what 's happening around us since it may instantly change anyway. The Philippines specifically, have gone through great changes in the past several years. These changes have rooted from problems that made it impossible for us to develop and progress as a country.
The Cavite Mutiny of 1872 Philippine’s early history has been a series of colonization, revolution, and freedom with Spain as the first colonizers who occupied the Philippines for over 300 years. Every 12th of June since 1898, we, Filipinos, celebrate our Independence Day. In 1896, because of our desire to break free from the grasp of the abusive Spanish colonizers, a revolution broke out. It is thru this revolution that June 12 became a special day. However, another year merits our attention – the historic year of 1872 which is the year of the Cavite Mutiny.